scholarly journals Metodologi dan Isu-Isu Krusial Tafsir Susastra Bint al-Shāṭi’: Sebuah Penghampiran Singkat

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-180
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ulinnuha

‘Ā’ishah ‘Abd al-Raḥmān bint al-Shāṭi’ (1913-1998) was an Egyptian female scholar who successfully applied a literary approach to interpreting the Qur’an. He put the idea in one of his monumental works, namely al-Tafsīr al-Bayānī li al-Qur’ān al-Karīm. This paper seeks to explain aspects of the interpretation methodology and some of the crucial issues in it. In the aspect of methodology, will be explained about the background of writing, sources, systematics, methods and interpretation patterns. While some crucial issues discussed are about the discourse of synonymity, asbabun nuzul and israiliyat. At the end of this article also comes with some critical notes on the thematic methods offered by Bint al-Shāṭi'’

1988 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barnaby B. Barratt ◽  
Tod S. Sloan

1996 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Shalev
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 443-458
Author(s):  
Luca Siliquini-Cinelli

AbstractThis paper expounds some critical reflections on Pierre Legrand's recent account of James Gordley's and James Whitman's comparative methodologies. Pushing his unconventional writing style to the limits and labelling Gordley's ‘positivist’ and Whitman's ‘cultural’ comparative law, Legrand's piece appears to be taking the first step towards a new, more sensitive phase for the comparative study of law and legal cultures. The paper argues that, contrary to what might be first thought, Legrand's ‘sensitive epistemology’ cannot act as a gateway to cultural otherness. This is because it is wholly in line with the constructivist objectification of life that characterises the study and practice of law both within and outside the comparative-law dimension.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 327-327
Author(s):  
Stefan Hopf

Abstract Modern societies can be regarded as service economies, consequently accessing services is an essential part of social and economic participation. Direct and indirect indiscrimination act as barriers to accessing and using services and one way to address these barriers is to implement anti-discrimination legislation and policy. From a sociological point of view, such policies and legal frameworks can be described as elements of the social discourse in these areas. These texts, along with their implicit and explicit interpretations of the problem, represent the official and legitimised stake of the socially available stock of knowledge of what constitutes age discrimination. Hence the shape and contribute to the general understanding of age discrimination. The study aims to investigate the interpretation patterns offered by the “supply” side, that is by those actors who in their work refer to but also (re-) shape and disseminate the problem interpretation contained in the official texts. To address this aim, focus groups with stakeholders and semi-structured interviews with legal and policy experts were conducted in Austria and Ireland. The findings highlight that experts and stakeholders’ definitions of age discrimination usually extend past legal and policy concepts. The expert and stakeholder approaches differ in their starting points for describing the problem, ranging from vulnerability considerations to human rights-based concepts and more structurally orientated needs-based criteria. Finally, the analysis also reveals a central distinguishing feature of age discrimination, namely the “de-temporalization” and “de-historicization” of the person, which is of equal importance as the de-individualization as a consequence of stereotyping


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document