scholarly journals Prevalence of Mastitis and Associated risk factors in Jimma Town Dairy Farms, Western Ethiopia

Author(s):  
Bayush Tesfaye ◽  
Ataro Abera
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Garoma Desa ◽  
Yosef Deneke ◽  
Feyissa Begna ◽  
Tadele Tolosa

A cross-sectional study was conducted on selected dairy farms in and around Jimma town, Oromia, southwestern Ethiopia from November 2019 to May 2020 to determine the seroprevalence of Leptospira interrogans serogroup Sejroe serovar Hardjo (L. hardjo). Furthermore, information was gathered on individual animal and herd level by using pretested semistructured questionnaire to assess associated risk factors. A stratified and simple random sampling procedure was used for the selection of dairy farms and individual animal’s, respectively. Indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA) was used in this study to detect antibody against L. hardjo. Out of 384 animal’s sera, 94 animals were seropositive against L. hardjo antibodies. From 77 dairy farms selected for the study, 57 of them were distinguished as positive for L. hardjo. The overall seroprevalence of leptospirosis caused by L. hardjo was 24.48% (95% CI: 20.18%–28.78%) and 74.03% (95% CI: 64.23%–83.82%) at individual animal and farm level, respectively. The result of multilogistic regression analysis revealed that management system ( p  < 0.05; OR = 4.25 (95% CI: 2.31–7.82)), hygienic status of the farm ( p  < 0.05; OR = 0.35 (95% CI: 0.20–0.61)), age of animals ( p  < 0.05; OR = 8.30 (95% CI: 1.87–36.89)), history of abortion ( p  < 0.05; OR = 8.37 (95% CI: 1.73–40.42)), herd size ( p  < 0.05; OR = 2.32 (95% CI: 1.17–4.61)), and access of rodents to the farm ( p  < 0.05; OR = 0.17 (95% CI: 0.03–0.86)) were significantly associated with the occurrence of L. hardjo infection. However, breed, parity, and introduction of new animals to the farm were insignificantly associated ( p  > 0.05). Management system of the animal, hygienic status of the farm, herd size, age of animals, previous history of abortion, and access of rodents to the farm were identified as potential risk factors of L. hardjo disease occurrence. Thus, limiting rodents contact with cattle and their feed and water as well as good sanitary practices and husbandry management should be undertaken.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
H. Thukral ◽  
P. Dhaka ◽  
J. Singh Bedi ◽  
R. Singh Aulakh

Aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) contamination in milk and milk products may pose a major public health concern. The present cross-sectional study was aimed to estimate the prevalence of AFM1 in bovine milk across all districts of Punjab, India and to identify the associated animal and farm level risk factors. A total of 402 milk samples (266 cow milk and 136 buffalo milk) were analysed using commercial ELISA and representative samples were confirmed using HPLC-FLD. The results revealed that 56.2 and 13.4% of the milk samples exceeded the maximum levels of the European Union, i.e. 0.05 μg/l and Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), i.e. 0.5 μg/l for AFM1 in milk, respectively. On analysis of species variation, buffalo milk (prevalence: 56.6%; mean concentration: 0.42±0.9 μg/l) was found to have higher AFM1 levels than cow milk (prevalence: 56.0%; mean concentration: 0.19±0.3 μg/l), with statistically significant difference between mean concentrations (P<0.01) and non-significant difference between AFM1 prevalence (P=0.91). Furthermore, milk from commercial dairy farms (prevalence: 64.7%; mean concentration: 0.34±0.65 μg/l) was found to be more contaminated than from household dairy establishments (prevalence: 47.8%; mean concentration: 0.19±0.65 μg/l). The risk factors ‘above average milk yield/day’ (odds ratio (OR): 2.4) and ‘poor animal hygiene’ (OR: 1.9) were identified at animal level, and ‘intensive dairy farming’ (OR: 3.1) and ‘animal feed without aflatoxin binder’ (OR: 4.7) as farm level risk factors for AFM1 excretion above maximum levels of European Union in milk. Among cow breeds, the milk from ‘non-descript’ breed (OR: 11.5) was found to be most contaminated with AFM1 and the least from Jersey breed (OR: 1.0). The present study highlighted the presence of AFM1 in milk samples; therefore, regular monitoring of AFM1 in milk is required so that high risk regions and associated risk factors can be addressed appropriately.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. e0233314
Author(s):  
Basha Chekesa ◽  
Balako Gumi ◽  
Mahlet Chanyalew ◽  
Aboma Zewude ◽  
Gobena Ameni

2011 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 975-982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gift Matope ◽  
Evison Bhebhe ◽  
John Bwalya Muma ◽  
James Oloya ◽  
Rachel L. Madekurozwa ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atinkut Minale Tsega ◽  
Yalelet Worku ◽  
Tewodros Tesfaye ◽  
Shahid Nazir

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 317-324
Author(s):  
Demiso Sima ◽  
Debela Abdeta Ifa ◽  
Akililu Likasa Merga ◽  
Eyob Hirpa Tola

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document