Microthreaded Implants and Crestal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad M. Al-Thobity ◽  
Ahmad Kutkut ◽  
Khalid Almas
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Implant Design ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Machined Surface ◽  
Crestal Bone Loss ◽  
Bone Level

This systematic literature review investigated the effect of microthreaded-neck dental implants on crestal bone loss. Using the participants, interventions, comparison groups, outcomes, and study design (PICO) system, we addressed the following focused question: Do microthreaded-neck dental implants positively affect the crestal bone level around dental implants? We searched 3 electronic databases to find articles published between January 1995 and June 2016 that contained any combination of the following keywords: dental implant, microthread, microthreaded, crestal bone level, crestal bone loss, and alveolar bone level. We excluded case reports, review articles, letters to the editor, commentaries, and articles published in a language other than English. We found a total of 70 articles. After eliminating duplicates and applying PICO eligibility criteria, we selected only articles that reported the results of randomized controlled trials, prospective or retrospective cohort studies, case control studies, cross-sectional studies, or other types of clinical trials that compared the microthreaded implant design with other implant designs. We were left with 23 articles for review. The 23 articles reported crestal bone loss ranging from .05 mm to .9 mm, with a range of 12 to 96 months of follow-up. Less crestal bone was lost with dental implants that had a microthreaded neck design than with machined-surface or conventional rough-surface dental implants. Thus, microthreaded dental implants are a better choice than are implants with other designs. Future studies should use standardized imaging techniques to evaluate the placement of these implants in bone-augmented sites.

scholarly journals Dental Implant Surrounding Marginal Bone Level Evaluation: Platform Switching versus Platform Matching—One-Year Retrospective Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eisner Salamanca ◽  
Jerry C.-Y. Lin ◽  
Chi-Yang Tsai ◽  
Yung-Szu Hsu ◽  
Haw-Ming Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implants ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Crestal Bone Loss ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Platform Switching ◽  
Marginal Bone Level ◽  
One Year ◽  
Bone Gain ◽  
Evaluation Platform ◽  
Vertical Gap

The benefits and feasibility of platform switching have been discussed in several studies, reporting lesser crestal bone loss in platform-switched implants than in platform-matched implants. Objective. The aim of the present study was to observe the changes in vertical and horizontal marginal bone levels in platform-switched and platform-matched dental implants. Materials and Methods. 51 patients received 60 dental implants in the present study over a 1-year period. Measurement was performed between the implant shoulder and the most apical and horizontal marginal defect by periapical radiographs to examine the changes of peri-implant alveolar bone before and 12 months after prosthodontic restoration delivery. Results. These marginal bone measurements showed a bone gain of 0.23±0.58 mm in the vertical gap and 0.22±0.53 mm in the horizontal gap of platform matching, while in platform switching a bone gain of 0.93±1 mm (P<0.05) in the vertical gap and 0.50±0.56 mm in the horizontal gap was found. The average vertical gap reduction from the baseline until 12 months was 0.92±1.11 mm in platform switching and 0.29±0.85 mm in platform matching (P<0.05). Conclusions. Within the limitations of the present study, platform switching seemed to be more effective for a better peri-implant alveolar bone vertical and horizontal gap reduction at 1 year.

scholarly journals Changes in alveolar bone support induced by the Herbst appliance: a tomographic evaluation

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Paulo Schwartz ◽  
Taisa Boamorte Raveli ◽  
Humberto Osvaldo Schwartz-Filho ◽  
Dirceu Barnabé Raveli
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Alveolar Bone Loss ◽  
T Test ◽  
Bone Thickness ◽  
Herbst Appliance ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Dependent Samples ◽  
Mandibular Incisors

ABSTRACT Objective: This study evaluated alveolar bone loss around mandibular incisors, induced by the Herbst appliance. Methods: The sample consisted of 23 patients (11 men, 12 women; mean age of 15.76 ± 1.75 years), Class II, Division 1 malocclusion, treated with the Herbst appliance. CBCT scans were obtained before treatment (T0) and after Herbst treatment (T1). Vertical alveolar bone level and alveolar bone thickness of mandibular incisors were assessed. Buccal (B), lingual (L) and total (T) bone thicknesses were assessed at crestal (1), midroot (2) and apical (3) levels of mandibular incisors. Student's t-test and Wilcoxon t-test were used to compare dependent samples in parametric and nonparametric cases, respectively. Pearson's and Spearman's rank correlation analyses were performed to determine the relationship of changes in alveolar bone thickness. Results were considered at a significance level of 5%. Results: Mandibular incisors showed no statistical significance for vertical alveolar bone level. Alveolar bone thickness of mandibular incisors significantly reduced after treatment at B1, B2, B3, T1 and significantly increased at L2. The magnitude of the statistically significant changes was less than 0.2 mm. The changes in alveolar bone thickness showed no statistical significance with incisor inclination degree. Conclusions: CBCT scans showed an association between the Herbst appliance and alveolar bone loss on the buccal surface of mandibular incisors; however, without clinical significance.

scholarly journals Vertical bone augmentation of posterior mandibular region: a description of two surgical techniques

2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 333-336
Author(s):  
Adalmir Gonzaga dos Santos QUEIROZ ◽  
Yuri Slusarenko da SILVA ◽  
Pedro Jorge Cavalcante COSTA ◽  
Flávio Wellington da Silva FERRAZ ◽  
Maria da Graça NACLÉRIO-HOMEM
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
The Other ◽  
Bone Maturation ◽  
Oral Rehabilitation ◽  
Autologous Graft ◽  
Mandibular Region ◽  
Graft Interposition

ABSTRACT Correction of severe vertical bone deficiency in the posterior region of mandibular alveolar ridge requires surgical management if implants are scheduled and cannot have primary stability. The aim of the present study is to report two cases; one treated with alveolar osteogenesis distraction and the other with segmental osteotomy with autologous graft interposition, by describing the surgical steps as well as show the results and experiences acquired with these techniques. We opted for these methods to reconstruct the posterior mandibular region after remarkable vertical bone loss based mainly by the height and thickness of the remaining bone. Alveolar osteogenic distraction is highly advisable when vertical deficiency is severe, and if these cases are treated with the segmental osteotomy and autologous graft interposition, complications as graft failure, necrosis and resorption are more prone to occur due to insufficient vascularization. After bone maturation and bone neoformation secondary to alveolar osteogenic osteogenic distraction and segmental osteotomy with autologous graft interposition, respectively, the two presented case reports were able to securely receive dental implants. In cases of vertical bone loss of the posterior mandibular region, both surgeries currently represent the best choice for bone gain prior dental implants placement for oral rehabilitation, without technical challenges, although biological evidence to assure the superiority of one technique over the other must be further investigated.

scholarly journals Clinical outcomes of dental implants placed in the same region where previous implants failed due to peri-implantitis: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Anitua ◽  
Adriana Montalvillo ◽  
Asier Eguia ◽  
Mohammad Hamdan Alkhraisat
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
High Survival ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Bone Level

Abstract Purpose There is paucity in the studies that assess dental implants replacing failed dental implants due to peri-implantitis. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of these implants in terms of implant survival and marginal bone loss. Methods Patients in this retrospective study were selected if having one or more implants removed due to peri-implantitis and the placement and loading of dental implants in the same region from April 2010 to December 2019. Information was collected about the patient's demographic data, implant dimensions, surgical and prosthetic variables. Changes in peri-implant bone level, cumulative implant survival rate and technical complications were assessed. Results Three hundred and eighty one dental implants in 146 patients that were placed in the same position or one-tooth position mesially/distally to the site of explantation were included. The patients' mean age was 63 ± 10 years. Ninety seven patients were females and 49 were males. After a mean follow-up of 34 ± 17 months, two implants failed. The cumulative survival rate was 99%. The marginal bone loss was −0.1 ± 0.6. Immediate or delay replacement of the failed implant did not affect implant survival or marginal bone stability. All the prostheses were screw-retained and presented the following complications: ceramic chipping (3 events), resin tooth fracture (1 event) and prosthetic screw loosening (1 event). Conclusions Dental implants replacing failed implants due to peri-implantitis would be an option in the management of peri-implantitis. They showed high survival rate and marginal bone stability.

scholarly journals Bone Loss around Dental Implants 5 Years after Implantation of Biphasic Calcium Phosphate (HAp/βTCP) Granules

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vadims Klimecs ◽  
Alexanders Grishulonoks ◽  
Ilze Salma ◽  
Laura Neimane ◽  
Janis Locs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Biphasic Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Clinical Situation ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Calcium Phosphate Ceramic ◽  
Middle Point

Biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic granules (0.5–1.0 mm) with a hydroxyapatite and β-tricalcium phosphate ratio of 90/10 were used. Biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic granules produced in the Riga Technical University, Riga Rudolph Cimdins Biomaterials Innovation and Development Centre, were used for filling the bone loss on 18 patients with peri-implantitis. After 5 years at the minimum, clinical and 3D cone-beam computed tomography control was done. Clinical situation confirmed good stability of implants without any signs of inflammation around. Radiodensity of the previous gap and alveolar bone horizontally from middle point of dental implants showed similar radiodensity as in normal alveolar bone. This trial is registered with ISRCTN13514478.

scholarly journals Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants Restored with Zirconium vis-à-vis Porcelain Fused to Metal: An In Vivo Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 17-21
Author(s):  
Udey Singh Wirring ◽  
Tarun Kalra ◽  
Manjit Kumar ◽  
Ajay Bansal ◽  
Aquib Javaid
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Zirconia Crowns ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Introduction Marginal bone level is the criterion for implant success. Patient expectations for more natural looking implant restorations created the need to restore implants with more esthetically pleasing materials like Zirconia rather than conventional porcelain-fused to-metal (PFM) crowns. The aim of this study was to evaluate marginal bone loss around dental implants clinically and radiographically when restored with Zirconia and PFM prosthesis. Materials and Methods Two groups (control and test) were formed with 14 patients each. In the control group, the subjects were rehabilitated with PFM crowns and in the test group, the subjects were rehabilitated with Zirconia crowns. Rehabilitation was done after the healing period of 3 months. Radiographic evaluation was done at regular (baseline, 3rd, 6th, and 12th month) intervals. Results The results were statistically analyzed. Keeping in mind the limitations of the study, it was revealed that the difference in the crestal bone resorption in both the groups was not significant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document