Method of assessment of coal mines managers in the labor safety

2019 ◽  
pp. 77-88
Author(s):  
D.A. Nosal ◽  
◽  
V.H. Shevchenko ◽  
Author(s):  
Volodymy Gogo ◽  
◽  
Boris Kobylyansky ◽  

Purpose. The purpose of the article is to form an anthropocentric ergatic system of labor safety of coal miners and to determine its main factors, factors, components and characteristics to increase the effectiveness of measures to protect their labor, especially in the deep mines of Donbas. The research methodology is based on general scientific methods of cognition – empirical (observation of real production processes, factors and factors in coal mines, description of miners ‘actions in accordance with labor protection measures, etc.) and theoretical (analysis, synthesis, generalization, classification of information on miners’ safety), as well as systematic, functional and parametric analysis of production and social processes related to the safety of miners in coal mines. The results of the study are presented in the definition and characterization of the main internal and external factors and factors as the main components in the structure of anthropocentric ergatic system of safety of miners in coal mines, which substantiates technical and organizational measures to improve the safety of miners in modern conditions. Donbas. The scientific novelty of the obtained results consists in determining the patterns and functional relationships of internal and external factors and factors of the anthropocentric ergatic system of occupational safety of coal miners and substantiation of parametric relationships to improve the efficiency of miners and further prospects for automation of production processes. The practical significance of the results of the study lies in the possibility of any coal mine to use the general structure of the anthropocentric ergatic system of labor safety of coal miners in the formation of technical, technological and organizational measures to improve the safety of miners in modern socio-economic conditions of Ukraine.


2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca J. Atkins ◽  
H. Peter Pfister ◽  
Mark Fleming ◽  
Steven M. Smith

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 53-62
Author(s):  
I. A. Batyrev ◽  
◽  
S. M. Dobrovolskiy ◽  
A. M. Semenov ◽  
Yu. F. Strugov ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
Juella Rumiris

The use of portfolios as an assessment tool probably is unlikely common in Asian countries. Portfolios is commonly considered as a compilation of students’ work for a certain period of time. In fact, the portfolios may show the originality of and the nature of students’ learning improvement. In this paper, the writer will discuss portfolios as a method of assessment in English as Second Language or English as Foreign Language (ESL/EFL) classroom context from teacher’s perspective. This paper is designed with this format order: firstly to explain about the degree of portfolios method to assess content, skills and knowledge in the teach-ing-learning program in the ESL/EFL context, to correlate portfolios system to model of curriculum planning and policy context. Secondly, to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of portfolios method from a theoretical perspective, and analyse the validity, reliability, and fairness. Thirdly, to specify the association of portfolios method and the types of assessment and the correlation of portfolios method with assessment for learning. Fourthly, to evaluate the degree of portfolios method of assessment promoting learning of the knowledge, skills, and abilities related to my teaching experience.Keywords : Portfolios, Assessment, Curriculum, Learning, Knowledge, Skills.


1935 ◽  
Vol 4 (23) ◽  
pp. 188-189
Author(s):  
C. P.
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document