The Effect of Repeated Mumps Skin Tests on Skin Sensitivity to Mumps Antigen

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1965 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 422-425
Author(s):  
SUSAN S. ARONSON ◽  
MARTHA L. LEPOW
Keyword(s):  
Skin Test ◽  
Antibody Titer ◽  
Mumps Virus ◽  
Positive Skin Test ◽  
Skin Tests ◽  
Subclinical Infection ◽  
Skin Sensitivity ◽  
Positive Skin ◽  
Skin Hypersensitivity ◽  
Clinical Illness

The mumps skin test, developed by Enders et al., in 1945, has been especially useful in identifying individuals who are immune to mumps either as a result of clinical illness caused by the mumps virus or a subclinical infection. A positive skin test can be demonstrated in 98% of persons who have a rise in complement-fixing antibody titer to mumps virus, and skin hypersensitivity may develop from 1 week to 3 months after infection. Although repeated skin tests with mumps antigen are not commonly performed, occasionally it is necessary to repeat a skin test within a few months or a year after a previous one.

Penicillin Hypersensitivity

1979 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 132-158
Keyword(s):  
Skin Test ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Positive Skin Test ◽  
Penicillin Allergy ◽  
Skin Tests ◽  
Penicillin G ◽  
Positive Skin ◽  
Positive History ◽  
History Of

A (massive) multicenter study of 3,000 patients has demonstrated that skin tests to penicillin G and penicilloyl-polylysine (PPL-now commercially available) predict and confirm penicillin allergy. Of patients with a history of penicillin reaction, 19% were positive to either, compared to 7% of controls. A history of anaphylaxis led to 46% positive. Of those with a history of urticaria 17% were positive, and those with maculopapular eruptions did not differ from controls (7% positive). Challenge with penicillin led to a reaction in 6% with a positive history (compared to 2% with a negative) and 67% with a combined positive history and positive skin test (to either).

scholarly journals IMMUNITY IN MUMPS

1946 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Enders ◽  
Lewis W. Kane ◽  
Elizabeth P. Maris ◽  
Joseph Stokes
Keyword(s):  
Parotid Gland ◽  
Skin Test ◽  
Attack Rate ◽  
Complement Fixation ◽  
Mumps Virus ◽  
Skin Tests ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
Positive Skin ◽  
Infected Monkey ◽  
Number Of Children

The results of skin tests read at 48 hours on several hundred adults and children in which heat-inactivated mumps virus was the antigen have been presented and discussed. They can be summarized as follows:— Of 89 persons tested before the onset of mumps, 89 per cent exhibited erythematous reactions 10 mm. or less in diameter and 95 per cent, reactions 15 mm. or less in diameter. Of 40 persons tested during the first 5 days of mumps, 95 per cent exhibited reactions 10 mm. or less and 98 per cent reactions 15 mm. or less. Of 480 exposed persons the attack rate of mumps was 46 per cent among 340 with reactions 10 mm. or less and 10 per cent among 240 with reactions greater than 10 mm. The attack rate was only 2 per cent among 161 with reactions exceeding 15 mm. The attack rates in 13 skin-tested groups which were exposed to mumps tended to be inversely proportional to the incidence of reactions exceeding 10 mm. The incidence of reactions exceeding 10 mm. was approximately twice as high among 529 adults (persons 18 years or older) as it was among 306 children (persons under 18 years). Of 179 adults giving positive histories of mumps, 82 per cent exhibited skin reactions exceeding 10 mm. In certain groups the correlation between history and positive skin test was as high as 0.9. Of 132 adults giving negative histories, 58 per cent exhibited skin reactions of this magnitude. The proportion of reactions exceeding 10 mm. in a small number of children giving positive histories was 75 per cent. The proportion of reactions less than 10 mm. was 15 per cent. Of 167 adults with positive complement fixation tests, 87 per cent exhibited skin reactions exceeding 10 mm. Of 111 adults with negative complement fixation tests, 52 per cent exhibited reactions exceeding 10 mm. Of 43 children with positive complement fixation tests, the skin test reactions exceeded 10 mm. in 70 per cent. The skin reactions exceeded 10 mm. in 29 per cent of 105 children with negative complement fixation tests. In 69 of 72 individuals in whom skin reactions exceeded 10 mm., complement-fixing antibody either appeared in the blood or increased in amount within about 2 weeks after the tests were done. Such antibody responses likewise were observed in 34 of 76 individuals in whom skin reactions were 10 mm. or less. The data summarized up to this point were obtained with virus derived from the infected parotid gland of monkeys. The results of simultaneous tests in 82 individuals employing materials prepared from infected monkey parotid gland and amniotic membrane of chick embryos infected with mumps virus indicated in general that the same individual responded in a similar manner to both antigens. In many instances, however, the membrane material produced weaker reactions. Occasionally an individual failed to react at all to one of these materials but did respond to the other.

scholarly journals Assessment of immediate and non-immediate hypersensitivity contrast reactions by skin tests and provocation tests: A review

2021 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 205873842110150
Author(s):  
Rakesh D Bansie ◽  
A Faiz Karim ◽  
Maurits S van Maaren ◽  
Maud AW Hermans ◽  
Paul LA van Daele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Contrast Media ◽  
Skin Test ◽  
Positive Skin Test ◽  
Skin Tests ◽  
Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Immediate Hypersensitivity ◽  
Positive Skin ◽  
Provocation Tests ◽  
Iodinated Contrast ◽  
Negative Skin Test

Introduction: Allergic and nonallergic hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM) and gadolinium-based contrast media are classified as immediate or non-immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHR and NIHR), respectively. Skin tests and provocation tests are recommended for the evaluation of hypersensitivity reactions to contrast agents; however provocations are not common in clinical practice. Methods: A MEDLINE search was conducted to investigate studies comprising both skin tests and provocation tests that evaluated hypersensitivity reactions to ICM. Results: Nineteen studies were identified that reported on skin tests, followed by provocations. In the case of IHR to ICM, 65/69 (94%) patients with a positive skin test for the culprit media tolerated a challenge with a skin-test-negative alternative ICM. In IHR to ICM with a negative skin test for the culprit media, provocations were positive in 3.2%–9.1% patients. In the case of a NIHR to ICM with a positive skin test, provocation with a skin-test-negative agent was tolerated in 75/105 (71%) of cases. In NIHR with a negative skin test for the culprit agent, re-exposure to the culprit or an alternative was positive in 0%–34.6% patients. Provocations with the same ICM in skin test positive patients with IHR or NIHR were positive for a majority of the patients, although such provocation tests were rarely performed. Data on hypersensitivity reactions, skin tests and provocations with gadolinium-based contrast media were limited; however, they exhibited a pattern similar to that observed in ICM. Conclusion: In both ICM and gadolinium-based contrast media, the risk of an immediate repeat reaction is low when skin tests are negative. In contrast, a provocation with a skin-test-positive contrast medium showed a high risk of an immediate repeat hypersensitivity reaction. Therefore, a thorough medical history is necessary, followed by skin tests. A provocation is recommended, for diagnostic work-up, when the diagnosis is uncertain.

Sequential degranulation of eosinophils induced by antigen or autocoids in allergic humans

1986 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 354-355
Author(s):  
Kate W. Sjoerdsma ◽  
W. James Metzger
Keyword(s):  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Bronchoalveolar Lavage ◽  
Allergic Asthma ◽  
Skin Test ◽  
Positive Skin Test ◽  
Positive Skin ◽  
Human Eosinophil ◽  
Asthmatic Patients ◽  
Allergic Asthmatic ◽  
History Of

Eosinophils are important to the pathogenesis of allergic asthma, and are increased in bronchoalveolar lavage within four hours after bronchoprovocation of allergic asthmatic patients, and remain significantly increased up to 24 hours later. While the components of human eosinophil granules have been recently isolated and purified, the mechanisms of degranulation have yet to be elucidated.We obtained blood from two volunteers who had a history of allergic rhinitis and asthma and a positive skin test (5x5mm wheal) to Alternaria and Ragweed. Eosinophils were obtained using a modification of the method described by Roberts and Gallin.

Meglumine antimoniate-induced DRESS: original case with a positive skin test

2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 845-847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amel Chaabane ◽  
Haifa Ben Romdhane ◽  
Hajer Ben Brahim ◽  
Nadia Ben Fredj ◽  
Zohra Chadli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skin Test ◽  
Clinical Picture ◽  
Drug Withdrawal ◽  
Skin Tests ◽  
Positive Skin ◽  
Meglumine Antimoniate ◽  
Blood Tests ◽  
Intradermal Tests ◽  
Original Case ◽  
Hepatic Cytolysis

Abstract We report a case of a 64-year-old woman treated with meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime®). On day 20, she developed fever, a pruriginous skin rash and myalgia. The blood tests showed eosinophilia and hepatic cytolysis. The clinico-biological picture improved gradually and the symptoms disappeared 4 weeks after the drug withdrawal. Six weeks later, intradermal tests to Glucantime® were performed and were positive at 48 hour-reading. This clinical picture suggests DRESS induced by meglumine antimoniate. To the best of our knowledge, only one case of meglumine antimoniate-induced DRESS has been reported in the literature and we are the first to report a case confirmed by skin tests.

THE CUTANEOUS REACTION TO EGGWHITE

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1959 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 1009-1015
Author(s):  
Richard L. London ◽  
Jerome Glaser
Keyword(s):  
Skin Test ◽  
Skin Testing ◽  
Intradermal Test ◽  
Skin Tests ◽  
Etiologic Factor ◽  
Initial Reaction ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Positive Skin ◽  
Clinical Sensitivity ◽  
Number Of Patients

A study of 400 allergic patients of all ages, who were skin tested with eggwhite, is reported. The authors agree with those who believe that a positive reaction in infants who have in no known way been exposed to eggwhite after birth is in all probability due to intrauterine sensitization. There is a possibility, however, that some reactions to eggwhite may be due to a primary histamine or serotonin releasing substance present in the eggwhite which has no relationship to antigen-antibody reaction. The circumstances under which this takes place are not known. In all age groups the family history was positive in about 65% of cases. It was surprising to find, in view of previous opinions, that in the youngest age group (infants up to 2 years of age), the skin test was positive in less than half the patients (42%) in the presence of clinical sensitivity. It was also unexpected to find that the number of patients clinically sensitive to eggwhite but giving negative skin tests increased as age advanced. This justifies the common practice of eliminating egg as a trial measure in the diet of the first age group, regardless of the results of skin testing, and suggests that this should be done in any age group where food is considered a possible etiologic factor. In the youngest age group somewhat more than one-third (34%) of the patients reacted positively to eggwhite but were not clinically sensitive. This finding was completely unexpected as it had been thought that in this age group a positive skin test to eggwhite was practically pathognomonic of clinical sensitivity. In this study more positive reactions in children to eggwhite were obtained (70.5%) than in a somewhat comparable series where the incidence was much less (20%). We attribute this to the fact that in our series both scratch and intradermal tests were made while in the other series only scratch tests were done. This reflects the greater sensitivity of the intradermal test. Only about half the patients of all ages who react to eggwhite are also clinically sensitive. Attention is drawn to a theory which explains why a positive cutaneous test to a food, as eggwhite, may be clinically significant in atopic dermatitis even though the test (wheal reaction) does not reproduce the type of dermatitis being studied. There was no definite evidence, because the number of cases studied is far too small, to indicate that the severity of asthma which may ultimately develop in infants not asthmatic at the time of skin testing is proportional to the strength of the initial reaction to eggwhite.

scholarly journals Persistence of positive skin test 25 years after a penicillin-induced anaphylaxis

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. A87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Carolina D'onofrio-Silva ◽  
Eduardo Longen ◽  
Marcelo Vivolo Aun ◽  
Marisa Rosimeire Ribeiro ◽  
Laila Sabino Garro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skin Test ◽  
Positive Skin Test ◽  
Positive Skin

Neue Charakteristika klinisch manifester Latexallergiker

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-31
Author(s):  
Vera Mahler
Keyword(s):  
Medical History ◽  
Skin Test ◽  
Correct Diagnosis ◽  
Natural Rubber Latex ◽  
Specific Ige ◽  
Latex Allergy ◽  
Skin Tests ◽  
Diagnostic Challenge ◽  
Positive Skin ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Natural rubber latex (NRL) allergy is commonly diagnosed according to medical history, skin allergy tests, and serological analyses. However, skin tests are increasingly being abandoned because of (i) their time-consuming nature, (ii) latex preparations for skin tests being not commercially available, and (iii) the use of in-house prepared test solutions is becoming ever more difficult due to increasing regulatory hurdles. In this light, we have evaluated differences in the profiles of current and former patients with suspected latex allergy. Methods: Sera of skin test-positive patients from a historic cohort (1995-2001, n = 149 patients) and currently (2014-2015, n = 48 patients) were simultaneously analyzed for specific IgE to latex by ImmunoCAP. If the serological screening was positive (≥ 0.35 kU/l), component-resolved diagnostics including profilins and cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCDs) were performed. Results: In contrast to 88% (131/149) of the skin test-positive patients from the 1990s, only 51.1% (24/47) of the current cohort were found positive for specific IgE to latex. While 48.3% (72/149) of the patients had a convincing positive history in the 1990s, current skin test-positive patients rarely reported a relevant medical history (8.5%, 4/47). Specific IgE levels to latex were significantly higher in former patients with suspected latex allergy (p < 0.001) than in former sensitized individuals without allergy. However, this significant difference was lost in current allergic and sensitized patients with positive skin tests. Conclusion: Sensitization profiles in patients with latex allergy have changed significantly over the last 2 decades. Discrimination between NRL sensitization and clinical allergy remains a diagnostic challenge. Our data highlight the need for a combination of all 3 criteria, i.e., patient history, skin test, and analysis of specific IgE, for a correct diagnosis of latex allergy.

scholarly journals Stress and anxiety effects on positive skin test responses in young adults with allergic rhinitis

2014 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathi L. Heffner ◽  
Janice K. Kiecolt-Glaser ◽  
Ronald Glaser ◽  
William B. Malarkey ◽  
Gailen D. Marshall
Keyword(s):  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
Skin Test ◽  
Positive Skin Test ◽  
Positive Skin
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document