scholarly journals 3 Identification of managerial problem

2021 ◽  
pp. 44-55
Author(s):  
Tetiana Kozhukhova ◽  
Yuliia Bocharova ◽  
Lyubov Shevchenko ◽  
Olena Nieizviestna
Keyword(s):  
1994 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 53-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Brooks

1972 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dale E. Zand

1984 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 547-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Edwards ◽  
Hugh Scullion

The ‘individual’ forms of industrial conflict, such as absenteeism, have received little attention in industrial sociology. This paper attempts to correct this deficiency by attacking the conventional approach to these phenomena and by using recent research findings to develop a sociological alternative. The main characteristics of the conventional approach are the focus on absenteeism without reference to the patterns of work relations of which it is part, and a treatment of it as a ‘problem’ which requires a remedy. The weakness of the approach is that neither the social meaning of absence nor the structural context of work organization is investigated. The alternative approach examines absence as part of a set of workplace relations and is thus able to explore how far, in what ways, and with what consequences it represents a form of conflict. In combination with other recent studies of the links between absence and the contingencies of individual workers' situations, a more adequate sociological treatment is possible. This approach is, ironically, better able to grasp the managerial problem of absence and workplace control than is the ‘managerialist’ conventional approach.


2017 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Bayan Yousef Farhan ◽  

The purpose of this paper is to contribute to a better understanding of action research methodology as a managerial tool. A practical example was employed to explain the dynamic process of action research and its role in understanding a managerial problem: observe, reflect, plan, & act. This paper argues that the implementation of this tool in organizations can be considered as a foundation for managerial problem solving. Employing action research can facilitate the crafting of appropriate strategies and lead to highly desirable results, and thus three points should be recognized: (1) the intention in a given situation is to get a deep understanding and to construct a social reality based on participants’ perceptions; (2) involving managers to help in understanding what might be done to improve the situation and what action should be implemented to overcome the problem; (3) implementing the recommended solutions (action), as well as repeating and evaluating the process is to be considered the cornerstone to improve an undesired situation.


Author(s):  
Papadopoulou Eleni-Maria

Supply chain complexity is reflected through the existence of multiple logistics service providers (LSPs). The decision on the appropriate logistics partner is considered significant for the chain efficiency. The managerial problem relies in the providers’ efforts to broaden their service portfolio, thus erasing controversies concerning the identification of their core competences. This issue mainly lies in the selection among an International Freight Forwarder (IFF), a Third Party Logistics Provider (3PL), and a Fourth Party Logistics Provider (4PL). The aim of this chapter is to provide an overview of the characteristics and services offered by the LSPs, present the benefits and drawbacks from the collaboration with each entity, and finally form a framework regarding their representative features. The framework is articulated based on literature review and aims to provide a guideline to the interested chain members, enabling them to assess their needs against the LSPs’ characteristics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document