Strained Silicon On Insulator wafers made by the Smart Cut™ technology

2004 ◽  
Vol 809 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Ghyselen ◽  
Y. Bogumilowicz ◽  
C. Aulnette ◽  
A. Abbadie ◽  
B. Osternaud ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTStrained Silicon On Insulator wafers are today envisioned as a natural and powerfulenhancement to standard SOI and/or bulk-like strained Si layers. For MOSFETs applications, thisnew technology potentially combines enhanced devices scalability allowed by thin films andenhanced electron and hole mobility in strained silicon. This paper is intended to demonstrate byexperimental results how a layer transfer technique such as the Smart Cut™ technology can be usedto obtain good quality tensile Strained Silicon On insulator wafers. Detailed experiments andcharacterizations will be used to characterize these engineered substrates and show that they arecompatible with the applications.


Author(s):  
Mehdi Asheghi

There have been many attempts in the recent years to improve the device performance by enhancing carrier mobility by using the strained-induced changes in silicon electronic bands [1–4] or reducing the junction capacitance in silicon-on-insulator (SOI) technology. Strained silicon on insulator (SSOI) is another promising technology, which is expected to show even higher performance, in terms of speed and power consumption, comparing to the regular strained-Si transistors. In this technology, the strained silicon is incorporated in the silicon on insulator (SOI) technology such that the strained-Si introduces high mobility for electrons and holes and the insulator layer (usually SiO2) exhibits low junction capacitance due to its small dielectric constant [5, 6]. In these devices a layer of SiGe may exist between the strined-Si layer and insulator (strained Si-on-SiGe-on-insulator, SGOI) [6] or the strained-Si layer can be directly on top of the insulator [7]. Latter is advantageous for eliminating some of the key problems associated with the fabrication of SGOI.



2008 ◽  
Vol 1068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrice Jerome Letertre

ABSTRACTEngineered substrates are expected to play a dominant role in the field of modern nano-electronic and optoelectronic technologies. For example, engineered substrates like SOI (Silicon On Insulator) make possible efficient optimization of transistors' current drive while minimizing the leakage and reducing parasitic elements, thus enhancing the overall IC performance in terms of speed or power consumption. Other generations of engineered substrates like strained SOI (sSOI) provide solutions to traditional scaling for 32 nm node and beyond [1] technologies.The Smart Cutä technology, introduced in the mid 1990's by M. Bruel [2] is a revolutionnary and powerful thin film technology for bringing to industrial maturity engineered substrate solutions. It is a combination of wafer bonding and layer transfer via the use of ion implantation. It allows multiple high quality transfers of thin layers, from a single crystal donor wafer onto another substrate of a different nature, allowing the integration of dissimilar materials. As a consequence, it opens the path to the formation of III-V based engineered substrates by integrating, for example, materials like GaAs [3], InP [4], SiC [5], GaN [6], Germanium [7] ,and Si [8 ]on a silicon, poly SiC, sapphire, ceramic, or metal substrates?In this paper, we will review the current wafer bonding and layer transfer technologies with a special emphasis on the Smart Cut technology applied to compound semiconductors. Beyond SOI, the innovation provided by substrate engineering will be illustrated by the case of Silicon and SiC engineered substrate serving as a platform for GaN and related alloys processing [9,10,11,12] as well as the case of Germanium/Si platform for the growth of GaAs/InP materials, opening the path to Si CMOS and III-V microelectronics/ optoelectronics functions hybrid integration [13, 14]. Recent results obtained in these two focused areas will be presented to emphasize the added functionalities offered by engineered substrates.[1] B. Ghyselen et al., ICSI3 proc., 173 5 (2003)[2] M. Bruel et al., Electron. Lett., vol 31, p. 1201 (1995)[3] E. Jalaguier et al., Electron. Lett., 34(4), 408 (1998)[4] E. Jalaguier et al. Proc. llth Intern. Conf. on InP and Related Materials, Davos, Switzerland, (1999)[5] L. Di Cioccio et al., Mat. Sci. and Eng. B Vol. 46, p. 349 (1997)[6] A. Tauzin and al., Semiconductor Wafer Bonding VIII, ECS Proc Vol. 2005-02, pp. 119-127[7] F. Letertre, et al. MRS Symp. Proc., 809, B4.4 (2004).[8] B. Faure et al., Semiconductor Wafer Bonding VIII, ECS Proc Vol. 2005-02, pp. 106-118[9] H. Larèche et al., Mat. Sci. For., Vols. 457–460 pp.. 1621 – 1624 (2004)[10] G. Meneghesso et al , IEDM 2007, to be published[11] Y. Dikme et al., Journal of Crystal Growth, v.272 (1-4), pp. 500-505 (2004)[12] J. Dorsaz and al., Proceedings, ICNS6 (2005)[13] S.G. Thomas et al., IEEE EDL Vol. 26, July 2005.[14] K. Chilukuri, Semi. Sci. Technol. 22 (2007) 29-34



2007 ◽  
Vol 90 (23) ◽  
pp. 231909 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Himcinschi ◽  
M. Reiche ◽  
R. Scholz ◽  
S. H. Christiansen ◽  
U. Gösele


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 317-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manfred Reiche ◽  
Ionut Radu ◽  
Cameliu Himcinschi ◽  
Rajendra Singh ◽  
Silke Christiansen ◽  
...  


2003 ◽  
Vol 336 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 344-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinyun Xie ◽  
Weili Liu ◽  
Qing Lin ◽  
Chuanling Men ◽  
Chenglu Lin


2005 ◽  
Vol 239 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 327-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Zhu ◽  
Peng Chen ◽  
Ricky K.Y. Fu ◽  
Weili Liu ◽  
Chenglu Lin ◽  
...  


2010 ◽  
Vol 157 (1) ◽  
pp. H81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xing Wei ◽  
Aimin Wu ◽  
Xiang Wang ◽  
Xianyuan Li ◽  
Fei Ye ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document