The Influence of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warning Labels on Parents Choices

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 137 (2) ◽  
pp. e20153185-e20153185 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. Roberto ◽  
D. Wong ◽  
A. Musicus ◽  
D. Hammond
Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 4367
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Woo Baidal ◽  
Kelsey Nichols ◽  
Nalini Charles ◽  
Lauren Chernick ◽  
Ngoc Duong ◽  
...  

Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in childhood obesity in the United States (U.S.) originate in early life. Maternal sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption is an early life risk factor for later offspring obesity. The goal of this study was to test the effects of policy-relevant messages delivered by text messages mobile devices (mHealth) on maternal SSB consumption. In this three-arm 1-month randomized controlled trial (RCT), pregnant women or mothers of infants in predominantly Hispanic/Latino New York City neighborhoods were randomized to receive one of three text message sets: graphic beverage health warning labels, beverage sugar content information, or attention control. The main outcome was change in maternal self-reporting of average daily SSB consumption from baseline to one month. Among 262 participants, maternal SSB consumption declined over the 1-month period in all three arms. No intervention effect was detected in primary analyses. In sensitivity analyses accounting for outliers, graphic health warning labels reduced maternal SSB consumption by 28 kcal daily (95% CI: −56, −1). In this mHealth RCT among pregnant women and mothers of infants, graphic health warning labels and beverage sugar content information did not reduce maternal SSB consumption.


2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Y. Lee ◽  
Marie C. Ferguson ◽  
Daniel L. Hertenstein ◽  
Atif Adam ◽  
Eli Zenkov ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Jennifer Falbe ◽  
Astrid Montuclard ◽  
Alina Engelman ◽  
Sabrina Adler ◽  
Athena Roesler

Abstract Objective: There is a lack of qualitative research developing sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) warning labels with their intended end-users. We sought to identify promising SSB warning elements for improving label effectiveness and for future testing in policy and institutional settings. Design: Mixed-methods design using 10 focus groups, a design task, and survey. The design task was used to generate ideas for an icon that would dissuade SSB consumption. The survey and focus group guide assessed participant perceptions of SSB warning label mock-ups of text (loss-frame, gain-frame, and loss-frame with attribution), color, and icon options. Setting: Three large public universities in California from February-March 2018. Participants: Young adult SSB consumers (n=86) enrolled in one of three diverse California public universities. Results: Participants perceived the following elements as most effective for reducing SSB consumption: loss-frame text with attribution to a credible source, yellow and red color for label background, and an image or icon to accompany the text. Preferred images included sugar near or inside of an SSB, intuitive shapes like a triangle with exclamation mark or octagon, and a visual indicator of SSB sugar content compared with recommended limits. Support was high for using SSB warning labels in university cafeterias and on bottles/cans. Conclusion: Loss-frame text with a credible source, yellow or red label color, and icons could potentially enhance effectiveness of SSB warning labels and warrant further testing.


2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-126
Author(s):  
Ruopeng An ◽  
Jianxiu Liu ◽  
Ruidong Liu ◽  
Abigail R. Barker ◽  
Roger B. Figueroa ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 715-715
Author(s):  
Yujin Lee ◽  
David Kim ◽  
Junxiu Liu ◽  
Matti Marklund ◽  
Parke Wilde ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption is linked to weight gain, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Health warning labels on SSBs have been proposed in the US to discourage consumption. Yet, the potential health and economic impacts of SSB warning labels have not been quantified. We aimed to estimate the health and economic impacts of a SSB warning label in the US. Methods We used the validated Tufts Diabetes-CVD Microsimulation Model to estimate the impact of implementing a national SSB warning label in the U.S., compared to current status quo, on incident diabetes and CVD. Model inputs included nationally representative demographic, clinical, and SSB intake data from NHANES 2015–2016; policy effects on consumer intakes and SSB-disease effects from meta-analyses; disease data from CDC wonder database; and policy implementation costs and healthcare costs from established sources. Findings were evaluated over 10 years and a lifetime horizon, and costs (in 2019 USD) discounted at 3% annually. NHANES sampling weights were used to translate model estimates to nationally representative population estimates; and alternative scenarios evaluated smaller policy effects on consumer consumption, derived from prior interventional studies testing effects of SSB warning labels. Results Among 138 million US adults aged 40–79 years at baseline, 56% were SSB consumers, with mean intake of 1.10 servings/day (95% CI, 0.97, 1.23). Over 10 years, the SSB warning label was estimated to prevent 254 thousand (145, 362) incident CVD events and 231 thousand (–45, 507) diabetes cases, with $30.6 billion (29.2, 32.0) savings in healthcare costs. Over lifetime, corresponding values were 708 thousand (328, 1087), 422 thousand (77, 767), and $78.3 billion (43.8, 112.8), respectively. In sensitivity analyses with a 40% smaller policy effect size, corresponding lifetime values were 348 thousand (38, 658), 246 thousand (–98, 590), and $40.8 billion (31.5, 50.0) over a lifetime, respectively. Conclusions Implementing a national SSB warning label could generate substantial health gains and cost savings for the US population. Funding Sources NIH, NHLBI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document