Day Care for the Child Born Prematurely

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 189-192
Author(s):  
Ruth T. Gross

The Infant Health and Development Program (IHDP) has contributed to our knowledge of the role of high-quality, educational day care in the lives of children with special needs. The IHDP was a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of a comprehensive early intervention program in improving the health and developmental outcomes of low birth weight (LBW), premature infants. One component of this program was the provision of special day-care centers for the children receiving this intervention. The rationale for the IHDP was based, on the one hand, on documented need. Low birth weight children are known to be at risk for a variety of medical complications in the first year of life.1-3 Thereafter, the major area of risk is delayed cognitive development, which often leads to difficulties in learning and school achievement.4-6 An increased risk for behavior problems might exacerbate these school-related difficulties.7-9 The outcomes of LBW infants have been the subject of several recent reviews.2,10-12 On the other hand, there was some evidence of effectiveness of early interventions for LBW infants, although these tended to be reports of early outcomes at single sites.13,14 More compelling was the evidence of longer-range improvement in cognitive development resulting from comprehensive early interventions for disadvantaged children of normal birth weight14,15 Given the increasing survival of premature infants, including those of very low birth weight, it was considered important to test the efficacy of such an intervention for this at-risk population in a randomized trial. The models for the IHDP were two longitudinal comprehensive programs, Abecedarian and Project CARE,16 which combined home visits, parent support, and a comprehensive educational curriculum within special day-care centers.

2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 373-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk ◽  
Linda Alpert-Gillis ◽  
Nancy Fischbeck Feinstein ◽  
Eileen Fairbanks ◽  
Jaclyn Schultz-Czarniak ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 454-465
Author(s):  
Craig T. Ramey ◽  
Donna M. Bryant ◽  
Barbara H. Wasik ◽  
Joseph J. Sparling ◽  
Kaye H. Fendt ◽  
...  

The Infant Health and Development Program was an eight-site randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of early intervention to enhance the cognitive, behavioral, and health status of low birth weight, premature infants. The 377 intervention families received for the first 3 years of life: (1) pediatric follow-up, (2) home visits, (3) parent support groups, and (4) a systematic educational program provided in specialized child development centers. The control group (n = 608) received the same pediatric follow-up and referral services only. This paper describes the delivery of the intervention and its outcomes. A Family Participation Index that was the sum of participation frequencies in each of the program modalities unique to the intervention revealed that program implementation was not different across the eight sites. Index scores did not vary systematically with mother's ethnicity, age, or education or with child's birth weight, gender, or neonatal health status; but they were positively related to children's IQ scores at age 3. Only 1.9% of children of families in the highest tercile of participation scored in the mentally retarded range (IQ ≤70), whereas 3.5% and 13% of children in the middle and lowest participation terciles, respectively, scored in the retarded range. Similar findings were obtained for borderline intellectual functioning. These findings are consistent with previous research linking intensity of intervention services with degree of positive cognitive outcomes for high-risk infants. The determinants of variations in individual family participation remain unknown.


2008 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. CMPed.S980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeo Fujiwara ◽  
Makiko Okuyama ◽  
Haley Tsui ◽  
Karestan C. Koenen

Background The association between birth outcomes and child maltreatment remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to test whether infants without congenital or chronic disease who are low birth weight (LBW), preterm, or small for gestational age (SGA) are at an increased risk of being maltreated. Methods A hospital-based case-control study of infants without congenital or chronic diseases who visited the National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, between April 1, 2002 and March 31, 2005 was conducted. Cases (N = 35) and controls (N = 29) were compared on mean birth weight, gestational age, and z-score of birth weight. Results SGA was significantly associated with infant maltreatment after adjusting for other risk factors (adjusted odds ratio: 4.45, 95% CI: 1.29–15.3). LBW and preterm births were not associated with infant maltreatment. Conclusion Infants born as SGA are 4.5 times more at risk of maltreatment, even if they do not have a congenital or chronic disease. This may be because SGA infants tend to have poorer neurological development which leads them to be hard-to-soothe and places them at risk for maltreatment. Abbreviations SCAN, Suspected Child Abuse and Neglect; LBW, low birth weight; ZBW, z-score of birth weight adjusted for gestational age, sex, and parity; SGA, small for gestational age; SD, standard deviation; OR, odds ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; IPV, intimate partner violence.


1992 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 708-710 ◽  
Author(s):  
CRAIG T. RAMEY ◽  
DONNA M. BRYANT ◽  
BARBARA H. WASIK ◽  
JOSEPH J. SPARLING ◽  
KAYE H. FENDT ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document