scholarly journals Effect of weed management practices on weed control, growth attributes, yield and economics in Rabi groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-312
Author(s):  
T.K. SAMANT ◽  
B.C. DHIR ◽  
B. MOHANTY
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Arachis Hypogaea ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Arachis Hypogaea L ◽  
Control Growth ◽  
Growth Attributes

Survey of Weeds and Management Practices in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in the Savanna Ecology of Ghana1

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. K. Dzomeku ◽  
M. Abudulai ◽  
R. L. Brandenburg ◽  
D. L. Jordan
Keyword(s):  
Arachis Hypogaea ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Cropping Systems ◽  
Cyperus Rotundus ◽  
Striga Hermonthica ◽  
Northern Ghana ◽  
Vernonia Galamensis ◽  
Arachis Hypogaea L ◽  
Tridax Procumbens

Abstract Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is the most popular legume cultivated for food and cash in the Guinea and Sudan savannah ecologies of northern Ghana. A three-year survey was conducted between 2003 and 2005 to: (1) document the prevalence of weed species, (2) determine current cropping systems and weed management practices, and (3) assess the response of peanut to weed management practices. Flora with more than 5% dominance included: (1) the dicotyledonous weeds, Corchorus olitorius L. Commelina benghalensis L., Commelina diffusa Burm., f, Desmodium scorpluras (Sw.) Desv., Hyptis suoveolens Poit., Mimosa invisa Mart., Mimosa pigra L., Mitracarpus villosus (Sw.) DC., Oldenlandia corymbosa L., Phyllanthus amarus Schum. & Thonn., Scoparia dulcis L., Tridax procumbens L., Triumfeta cordiflora A. Rich., and Vernonia galamensis (Cass.) Less.; (2) the monocotyledonous weeds Axonopus compresus (Sw.) P. Beauv., Cyperus esculentus L., Cyperus rotundus L., Digitaria horizontalisWilld., Eragrostis tremula Hochst. Ex Steud., Hackelochloa granularis (L.) O. Ktze., Kyllinga erecta Schumach. Var., Kyllinga squamulata Thonn. Ex Vahl., Paspalum scrobiculatum L., Rottboellia cochinchinensis (Lour.) Clayton, and Setaria pallide-fusca (Schum.) Stapf. & C.E. Hubbard; and (3) the parasitic weed Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth. Land preparation practices included the use of tractors, followed by use of livestock, and lastly hand preparation. Cropping systems consisted of cereals preceding peanut, peanut preceding peanut, and intercropping peanut with sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench.), millet (Pennisetum Americanum L.), or corn (Zea mays L.). Genetically-improved peanut cultivars expressing bunch or erect growth habits were the most common cultivars although some farmers planted local cultivars expressing a distinct runner growth habit. The majority of farmers planted peanut from early June to early July based on rainfall pattern. Eighty-eight percent of peanut fields were hand weeded once, 3 to 5 weeks after planting (WAP) or twice, 2 to 3 and 5 to 6 WAP. Weed management was generally poorly timed and insufficient to prevent significant weed interference resulting in total oven-dried weed biomass ranging from 600 to 2400 kg/ha at harvest. Peanut haulm production ranged from 500 to 5500 kg/ha with improved cultivars. Pod yield production ranged from 200 to 1680 kg/ha. Results from this survey revealed the need for accelerated research and capacity building of farmers and agricultural extension agents for improved technology transfer to the peanut industry in the region.

scholarly journals Efficacy of pre-emergence and post-emergence herbicides for weed management in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) production in Guinea Savannah

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (01) ◽  
pp. 263-276
Author(s):  
Kokonu Kojo Wilfred ◽  
Israel Kwame Dzomeku ◽  
Kugbe Joseph Xorse
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Arachis Hypogaea ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Yield Components ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
High Yield ◽  
Ageratum Conyzoides ◽  
Pod Yield ◽  
Arachis Hypogaea L ◽  
Hand Weeding

Groundnut or peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) has gained prominence as food and cash crop both in the domestic and export markets. In Ghana, the bulk of groundnut is produced in the Guinea savannah zone where it is vulnerable to weed infestation that results in average yields of about 800 kg/ha compared to developed countries of more than 3,000 kg/ha. This experiment was conducted in Tolon during the 2012 farming season to determine the most suitable combination of pre-emergence and post-emergence herbicides and/or hand weeding that could enhance efficient weed control and to assess the treatments that could promote yield and yield components of groundnut. Some local available herbicides and recommended rates used included: Pendimethalin at 0.15 kg a.i./ha, gallant super at 0.03 kg a.i./ha, agil at 0.02 kg a.i./ha, basagran at 0.14 kg a.i./ha. The study was laid out in RCBD with four replications.  Results showed Pendimethalin at 0.15 kg a.i./ha plus gallant super at 0.03 kg a.i/ha at 4 weeks after planting (WAP) recorded the highest pod yield of 2436 kg/ha. All treatments recorded significantly high yield over the Weedy check. Weed biomass correlated negatively (r= -0.5074) with nodulation count while haulm yield showed a positive correlation coefficient of (r=0.4575*) with pod yield. Weed control efficiency of 94.8% showed pendimethalin at 0.15 kg a.i/ha plus agil at 0.02 kg a.i/ha at 4WAP was most effective in weed control. Herbicide application reduced weed index. Basagran at 0.14 kg a.i/ha at 4WAP plus one hand weeding at 7WAP recorded least weed index of 24%. The most dominant weeds were broadleaves such as Ageratum conyzoides (L), Corchorus olitorius (Linn) and Ludwigia abyssinica (A. Rich). Plots with uncontrolled weeds resulted in 69% loss of pod yield. In order of decreasing weed control, yield components and pod yield; Pendimethalin at 0.15 kg a.i./ha plus gallant super at 0.03 kg a.i/ha applied at 4 WAP was more effective than basagran at 0.14 kg a.i/ha at 4WAP plus 1HW at 7WAP and gallant super at 0.03 kg a.i/ha at 4 WAP plus 1HW at 7 WAP; and are recommended in that order to groundnut farmers in the Guinea savanna zone of Ghana.

Weed Management in Small Grains Harvested for Grain

EDIS ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Ferrell ◽  
Gregory MacDonald ◽  
Pratap Devkota
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Chemical Control ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Good Management ◽  
Small Grains ◽  
Crop Competition

Successful weed control in small grains involves using good management practices in all phases of production. In Florida, winter weeds compete with small grains for moisture, nutrients, and light, with the greatest amount of competition occurring during the first six to eight weeks after planting. Weeds also cause harvest problems the following spring when the small grain is mature. This 4-page publication discusses crop competition, knowing your weeds, and chemical control. Written by J. A. Ferrell, G. E. MacDonald, and P. Devkota, and published by the UF/IFAS Agronomy Department, revised May 2020.

Weed Management in Peanuts

EDIS ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pratap Devkota
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Application Rate ◽  
Good Management ◽  
Peanut Production

Successful weed control in peanuts involves use of good management practices in all phases of peanut production. This 11-page document lists herbicide products registered for use in Florida peanut production, their mode of actions group, application rate per acre and per season, and reentry interval. It also discusses the performance of these herbicides on several weeds under Florida conditions. Written by J. A. Ferrell, G. E. MacDonald, and P. Devkota, and published by the UF/IFAS Agronomy Department, revised May 2020.

Weed Management in Southeastern Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with AC 263,222

1996 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
John S. Richburg ◽  
John W. Wilcut ◽  
Daniel L. Colvin ◽  
Gerald R. Wiley
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Arachis Hypogaea ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Common Ragweed ◽  
Yellow Nutsedge ◽  
Application Rates ◽  
Ac 263,222

Field experiments conducted at four locations in Georgia and two locations in Florida during 1992 and 1993 evaluated AC 263,222 application rates and timings, systems, and mixtures for weed control, peanut injury, and yield. All rates of AC 263,222 applied early POST (EPOST) or POST controlledIpomoeamorningglories and smallflower morningglory at least 90%, and purple and yellow nutsedge at least 81%. Florida beggarweed and sicklepod control generally was highest when metolachlor was applied PPI followed by AC 263,222 applied EPOST at 71 g/ha, AC 263,222 at 27 or 36 g/ha plus bentazon plus paraquat applied POST, or with bentazon plus paraquat applied EPOST followed by AC 263,222 applied POST at 36 or 53 g/ha. Acifluorfen and acifluorfen plus bentazon reduced Florida beggarweed and sicklepod control at several locations when applied in mixture with AC 263,222. Common ragweed and hairy indigo control were 85 to 95% with bentazon plus paraquat applied EPOST followed by AC 263,222 applied POST at 36 or 53 g/ha. Highest peanut yields were obtained with treatments providing high levels of weed control.

The Influence of Weed Management in Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Stubble on Weed Control in Corn (Zea mays)

1998 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 522-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore M. Webster ◽  
John Cardina ◽  
Mark M. Loux
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Giant Foxtail ◽  
Giant Ragweed ◽  
Herbicide Treatments ◽  
Postharvest Treatment ◽  
Full Rate ◽  
Wheat Stubble

The objectives of this study were to determine how the timing of weed management treatments in winter wheat stubble affects weed control the following season and to determine if spring herbicide rates in corn can be reduced with appropriately timed stubble management practices. Field studies were conducted at two sites in Ohio between 1993 and 1995. Wheat stubble treatments consisted of glyphosate (0.84 kg ae/ha) plus 2,4-D (0.48 kg ae/ha) applied in July, August, or September, or at all three timings, and a nontreated control. In the following season, spring herbicide treatments consisted of a full rate of atrazine (1.7 kg ai/ha) plus alachlor (2.8 kg ai/ha) preemergence, a half rate of these herbicides, or no spring herbicide treatment. Across all locations, a postharvest treatment of glyphosate plus 2,4-D followed by alachlor plus atrazine at half or full rates in the spring controlled all broadleaf weeds, except giant ragweed, at least 88%. Giant foxtail control at three locations was at least 83% when a postharvest glyphosate plus 2,4-D treatment was followed by spring applications of alachlor plus atrazine at half or full rates. Weed control in treatments without alachlor plus atrazine was variable, although broadleaf control from July and August glyphosate plus 2,4-D applications was greater than from September applications. Where alachlor and atrazine were not applied, August was generally the best timing of herbicide applications to wheat stubble for reducing weed populations the following season.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document