scholarly journals Class II Division 2 subdivision left malocclusion associated with anterior deep overbite in an adult patient with temporomandibular disorder

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 102-112
Author(s):  
Ivan Toshio Maruo
Keyword(s):  
Adult Patient ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorder ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Chief Complaint ◽  
Poor Correlation ◽  
Present Case Report ◽  
Angle Class Ii ◽  
The Poor ◽  
Dentofacial Orthopedics ◽  
Division 2

ABSTRACT The orthodontic treatment of patients with chief complaint of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) presents doubtful prognosis, due to the poor correlation between malocclusions and TMDs. The present case report describes the treatment of an adult patient with Angle Class II Division 2 subdivision left malocclusion associated with anterior deep overbite and TMD. This case was presented to the Brazilian Board of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (BBO), as part of the requirements to obtain the title of BBO Diplomate.

scholarly journals Treatment of a Class II Division 2 malocclusion with Cover Bite and Severe Crowding in an Adult patient

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 29-31
Author(s):  
Nabila Anwar ◽  
Gazi Shamim Hassan ◽  
Ranjit Ghosh ◽  
Mahmood Shajedeen
Keyword(s):  
Adult Patient ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Deep Bite ◽  
Fixed Appliance ◽  
Angle Class Ii ◽  
Maxillary Lateral Incisor ◽  
Division 2 ◽  
Lower Incisors

This case report describes the orthodontic treatment of an adult patient, who presented an Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion, with deep traumatic overbite, retroclined incisors with proclined left  maxillary lateral incisor and mild gingival recessions. Treatment of an adult Class II patient requires careful diagnosis and a treatment plan involving esthetic, occlusal, and functional considerations. The patient was treated with extraction of four first premolars to relieve crowding, with simultaneous correction of the deep bite by intrusion of the upper and/or lower incisors using fixed appliance mechanotherapy.Ban J Orthod & Dentofac Orthop, April 2013; Vol-3, No.2

scholarly journals Angle Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion and Association with Late Eruption

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Beatriz Aguiar do Amaral ◽  
Heitel Cabral Filho ◽  
João Paulo da Silva-Neto ◽  
Maria da Glória Almeida Martins ◽  
Kenio Costa de Lima
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Angle Class Ii ◽  
Angle Class ◽  
Division 2

scholarly journals Agenesis of maxillary lateral incisor in an Angle Class II, Division 1 malocclusion patient

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 108-117
Author(s):  
Guilherme Thiesen
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Lateral Incisor ◽  
Occlusal Plane ◽  
Angle Class Ii ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Angle Class ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Maxillary Lateral Incisor ◽  
Dentofacial Orthopedics ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

The present case report describes the orthodontic treatment of a patient with agenesis of maxillary left lateral incisor and Angle Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. The patient also presented with maxillary midline deviation and inclination of the occlusal plane in the anterior region. Treatment objectives were: correction of sagittal relationship between the maxilla and the mandible; correction of midline deviation, so as to cause maxillary and mandibular midlines to coincide; correction of overbite and leveling of the occlusal plane, so as to create ideal conditions for esthetic rehabilitation of anterior teeth. This case was presented to the Brazilian Board of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (BBO) as a requirement for the title of certified by the BBO.

Prevalence and patterns of tooth agenesis in Angle class II division 2 malocclusion in Italy: A case-control study

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 538-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto De Stefani ◽  
Giovanni Bruno ◽  
Edoardo Conte ◽  
Alessandro Frezza ◽  
Paolo Balasso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Control Study ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Tooth Agenesis ◽  
Angle Class Ii ◽  
Angle Class ◽  
Division 2 ◽  
Control Study

Mandibular displacement in Angle Class II, Division 2 malocclusion

1992 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 509-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Demisch ◽  
Bengt Ingervall ◽  
Urs Thüer
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Angle Class Ii ◽  
Angle Class ◽  
Division 2

Angle's Classification of Malocclusion: An Assessment of Reliability

1974 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 79-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Gravely ◽  
D. B. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Angle Class Ii ◽  
Angle Class ◽  
Division 2 ◽  
Made In

The reliability of Angle's system of classification of malocclusion has been examined. Between-examiner errors were found to be high and there were also high within-examiner error levels in categorizing Angle Class II division 2 malocclusions. It is concluded that comparisons of the distribution of malocclusions in different communities, classified according to Angle's system, should not be made unless observations are made in each community by the same examiner. The usefulness of Angle's classification to both clinician and epidemiologist is questioned.

scholarly journals On the Interaction between Incisor Crown-Root Morphology and Third-Order Angulation

2009 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 454-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Knösel ◽  
Klaus Jung ◽  
Thomas Attin ◽  
Wilfried Engelke ◽  
Dietmar Kubein-Meesenburg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Null Hypothesis ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Third Order ◽  
Crown Root ◽  
Angle Class Ii ◽  
Angle Class ◽  
Group A ◽  
Incisor Inclination ◽  
Division 2

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the significance of crown-root angles (CRAs) by testing the null hypothesis that there are no significant differences in deviations of third-order angles to axial inclination values between Angle Class II division 2 incisors and a neutral occlusion control sample. Materials and Methods: The study group comprised ntotal = 130 whites with either Angle Class II division 2 (n1 = 62; group A) or neutral (n2 = 68; control group B) occlusal relationships. Upper central incisor inclination (U1) was assessed with reference to the cephalometric lines NA and palatal plane (U1NA/deg, U1PP/deg). Craniofacial sagittal and vertical relations were classified using angles SNA, SNB, ANB, and NSL-PP. Third-order angles were derived from corresponding dental cast pairs using an incisor inclination gauge. Welch's two-sample t-tests (α-level: .05) were used to test the null hypothesis. Single linear regression was applied to determine third-order angle values as a function of axial inclination values (U1NA, U1PP) or sagittal craniofacial structures (ANB angle), separately for group A and B. Results: The discrepancy between axial inclination (U1NA, U1PP) and third-order angles is significantly different (P < .001) between groups A and B. Regression analysis revealed a simply moderate correlation between third-order measurements and axial inclinations or sagittal craniofacial structures. Conclusion: The hypothesis is rejected. The results of this study warn against the use of identical third-order angles irrespective of diminished CRAs typical for Angle Class II division 2 subjects. Routine CRA assessment may be considered in orthodontic treatment planning of Angle Class II division 2 cases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document