scholarly journals Cost effectiveness of chemohormonal therapy in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive and non-metastatic high-risk prostate cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Nazareth Aguiar Jr. ◽  
Carmélia Maria Noia Barreto ◽  
Bárbara de Souza Gutierres ◽  
Hakaru Tadokoro ◽  
Gilberto de Lima Lopes Jr
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Incremental Cost ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Chemohormonal Therapy ◽  
High Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Hormone Sensitive ◽  
The Cost

ABSTRACT Objective To assess the cost-effectiveness of chemohormonal therapy in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive and non-metastatic high-risk prostate cancer. Methods An analytical decision model was developed to determine the cost-effectiveness of chemohormonal therapy versus androgen deprivation therapy alone in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and patients with non-metastatic high-risk prostate cancer. The cost-effectiveness in metastatic patients with a high-volume disease was assessed separately. The model used data from randomized clinical trials and drug acquisition costs in Brazil. In addition, the costs of post-progression therapies have been included in this model. The benefits to health are expressed as the quality-adjusted life-years, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated. Results Chemohormonal therapy may be associated with improved quality-adjusted life-years for all patient. The improvement was more than six times greater for patients with high-volume metastatic disease. In these patients, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were up to 74% lower than the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of patients with non-metastatic disease. Conclusion Chemohormonal therapy has been more cost-effective in patients with high-volume metastatic disease.

scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness of docetaxel in high-volume hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaclyn Beca ◽  
Habeeb Majeed ◽  
Kelvin K.W. Chan ◽  
Sebastian J. Hotte ◽  
Andrew Loblaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Hormone Sensitive ◽  
The Cost

Introduction: Three pivotal trials have considered the addition of docetaxel (D) chemotherapy to conventional androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) for the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC). While an initial small trial was inconclusive, two larger trials demonstrated significant clinical benefit, including pronounced survival benefits (added 17 months) among patients with high-volume metastatic disease. Given the evolving clinical evidence, the cost-effectiveness of this approach warrants exploration. Methods: The cost-effectiveness of six cycles of ADT+D compared to ADT alone to treat patients with high-volume metastatic HSPC was assessed from a Canadian public payer perspective. We included three health states: HSPC, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and death. Survival data were obtained from the CHAARTED trial, which reported outcomes specifically for high-volume disease. We used Ontario costs data and utilities from the literature. Results: In the base case analysis, ADT+D cost an additional $25 757 and produced an extra 1.06 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $24 226/QALY gained. Results from one-way sensitivity analysis across wide ranges of estimates and a range of scenarios, including an alternate model structure, produced ICERs below $35 000/QALY gained in all cases. Conclusions: The use of D with ADT in high-volume metastatic HSPC appears to be an economically attractive treatment approach. The findings were consistent with other studies and robust in sensitivity analysis across a variety of scenarios.

Long-term oncologic outcomes of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localized, high-risk prostate cancer.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 153-153
Author(s):  
Jonathan L Silberstein ◽  
Stephen A Poon ◽  
Daniel Sjoberg ◽  
Andrew J. Vickers ◽  
Aaron Bernie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Chemohormonal Therapy ◽  
High Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer

153 Background: To determine long-term oncologic outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) after neoadjuvant chemo-hormonal therapy for clinically localized, high-risk prostate cancer. Methods: In this phase II multicenter trial of patients with high-risk prostate cancer (prostate-specific antigen greater than 20ng/ml, Gleason greater than or equal to 8, or clinical stage greater than or equal to T3), androgen deprivation therapy (goserelin acetate depot) and paclitaxel, carboplatin and estramustine were administered prior to RP. We report the long-term oncologic outcomes of these patients and compared them to a contemporary cohort who met oncologic inclusion criteria but received RP only. Results: Thirty four patients were enrolled in this study and followed for a median of 13.1 years. Within 10 years most patients experienced biochemical recurrence (BCR-free probability= 22%; 95% CI 10%, 37%). However the probability of disease-specific survival at 10 years was 84% (95% CI 66%, 93%) and overall survival was 78% (95% CI 60%, 89%). The chemohormonal therapy group had higher-risk features than the comparison group (N=123 patients) with an almost doubled risk of calculated preoperative 5-year BCR (69% vs 36%, p<0.0001). After adjusting for these imbalances the CHT group had trends toward improvement in BCR (0.76, 95% CI 0.43, 1.34; p=0.3) and metastasis free survival (0.55, 95% CI 0.24, 1.29; p=.2) although these were not significant. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by RP was associated with lower observed rates of BCR and metastasis compared to a prostatectomy only group; however these results were not significant. Because this treatment strategy has known harms and unproven benefit, this strategy should only be instituted in the setting of a clinical trial.

scholarly journals Pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy of high risk prostate cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 80-89
Author(s):  
M. V. Berkut ◽  
A. S. Artemjeva ◽  
S. S. Tolmachev ◽  
S. A. Reva ◽  
S. V. Petrov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Pathologic Response ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Chemohormonal Therapy ◽  
High Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Group B

Background. The role of pathological response, which develops as a result of systemic therapy for localized and locally advanced high risk prostate cancer, is not still fully understood. There are no clear indications for neoadjuvant therapy and no data on the relationship between neoadjuvant therapy and median of overall or progression free survival. According to increasing interest for neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by radical prostatectomy, we evaluated the features of pathological response and its effects on overall and progression free survival rates.Objective. Estimating residual disease and pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy of high risk prostate cancer and its relationship with oncological results.Materials and methods. This was a prospective randomized study: patients with prostate cancer of high and very high-risk groups (prostate specific antigen levels >20 ng/ml and/or Gleason score ≥8 and/or clinical stage ≥T2c) were treated with neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by radical prostatectomy (n = 36). The neoadjuvant course included the intravenous administration of docetaxel once every 21 days (75 mg/m2 up to 6 cycles) and the antagonist of the gonadotropin releasing hormone degarelix according to the standard scheme (6subcutaneous injections every 28 days). The prostate tissue was evaluated for the residual disease, features of pathological response according to the ABC system. Additionally, the expression of IHC markers (p53, bcl-2, p16, Ki-67, androgen receptors, c-MYC, ERG, PTEN) was evaluated on postoperative material using tissue microarray.Results. A totally of 480 H&Epostoperative and 775 H&E biopsy slides were analyzed. Group A included 10 (32.3 %) cases, group B — 16 (51.6 %), and group C — 5 (16.1 %). The variance analysis revealed a significant difference in the frequency of more localized forms of prostate cancer in group B (43.7 %) (p = 0.028). During assessment we did not found any relationship ABC system assignment and preoperative prostate specific antigen level, the presence of a positive surgical margin, the pathological stage of diseases or regional lymph nodes involvement. However, the values of relapse-free survival vary sharply between groups: the highest median of relapse-free survival was found in group B — 23.02 ± 12.61 months, patients of groups A/C could not achieve the level of median relapse-free survival — 11.7 ± 6.43 and 16.19 ± 16.54 months respectively.Conclusion. The effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy for high risk prostate cancer can be assessed by the features of pathologic response through ABC system which has demonstrated own versatility and reproducibility in presented material. Neoadjuvant therapy with docetaxel and degarelix can improve the treatment outcomes of prostate cancer patients at high and very high risk of disease progression. The data on changes in the prostate tissue can be helpful in predicting the duration of the effect after chemohormonal therapy with subsequent surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document