scholarly journals Arrodált gyomorgyűrűk kezelése – irodalmi áttekintés egy eset kapcsán

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 66-70
Author(s):  
Zsolt Baranyai ◽  
Keresztély Merkel ◽  
Miklós Horváth ◽  
István Hritz ◽  
Attila Szijártó
Keyword(s):  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Port Infection ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Greater Curvature ◽  
Laparoscopic Removal ◽  
Incision Drainage

Összefoglaló. Bevezetés: 70 éves férfi beteg kóros kövérség (BMI: 50,1) miatt 2005-ben gyomorgyűrű beültetésben részesült. 2020 decemberében hasfali phlegmone hátterében igazolt port infekció miatt más intézetben subcutan incisió, lavage történt. CT-vizsgálattal, majd gasztroszkóppal a gyomorgyűrű arrosióját, intramurális elhelyezkedését igazoltuk. A műtét során laparoszkópos technikával a gyomor corpus nagygörbületén ejtett, kb. 2 cm nagyságú nyíláson keresztül távolítottuk el a gyűrűt. A beteg szövődménymentesen került emisszióra. Megbeszélés: Mintegy 20 évvel ezelőtt a laparoszkópos állítható gyomorgyűrű (LAGB) rendkívül népszerű volt. A LAGB azonban számtalan rövid és hosszú távú szövődménnyel jár, ezért egyre inkább kikerül a bariátriai sebészet tárházából. A gyűrű arrosiója ritka, súlyos szövődmény. Eltávolításának többféle módja lehet. A gyomorgyűrű eltávolítása általában a testsúly jelentős növekedésével jár. A betegeknél konverziós bariátriai műtétet, laparoszkópos gyomor sleeve reszekciót, vagy gyomor bypass műtétet lehet végezni. Summary. Introduction: Extreme obese (BMI: 50.1) 70 year old male patient after LAGB procedure in 2005, with abdominal wall and port infection underwent subcutaneous incision drainage of the area in December 2020. CT and Gastroscopy confirmed gastric penetration and intramural position of the Band. Using laparoscopic approach with incision of 2 cm of the stomach at the gastric greater curvature the band had been removed. Patient had been discharged without any complications. Discussion: LAGB was a very popular bariatric approach at the first decade of laparoscopic bariatric surgery. The increased incidence of short and long term complications reduced worldwide the number of LAGB procedures. Band penetration is a rare but dangerous complication. Laparoscopic removal is recommended. Usually, the intervention is followed by significant weight gain which can be treated with conversion of LAGB to Sleeve Gastrectomy or LGBP procedure.

scholarly journals 1139 Effectiveness of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Vs Sleeve Gastrectomy in Short- And Long-Term Weight Loss – A Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A A Jothi
Keyword(s):  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Gastric Bypass ◽  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass ◽  
Mini Gastric Bypass ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Efficient Treatment ◽  
Short And Long Term

Abstract Aim Bariatric surgery has been the most efficient treatment option for moderate to severe obesity. Recently, the sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become the most widely performed bariatric surgery. However, the one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has exponentially increased recently and is associated with excellent short- and long-term weight loss benefits. Hence, the aim of this review is to compare the effectiveness of OAGB vs SG in short- (≤ 1 year) and long-term (> 1 year) weight loss. Method A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases were conducted. Search criteria included keywords such as one-anastomosis gastric bypass, mini-gastric bypass, omega-loop gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, short-term weight loss and long-term weight loss. Selection criteria included any randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing the effects of OAGB vs SG in weight loss, published from the years 2010 onwards. Only full text studies and papers published in English language were chosen. Results nine studies were selected to be reviewed in this study. 62.5% of studies which had reports for short-term weight loss showed that OAGB was able to achieve a significantly greater % excess weight loss (%EWL) or % excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) (P < 0.05). Whereas 80% of studies which had reports for long-term weight loss showed that OAGB achieved a significantly greater %EWL or %EBMIL, up to five years. Conclusions This review suggests that OAGB is associated with significantly greater short-and long-term weight loss than SG. However, due to the small number of RCTs on OAGB vs SG, more long-term RCTs should be conducted for greater evaluation.

scholarly journals INTESTINAL MALROTATION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING BARIATRIC SURGERY

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 24-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Arevalo VIDAL ◽  
Francisco Abarca RENDON ◽  
Trino Andrade ZAMBRANO ◽  
Yudoco Andrade GARCÍA ◽  
Mario Ferrin VITERI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Intestinal Malrotation ◽  
Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Single Anastomosis Gastric Bypass ◽  
Single Anastomosis ◽  
History Of ◽  
Upper Abdomen

ABSTRACT Background: Intestinal malrotation is a rare congenital anomaly. In adults is very difficult to recognize due to the lack of symptoms. Diagnosis is usually incidental during surgical procedures or at autopsy. Aim: To review the occurrence and recognition of uneventful intestinal malrotation discovered during regular cases of bariatric surgeries. Methods: Were retrospectively reviewed the medical registry of 20,000 cases undergoing bariatric surgery, from January 2002 to January 2016, looking for the occurrence of intestinal malrotation and consequences in the intraoperative technique and immediate evolution of the patients. Results: Five cases (0,025%) of intestinal malrotation were found. All of them were males, aging 45, 49, 37,52 and 39 years; BMI 35, 42, 49, 47 and 52 kg/m2, all of them with a past medical history of morbid obesity. The patient with BMI 35 kg/m2 suffered from type 2 diabetes also. All procedures were completed by laparoscopic approach, with no conversions. In one patient was not possible to move the jejunum to the upper abdomen in order to establish the gastrojejunostomy and a sleeve gastrectomy was performed. In another patient was not possible to fully recognize the anatomy due to bowel adhesions and a single anastomosis gastric bypass was preferred. No leaks or bleeding were identified. There were no perioperative complications. All patients were discharged 72 h after the procedure and no immediate 30-day complications were reported. Conclusion: Patients with malrotation can successfully undergo laparoscopic bariatric surgery. May be necessary changes in the surgical original strategy regarding the malrotation. Surgeons must check full abdominal anatomical condition prior to start the division of the stomach.

scholarly journals Long-Term Quality of Life Outcomes After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass—a Comparative Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Fiorani ◽  
Sophie R. Coles ◽  
Myutan Kulendran ◽  
Emma Rose McGlone ◽  
Marcus Reddy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Gastric Bypass ◽  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Metabolic Effects ◽  
Life Outcomes ◽  
Post Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Comorbidity Resolution

Abstract Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) have been shown to improve metabolic comorbidities as well as quality of life (QoL) in the obese population. The vast majority of previous studies have investigated the metabolic effects of bariatric surgery and there is a dearth of studies examining long-term QoL outcomes post bariatric surgery. The outcomes of 43 patients who underwent bariatric surgery were prospectively assessed, using BAROS questionnaires to quantify QoL and metabolic status pre-operatively, at 1 year and at 8 years. Total weight loss and comorbidity resolution were similar between RYGB and SG. The RYGB cohort experienced greater QoL improvement from baseline and had higher BAROS scores at 8 years. RYGB may provide more substantial and durable long-term benefits as compared to SG.

scholarly journals Bariatric surgery in patients with type 1 diabetes: special considerations are warranted

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 204201881882220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zohar Landau ◽  
Galit Kowen-Sandbank ◽  
Daniela Jakubowicz ◽  
Asnat Raziel ◽  
Nasser Sakran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Diabetic Ketoacidosis ◽  
Glucose Control ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
The Mean

Objective: We examined short and long-term outcomes of bariatric surgery in patients with obesity and type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Methods: We reviewed the records of all adults insured by Maccabi Healthcare Services during 2010 -2015, with body mass index (BMI) ⩾30 kg/m2 and T1DM; and compared weight reduction and glucose control according to the performance of bariatric surgery. BMI and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were extracted for baseline and every 6 months, for a mean 3.5 years. Results: Of 52 patients, 26(50%) underwent bariatric surgery. Those who underwent surgery were more often female and with a longer duration of diabetes. Immediately postoperative, 4(15%) developed diabetic ketoacidosis, while 6(23%) experienced severe hypoglycemic episodes. The mean BMI decreased among surgery patients: from 39.5±4.4 to 30.1±5.0 kg/m2 ( p < 0.0001); and increased among those who did not undergo surgery: from 33.6±3.9 to 35.1±4.4 kg/m2 ( p = 0.49). The mean HbA1c level decreased during the first 6 months postoperative: from 8.5±0.9% to 7.9±0.9%; however, at the end of follow-up, was similar to baseline, 8.6±2.0% (p = 0.87). For patients who did not undergo surgery, the mean HbA1c increased from 7.9±1.9% to 8.6±1.5% ( p = 0.09). Conclusions: Among individuals with obesity and T1DM, weight loss was successful after bariatric surgery, but glucose control did not improve. The postoperative risks of diabetic ketoacidosis and severe hypoglycemic episodes should be considering when performing bariatric surgery in this population.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Removal of Angelchik Prosthesis Followed by Interval Sleeve Gastrectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Faryal G. Afridi ◽  
Morgan Johnson ◽  
Kelsey A. Musgrove ◽  
Salim Abunnaja ◽  
Lawrence E. Tabone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Esophageal Motility ◽  
Esophageal Manometry ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Antireflux Procedure ◽  
Bariatric Clinic ◽  
Work Up ◽  
Laparoscopic Removal

Introduction. The Angelchik prosthesis (AP) is a historic antireflux device which consists of a C-shaped silicone ring placed around the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and secured by Dacron tape. We present a rare experience with an AP and its impact on bariatric surgical outcomes. Case. Our patient is a 66-year-old woman who had an open antireflux procedure with an AP in 1987. She presented to a bariatric clinic for consideration of bariatric surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity and associated comorbidities. She also reported significant problems with reflux and dysphagia. After an appropriate work-up, an AP was identified at her GEJ. She was taken to the operating room for laparoscopic removal with planned interval laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Intraoperatively, the AP was identified around the GEJ; after extensive adhesiolysis, the prosthesis was removed. Postoperatively, in order to determine if the AP had caused any lasting esophageal motility problems, the patient underwent a high-resolution esophageal manometry which demonstrated normal esophageal motility. Interval laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy was performed safely 9 weeks later. Conclusion. Although rarely used, it is still possible to encounter an Angelchik prosthesis in practice. General and bariatric surgeons need to be aware of this rare device and understand how to manage its related complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document