scholarly journals Combining ability analysis for grain filling duration and yield traits in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.)

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 411-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamaluddin ◽  
Rishi M. Singh ◽  
Lal C. Prasad ◽  
Malik Z. Abdin ◽  
Arun K. Joshi
1994 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 681-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. D. Duguid ◽  
A. L. Brûlé-Babel

Final grain dry weight, a component of yield in spring wheat, is determined by the rate and duration of grain filling. The objective of this study was to compare grain dry weight and rate and duration of grain filling amongst five spring wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.) that differed in time to maturity. Glenlea, Katepwa, PT516, Roblin, and Wildcat were sown in replicated trials on four seeding dates in 1988 and 1989 at Winnipeg, Manitoba. Mean grain dry weight was measured at various intervals from anthesis to maturity. A logistic equation was used to characterize grain filling and estimate final grain dry weight, and the duration and maximum rate of grain filling. Stepwise multivariate analysis indicated that final grain dry weight was the most important variable characterizing the grain filling curves, followed by duration and then maximum rate of grain filling. The highest grain dry weights were produced by Glenlea (40.4 mg) and Wildcat (36.9 mg). Roblin (34.9 mg) was intermediate in grain dry weight while Katepwa (32.4 mg) and PT516 (30.3 mg) produced the smallest grains. Genotypes with the highest grain dry weights had shorter durations and higher maximum rates of grain filling. Key words:Triticum aestivum L., grain filling, duration, rate, phenological development, yield


2007 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 504-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamaluddin ◽  
Rishi Muni Singh ◽  
Malik Zainul Abdin ◽  
Mather Ali Khan ◽  
Tanweer Alam ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Pararajasingham ◽  
L. A. Hunt

Estimates of the base temperature for grain filling duration of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) differ between outdoor and indoor studies. This study was set up to determine whether this difference could be attributed to variation in spike-air temperature differentials. Spike and/or spikelet temperatures were determined in wheat grown outdoors as well as indoors. Spike temperature, measured with an infrared thermometer, of wheat grown outdoors with adequate water supply was 1.5 °C greater than air temperature while spikelet temperature measured with a thermocouple closely approximated air temperature. In indoor grown wheat, on the other hand, regardless of the magnitude of air temperature, spikelet temperature was found to be 3–4 °C above that of air when lights were on. Estimating the base temperature for grain filling duration with data from a previous indoor study, with compensation for the 3–4 °C increase in spikelet temperature, resulted in 8.8 °C base temperature for grain filling duration, comparable to that obtained in outdoor studies. Differences between outdoor and indoor studies may thus reflect spike-air temperature differentials. Estimation of the base temperature for grain filling with air temperature appears appropriate for outdoor studies. Key words: Triticum aestivum (L.), base temperature, grain filling duration, wheat


2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (03) ◽  
pp. 577-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Saeed ◽  
Iftikhar Hussain Khalil ◽  
Durr-e- Nayab ◽  
Shakeel Ahmad Anjum ◽  
Mohsin Tanveer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document