scholarly journals Influence of surface treatment on bond strength of resin cements to a nickel alloy

2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-382
Author(s):  
Camilla Bottino da SILVA ◽  
Daniel de Mattos SALIM ◽  
Gabriel Maia KAMMER ◽  
Waldimir CARVALHO ◽  
Cresus Vinicius Depes de GOUVÊA
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Nickel Alloy ◽  
Visual Analysis ◽  
Fracture Pattern ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Bond Failure ◽  
Oxide Particles ◽  
Mixed Fracture ◽  
Microscopy Images

OBJECTIVE: To compare the bond strength of two dual-cure resin cements to Ni-Cr alloy test specimens (TS), with and without surface treatment. METHODS: RelyX ARC and Panavia Fluoro Cements were tested. Eighty nickel alloy TS were cast, measuring 10mmx7mmx2.5mm, forming a total of 40 pairs. Four groups of TS were obtained.Twenty pairs were treated by airborne abrasion with 50µm aluminum oxide particles and 20did not undergo treatment.The TS were cleaned usingultrasound. The parts were cemented according to manufacturers' instructions. A shear bond strength test was performed until bond failure occurred. RESULTS: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed there was a statistical difference (p>0.05) between thegroups. Visual analysis of optical microscopy images showed a mixed fracture pattern with adhesive predominance for RelyX ARC, and mixed with cohesive predominance for Panavia F. The sandblasted groups obtained better bonding, with Panavia F attaining higher bond-strength values than RelyX ARC. CONCLUSION: The Ni-Cr alloy/Panavia F on a treated surface behaved better in terms of bonding.

Bond strength of Y-TZP to resin cements: Surface treatment effects

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. e6
Author(s):  
L.L. Arashiro ◽  
Y.P. Correa ◽  
Q.C. Nguyen ◽  
P.F. Cesar ◽  
S.M. Salazar-Marocho
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Treatment Effects ◽  
Resin Cements

scholarly journals Microtensile bond strength between a UDMA fiber post and different resin cements: Effect of pre-surface treatment

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 923-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renato Cassio ROPERTO ◽  
Thiago Soares PORTO ◽  
Lisa LANG ◽  
Sorin TEICH ◽  
Sean WEBER ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Fiber Post ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Cements

scholarly journals Microshear Bond Strength of Resin Cements to Lithium Disilicate Substrates as a Function of Surface Preparation

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 524-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
DP Lise ◽  
J Perdigão ◽  
A Van Ende ◽  
O Zidan ◽  
GC Lopes
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Lithium Disilicate ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Relyx Unicem ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Microshear Bond Strength ◽  
Silane Solution

SUMMARY Objectives To investigate the effect of hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching, silane solution, and adhesive system application on the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LD) to three resin cements. Materials and Methods Circular bonding areas were delimited on the lithium disilicate surfaces using a perforated adhesive tape. Specimens were assigned to 18 subgroups (n=12) according to surface treatment: NT = no treatment; HF = 4.8% HF for 20 seconds; silane solution: (1) no silane; (2) Monobond Plus, a silane/10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate solution for 60 seconds; (3) Monobond Plus+ExciTE F DSC, a dual-cure adhesive; and resin cement: (1) Variolink II, a bisphenol A diglycidyl ether dimethacrylate (bis-GMA)–based, hand-mixed, dual-cure resin cement; (2) Multilink Automix, a bis-GMA–based, auto-mixed, dual-cure resin cement; (3) RelyX Unicem 2, a self-adhesive, auto-mixed, dual-cure resin cement. Tygon tubes (Ø=0.8 mm) were used as cylinder matrices for resin cement application. After 24 hours of water storage, the specimens were submitted to the μSBS test. Mode of failure was evaluated under an optical microscope and classified as adhesive, mixed, cohesive in resin cement, or cohesive in ceramic. Data were statistically analyzed with three-way analysis of variance and Dunnett test (p<0.05). Results When means were pooled for the factor surface treatment, HF resulted in a significantly higher μSBS than did NT (p<0.0001). Regarding the use of a silane solution, the mean μSBS values obtained with Monobond Plus and Monobond Plus+ExciTE F DSC were not significantly different but were higher than those obtained with no silane (p<0.001). Considering the factor resin cement, Variolink II resulted in a significantly higher mean μSBS than did RelyX Unicem 2 (p<0.03). The mean μSBS for Multilink Automix was not significantly different from those of Variolink II and RelyX Unicem 2. According to Dunnett post hoc test (p<0.05), there was no significant difference in μSBS between the different resin cements for HF-etched and silanized (with or without adhesive application) LD surfaces. Conclusion LD may benefit from pretreatment of the inner surface with HF and silanization, regardless of the resin cement used.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Surface Treatment Methods on the Bond Strength of Zirconia Ceramics Systems, Resin Cements and Tooth Surface

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-112
Author(s):  
Emek Akkuş ◽  
Sebnem Begum Turker
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Silica Coating ◽  
Tooth Surface ◽  
Test Machine ◽  
Ceramic Surface ◽  
Zirconia Ceramics ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Treatment Methods

SUMMARYObjectives: To compare the effects of airborne-particle abrasion (APA) and tribochemical silica coating (TSC) surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength of zirconia ceramics systems, resin cements and tooth surfaceMaterials and Methods: Prefabricated Cercon and ZirkonZahn specimens treated with Al2O3 APA and TSC (Cojet, 3M ESPE) were luted on a dentin surface with Panavia F 2.0 (Kuraray, Japan) and Multilink Automix (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechstein). The specimens were immersed in distilled water (37°C) for 30 days and then loaded in a universal test machine with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Shear bond strength at failure was measured and recorded in N. The data were analysed by Mann-Whitney-U test (p<0.005) and by Chi-square test.Results: It’s demonstrated that the surface treatment affected the bond strength of all specimens. The mean bond strength values of the 2 zirconia systems were nearly the same. Shear bond strength of Cercon specimens treated with Cojet System, luted with Panavia 2.0 (242, 77 ± 53, 17 N were found to be significantly higher (p=0.04) than the other specimens. Fractures were observed at the interface between the ceramic surface and the cements or within the cements.Conclusion: There were no statically significant differences between zirconium systems (Cercon and Zirkonzahn). The specimens luted with Panavia F 2.0 showed higher shear bond strength values than the specimens luted with Multilink Automix. Panavia F 2.0 cement could be used with TSC, when the additive retention was needed.

scholarly journals The effect of surface treatment and thermocycling on the shear bond strength of porcelain laminate veneering material cemented with different luting cements

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. e191581
Author(s):  
Fawaz Alqahtani ◽  
Mohammed Alkhurays
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Hydrofluoric Acid ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Ceramic Surface ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Acid Etch

Aim: The study aimed to evaluate and compare the effect of different surface treatment and thermocycling on the shear bond strength (SBS) of different dual-/light-cure cements bonding porcelain laminate veneers (PLV). Methods: One hundred and twenty A2 shade lithium disilicate discs were divided into three groups based on the resin cement used and on the pretreatment received and then divided into two subgroups: thermocycling and control. The surface treatment were either micro-etched with aluminium trioxide and 10% hydrofluoric acid or etched with 10% hydrofluoric acid only before cementation. Three dual-cure (Variolink Esthetic (I), RelyX Ultimate (II), and RelyX Unicem (III)) and three light-cure (Variolink Veneer (IV), Variolink Esthetic (V), RelyX Veneer (VI)) resin cements were used for cementation. The SBS of the samples was evaluated and analysed using three -way ANOVA with statistical significant set at α=0.05. Results: For all resin cements tested with different surface treatments, there was a statistically significant difference within resin cements per surface treatment (p<0.05). The shear bond strength in the micro-etch group was significant higher than the acid-etch group (p<0.05) There was statistically significant interaction observed between the surface treatment and thermocycling (p<0.05) as well as the cement and thermocycling(p<0.05). It was observed that the reduction in shear bond strength after thermocycling was more pronounced in the acid etch subgroup as compared to the microetch subgroup. However, the interaction between the three factors: surface treatments, thermocycling and resin cements did not demonstrate statistically significant differences between and within groups (p=0.087). Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present study, it acan be concluded that Dual cure resin cements showed a higher Shear bond strength as compared to light cure resin cements. Thermal cycling significantly decreased the shear bond strength for both ceramic surface treatments. After thermocycling, the specimens with 10% HF surface treatment showed lower shear bond strength values when compared to those treated by sandblasting with Al2O3 particles.

scholarly journals Effect of Glass Fiber Post Surface Treatment on Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Resin Cement: An “In Vitro” Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Lairds Rodrigues dos Santos ◽  
Darlon Martins Lima ◽  
Edilausson Moreno Carvalho ◽  
Vandilson Pinheiro Rodrigues ◽  
Claudia Maria Coelho Alves
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Peroxide ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Aluminum Oxide ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Glass Fiber ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Adhesive Failure ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Oxide Particles ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement

Objective. This study evaluated the influence of different mechanical and chemical surface treatments alone and combined with silane on the bond strength (BS) of glass fiber posts (GFPs) using self-adhesive resin cement. Methods. Eighty-four single-rooted bovine teeth (six groups, n = 14) were submitted to BS analysis after GFP cementation. The treatments applied in the studied groups were no surface treatment (control), silane (S), 24% hydrogen peroxide (PER), 24% hydrogen peroxide and silane (PER + SIL), blasting with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles (BLAST), and blasting with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles and silane (BLAST + SIL). Results. BS differed significantly among groups ( p  < 0.001). It was higher in the SIL (10.5 ± 3.5 MPa), BLAST + SIL (11.5 ± 3.2 MPa), and PER + SIL (11.6 ± 4.6 MPa) groups than in the control (6.5 ± 2.9 MPa), BLAST (8.6 ± 4.0 MPa), and PER (7.1 ± 2.8 MPa) groups, with no significant difference among groups receiving silanization. Cement post adhesive failure was more common in the SIL, BLAST, and PER + SIL groups, and cement-dentin adhesive failure was more common in the control, BLAST + SIL, and PER groups. Conclusion. These results show that silane application alone increases BS.

scholarly journals Influence of Surface Treatment and Resin Cements on the Bond Strength between the Y-TZP Zirconia and Composite Resin Interface

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 477-482
Author(s):  
Lucas Campagnaro Maciel ◽  
Amanda Pádua Proeza ◽  
Hélyda Coelho Guimarães Balbino ◽  
Marcela Moráo Corteletti ◽  
Ricardo Huver De Jesus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
The Self ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement

AbstractThe evolution of dental materials and the improvement of ceramic systems stimulated the increased use of Y-TZP zirconia-based ceramics. Despite the excellent mechanical performance, this material has low adhesion potential. The objective of this work was to evaluate the surface treatments and resin cements influence on bond strength between Y-TZP zirconia and composite resin interface. A total of 60 blocks of Y-TZP zirconia (3x8x8mm) were prepared and divided into 3 groups according to the surface treatments: (C) control - extra fine diamond bur, (J) sandblasting with Al2O3 and (JP) sandblasting with Al2O3 + ceramic primer. Each group was subdivided into two groups according to type of resin cement used for cementing composite resin discs (2mm thick x 5mm diameter): self-adhesive and conventional (n=10). The samples were stored in distilled water for 24 hours at 37±1°C in a incubator and subsequently submitted to the shear bond test to determine the bond strength (RU). There was no significant difference in RU among the  surface treatments when using conventional resin cement. For the self-adhesive resin cement, Al2O3 blasting and Al2O3 + primer blasting increased the RU but did not present significant differences between them (p<0.05). Comparing the cements, it was observed that regardless of the surface treatment, the highest values were for the self-adhesive resin cement (p<0.05). Application of the primer after blasting with Al2O3 did not increase RU. Keywords: Dental Prosthesis. Ceramics. Dental cements. Shear Strength.  ResumoA evolução dos materiais odontológicos e o aprimoramento dos sistemas cerâmicos impulsionaram o aumento da utilização da cerâmica a base de zircônia Y-TZP. Apesar do excelente desempenho mecânico, este material apresenta baixo potencial de adesão. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a influência dos tratamentos de superfícies e dos cimentos resinosos na resistência de união entre a interface zircônia Y-TZP e resina composta. Foram confeccionados 60 blocos de zircônia Y-TZP (3x8x8 mm) e divididos em 03 grupos de acordo com os tratamentos de superfícies que receberam: (C) controle - ponta diamantada extrafina, (J) jateamento com Al2O3 e (JP) jateamento com Al2O3 + primer cerâmico. Cada grupo foi subdividido em dois novos grupos de acordo com tipo de cimento resinoso utilizado para cimentação de discos de resina composta (2mm de espessura x 5mm de diâmetro): autoadesivo e resinoso convencional (n=10). As amostras foram armazenadas em água destilada por 24 horas a 37±1°C em estufa e posteriormente submetidas ao teste de cisalhamento para averiguar a resistência de união (RU). Não houve diferença significativa na RU entre os tratamentos de superfície quando utilizado o cimento resinoso convencional. Para o cimento resinoso autoadesivo o jateamento com Al2O3 e o jateamento de Al2O3 + primer aumentaram a RU porém não apresentaram diferenças significativas entre si (p<0,05). Comparando os cimentos observou-se que, independente do tratamento de superfície, os maiores valores foram para o cimento resinoso autoadesivo (p<0,05). A aplicação do primer após o jateamento com Al2O3 não proporcionou aumento da RU. Palavras-chave: Prótese Dentária. Cerâmica. Cimentos Dentários. Resistência ao Cisalhamento.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document