scholarly journals Evaluation of the relationship between the cost and properties of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Flávia Bissoto CALVO ◽  
Ariane KICUTI ◽  
Tamara Kerber TEDESCO ◽  
Mariana Minatel BRAGA ◽  
Daniela Prócida RAGGIO
Keyword(s):  
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Restorative Treatment ◽  
The Cost ◽  
The Relationship

Effect of Mixing Process on Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Cements Used in Atraumatic Restorative Treatment on Primary Molars

2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 251-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda de Morais Ferreira ◽  
Miriam Pimenta Parreira do Vale ◽  
Wellington Corrêa Jansen ◽  
Saul Martins Paiva ◽  
Isabela Almeida Pordeus
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Primary Molars ◽  
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Mixing Process ◽  
Mechanical Mixing ◽  
Restorative Treatment ◽  
Dye Penetration

Aiming to assess the effect of mixing process on microleakage, 40 primary molars were filled with encapsulated glass ionomer cements (GICs) (Vidrion,RCaps and Fuji,IXGPFAST) or with GICs stored in bottles (Vidrion,R and Fuji,IX). Dye penetration was assessed using scores. Encapsulation and mechanical mixing have reduced significantly marginal microleakage levels in class II restorations performed with conventional GICs if compared to the values obtained by their bottled correspondents (p=0,000).

Antibacterial activity of four glass ionomer cements used in atraumatic restorative treatment

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 1859-1862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Cristiane da Silva ◽  
Angela Cristina Cilense Zuanon ◽  
Denise Madalena Palomari Spolidorio ◽  
Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos
Keyword(s):  
Antibacterial Activity ◽  
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Restorative Treatment

scholarly journals Mechanical performance of encapsulated restorative glass-ionomer cements for use with Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART)

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo Fabian MOLINA ◽  
Ricardo Juan CABRAL ◽  
Ignacio MAZZOLA ◽  
Laura BRAIN LASCANO ◽  
Jo. E. FRENCKEN
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Performance ◽  
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Restorative Treatment

scholarly journals Cost and Time Differences between Three Types of Restorations for Primary Teeth: Amalgam, Composite and Glass-Ionomer Cement.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanthao Thi Phan ◽  
John M. Powers ◽  
Franklin Garcia-Godoy ◽  
Timothy Brown ◽  
Lilliam Marie Pinzon
Keyword(s):  
Primary Teeth ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Restorative Treatment ◽  
Costly Treatment ◽  
The Cost

Abstract Background: Early Childhood Caries is the most prevalent chronic disease among children in the United States. Three common approaches for treatment of dental caries in general population include: amalgam, composite, and glass ionomer. The purpose of this study was to measure the treatment cost differences for amalgam, composite, and atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations of primary teeth and evaluate possible factors that could influence the cost of treatment. Methods: This cross-sectional study randomly selected data of 120 restorations from a clinical observational study of the restoration of primary teeth in children aged 5 – 10 years old. The 120 selected restorations in primary teeth, half with two surfaces and half with three surfaces, were performed by two operators at the Asian Health Center and Centro American Resources Center in California. Data were analyzed using multivariable linear regression. Results: Performing ART was found to take 7.8 minutes less than amalgam (p<0.01) and 19.0 minutes less than composite. ART was found to be 6.4% (p=0.01) less costly than amalgam and 62.4% (p<0.01) less costly than composite. Conclusions: ART was found to be the least costly treatment compared to amalgam and composite restoration procedures. ART also required the shortest time during the clinical procedure. Trial Registration: UCSF CHR Number: H55840-32823-02

scholarly journals Tratamiento restaurador atraumático: Eficacia clínica de ionómeros de vidrio en cavidades clase I

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-71
Author(s):  
Katia Medina
Keyword(s):  
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Restorative Treatment ◽  
Para Determinar ◽  
Treatment Trends

La Técnica de Restauración Atraumática (TRA) es un procedimiento preventivo–restauradormínimamente invasivo, como alternativa de tratamiento para poblaciones vulnerables conpoco o nulo acceso a servicios de salud, que consiste en la remoción del tejido dentario cariado utilizando sólo instrumentos manuales y un material adhesivo de restauración: el ionómerode vidrio de alta viscosidad debido a sus propiedades físicas y químicas, como la adhesión ala estructura dental, la biocompatibilidad, la reacción de fraguado químico y el desarrollo yla liberación de fluoruro, que le confieren características preventivas. Objetivo: Revisar laevidencia sobre la eficacia clínica, mediante el desempeño clínico y la supervivencia de losionómeros en el tratamiento restaurador atraumático en dentición decidua. Métodos: Se realizó la búsqueda de información: estudios in vitro, ensayos clínicos aleatorizados y revisionessistemáticas con antigüedad máxima de 10 años, en las bases de datos Medline, Scielo y Scopus, con las estrategias de búsqueda (“Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment/therapeuticuse”[Mesh] OR “Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment/trends”[MesH] OR ART OR PRAT) y((“Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment”[Mesh]) AND (“Glass Ionomer Cements”[Mesh])OR “Ketac-Molar Quick” [Supplementary Concept]). Conclusiones: Existe evidencia científicasuficiente para determinar el éxito de las restauraciones TRA en lesiones de una superficieen dentición decidua, incluso en comparación con los materiales restauradores de los tratamientos convencionales. El desempeño clínico y la supervivencia es alta cuando se utilizan ionómeros de alta viscosidad. Aún no hay consenso acerca de las ventajas del uso de ionómerosde menor costo, encapsulados, reforzados con metal y/o con propiedades mejoradas.

scholarly journals Surface roughness of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment (ART)

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Cristiane da Silva ◽  
Angela Cristina Cilense Zuanon
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy Data ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Restorative Treatment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Microscopy Data

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness of four conventional chemically cured glass ionomer cements (Fuji IX, Ketac Molar, Vidrion R and Vitromolar) commonly used in atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) immediately after material preparation. Twenty specimens of each glass ionomer cement were fabricated and surface roughness was measured after material setting. The specimens were further examined under scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed statistically by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test at 5% significance level. Two-by-two comparisons showed statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between all materials, except for Ketac Molar and Vidrion R, which had statically similar results (p>0.05). Regarding their results of surface roughness, the materials can be presented in a crescent order, as follows: Ketac Molar < Vidrion R < Fuji IX < Vitromolar. In conclusion, from the tested glass ionomer cements, Fuji IX, Ketac Molar and Vidrion R presented acceptable surface roughness after setting reaction while Vitromolar showed remarkably higher surface roughness.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document