The Norwegian HEXACO-PI-R: Psychometric properties and relationships with the Big Five Inventory

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Ørnfjord ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 117 ◽  
pp. 122-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anikó Lovik ◽  
Vahid Nassiri ◽  
Geert Verbeke ◽  
Geert Molenberghs ◽  
An Katrien Sodermans

Salud Mental ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernesto Reyes Zamorano ◽  
Carolina Álvarez Carrillo ◽  
Ana Peredo Silva ◽  
Ana Miranda Sandoval ◽  
Itzel Montzerrat Rebolledo Pastrana

Antecedentes. Una de las teorías de la personalidad más estudiadas es el modelo de los cinco factores, frecuentemente evaluado por medio del Inventario de los Cinco Grandes. A pesar de que existe una versión en español, aún se desconocen las características psicométricas de dicho instrumento en población mexicana. Método. Se evaluaron 472 adultos (217 hombres/255 mujeres) de población abierta de la Ciudad de México. Resultados. La confiabilidad fue de ?=0.72 para toda la escala. Por medio de un Análisis de Componentes Principales, replicamos la estructura de cinco factores de la prueba. También encontramos diferencias entre los sujetos que reportaron haber recibido alguna vez un diagnóstico psiquiátrico o neurológico por un profesionista de la salud y los que no, en las escalas de agradabilidad, responsabilidad y neuroticismo. Conclusiones. Nuestros resultados sugieren que el Inventario de los Cinco Factores es útil para evaluar la personalidad en población mexicana. Sin embargo, una revisión de la escala de agradabilidad puede ser necesaria dada su baja confiabilidad y mala carga factorial de los reactivos que la componen.


2019 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaap J. A. Denissen ◽  
Rinie Geenen ◽  
Christopher J. Soto ◽  
Oliver P. John ◽  
Marcel A. G. van Aken

2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatrice Rammstedt

Abstract. The 10-Item Big Five Inventory (BFI-10; Rammstedt & John, 2007 ), a short scale version of the well-established BFI, was developed to provide a personality inventory for research settings with extreme time constraints. It allows assessing the Big Five by only two items per dimension. Previous research has clearly shown that the BFI-10 possesses psychometric properties that are comparable in size and structure to those of the full-scale BFI. Based on data from a large sample representative of the German adult population, the present study aimed to provide norms for the total sample and for subsamples depending on different sociodemographic variables and to investigate effects of gender, age, and education on the BFI-10. Results indicate that the sociodemographic effects found in the German representative sample clearly replicate those of previous research conducted in that field.


Author(s):  
Sonia Brito Costa ◽  
Pedro Bem-Haja ◽  
Ana Moisao ◽  
Alfonso Alberty ◽  
Florencio Vicente Castro ◽  
...  

Os dois estudos da presente investigação tiveram como “Conceptual framework” o modelo dos 5 fatores de Costa and McCrae (1987). Num primeiro estudo, traduziu e adaptou-se para a população portuguesa o Big Five Inventory (BFI) de John, Donahue, & Kentle (1991), modificado por Jonh & Srivastava (1999), avaliando a consistência interna e a estabilidade temporal. Num segundo estudo, o objetivo foi avaliar a estrutura fatorial (validade fatorial) e a validade de critério pela comparação concorrente com um instrumento paralelo já validado para Portugal, o Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI), adaptado e validado por Lima e Castro (2009). Neste 2º estudo pretendeu-se, ainda, verificar novamente o comportamento da consistência interna. Após o primeiro estudo, o BFI passou a designar-se por Inventário dos Cinco Grandes Fatores da Personalidade (IGFP5). A amostra do primeiro estudo foi constituída por 150 jogadores de futebol e a do segundo estudo por 369 participantes do mesmo grupo profissional. No primeiro estudo foram obtidos bons valores de consistência interna, sendo confirmada a estabilidade temporal da medida mediante a obtenção de correlações significativas entre o teste e o reteste e a aproximação dos valores absolutos de alfa nos dois momentos. Em relação ao estudo 2, inicialmente foi extraída uma solução com 16 fatores; contudo, após uma análise do screenplot de eigenvalues, a solução fixada foi penta-fatorial e muito próxima, na extração de itens, à validação original e validações de outros países. A validade de critério foi alcançada pela existência de correlações significativas na direção esperada entre os dois questionários aplicados. A consistência interna global manteve, neste segundo estudo, valores dentro do recomendado, exceto para o fator “amabilidade” que, embora perto do aceitável, tem de ser analisado com cuidado. Os resultados demonstraram que a versão portuguesa do BFI, agora designado por IGFP5, possui boas características psicométricas, embora a subescala/fator amabilidade tenha de ser usada com cuidado.


2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Halama ◽  
Michal Kohút ◽  
Christopher J. Soto ◽  
Oliver P. John

Psihologija ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petar Colovic ◽  
Dusanka Mitrovic ◽  
Snezana Smederevac

The main purpose of this study was to evaluate personality dimensions, proposed by Big Five model, in our culture, by the use of the questionnaire FIBI, developed on the basis of the psycho lexical study of personality descriptions in Serbian language (Smederevac, 2000). There were 627 subjects in the study (407 females and 220 males), aged 17 to 77, and the inventory UKL7 (Smederevac, 2000) and the Big Five Inventory (BFI; John, Donahue, Kentle, 1991; John, Srivastava, 1999) were applied. The FIBI inventory was created from UKL7 by exclusion of evaluative items, items of probable artificial factor Emotional control and items with poor psychometric properties were excluded. Final solution with 69 items demonstrated solid psychometric properties. The construct validity of the FIBI has been assessed by examination of its relationship to the Big Five Inventory and results showed that scales Conventionality and Extraversion in those two inventories differ in content. Subscale Conventionality in FIBI was highly related to subscale Consciousness in BFI and showed no significant correlation to Openness to Experience of the BFI. The content of the FIBI's Extraversion scale includes positive self-evaluation, assertiveness and activity. Indicators of sociability, usually considered as dominant (or at least very important) markers of extraverted behavior, were omitted from the FIBI Extraversion scale. These content differences justify application of the emic approach in the personality psychology research. Although there are some other available instruments based on Big Five, FIBI represents product of our cultural background and seems to be worth of further examination and improvement.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-125
Author(s):  
Johannes Schult ◽  
Rebecca Schneider ◽  
Jörn R. Sparfeldt

Abstract. The need for efficient personality inventories has led to the wide use of short instruments. The corresponding items often contain multiple, potentially conflicting descriptors within one item. In Study 1 ( N = 198 university students), the reliability and validity of the TIPI (Ten-Item Personality Inventory) was compared with the reliability and validity of a modified TIPI based on items that rephrased each two-descriptor item into two single-descriptor items. In Study 2 ( N = 268 university students), we administered the BFI-10 (Big Five Inventory short version) and a similarly modified version of the BFI-10 without two-descriptor items. In both studies, reliability and construct validity values occasionally improved for separated multi-descriptor items. The inventories with multi-descriptor items showed shortcomings in some factors of the TIPI and the BFI-10. However, the other scales worked comparably well in the original and modified inventories. The limitations of short personality inventories with multi-descriptor items are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document