Abnormal Maxillary Trapezoid Pattern in Human Fetal Cleft Lip and Palate

2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soung Min Kim ◽  
Young Joon Lee ◽  
Sang Shin Lee ◽  
Yeon Sook Kim ◽  
Suk Keun Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Nasal Septum ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Growth Patterns ◽  
Radiographic Images ◽  
Alveolar Cleft ◽  
Abnormal Growth ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Different Types

Objective: To elucidate abnormal growth patterns of human fetal maxillae with cleft lip and palate (CLP). Subject: A total of 71 fetal maxillae with CLP were obtained from aborted human fetuses. Method: Dimensions of the maxillary trapezoid (MT), formed by the maxillary primary growth centers (MxPGC), were taken from radiographic images. The CLP dimensions were compared with maxillary trapezoid dimensions of normal fetuses from a previous study (Lee et al., 1992). Main Outcome Measures: Cleft lip subjects without a cleft palate, unilateral cleft lip-alveolar cleft or cleft palate (UCL+A/UCLP), and bilateral cleft lip-alveolar cleft or cleft palate (BCL+A/BCLP) displayed abnormal MT patterns. MT abnormalities were most marked in the BCL+A/BCLP cohort. Results: The MT growth of prenatal CLP maxillae was severely arrested, resulting in abnormal MT shape on palatal radiograms. BCL+A/BCLP subjects had a more protruded nasal septum than subjects with other types of CLPs, while UCL+A/UCLP subjects showed severe deviation of the protruded nasal septum toward the noncleft side. Cleft lip-only subjects also exhibited abnormal MT growth. Conclusion: MT is primarily involved in CLPs, so that the MT shape could be utilized as a sensitive indicator for the analysis of maxillary malformation in different types of CLPs.

scholarly journals Speech in a consecutive series of children born with cleft lip and palate with and without syndromes and/or additional malformations

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Klintö ◽  
Maria Sporre ◽  
Magnus Becker
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Total Group ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Audio Recordings ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Palatal Surgery ◽  
Group Comparisons

Abstract Background When evaluating speech in children with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP/L), children with known syndromes and/or additional malformations (CP/L+) are usually excluded. The aim of this study was to present speech outcome of a consecutive series of 5-year-olds born with CP/L, and to compare speech results of children with CP/L + and children with CP/L without known syndromes and/or additional malformations (CP/L-). Methods One hundred 5-year-olds (20 with CP/L+; 80 with CP/L-) participated. All children were treated with primary palatal surgery in one stage with the same procedure for muscle reconstruction. Three independent judges performed phonetic transcriptions and rated perceived velopharyngeal competence from audio recordings. Based on phonetic transcriptions, percent consonants correct (PCC) and percent non-oral errors were investigated. Group comparisons were performed. Results In the total group, mean PCC was 88.2 and mean percent non-oral errors 1.5. The group with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) had poorer results on both measures compared to groups with other cleft types. The average results of PCC and percent non-oral errors in the CP/L + group indicated somewhat poorer speech, but no significant differences were observed. In the CP/L + group, 25 % were judged as having incompetent velopharyngeal competence, compared to 15 % in the CP/L- group. Conclusions The results indicated relatively good speech compared to speech of children with CP/L in previous studies. Speech was poorer in many children with more extensive clefts. No significant differences in speech outcomes were observed between CP/L + and CP/L- groups.

Results of Multidisciplinary Management of Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate at the Iowa Cleft Palate Center

1992 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 419-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janusz Bardach ◽  
Hughlett L. Morris ◽  
William H. Olin ◽  
Steven D. Gray ◽  
David L. Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Multidisciplinary Management ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip

Phonological Profile of Patients With Velopharyngeal Dysfunction and Palatal Anomalies

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Ariela Nachmani ◽  
Muhamed Masalha ◽  
Firas Kassem
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Phonological Process ◽  
Phonological Processes ◽  
Process Error ◽  
Submucous Cleft Palate ◽  
Different Types

Purpose This purpose of this study was to assess the frequency and types of phonological process errors in patients with velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) and the different types of palatal anomalies. Method A total of 808 nonsyndromic patients with VPD, who underwent follow-up at the Center for Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies, from 2000 to 2016 were included. Patients were stratified into four age groups and five subphenotypes of palatal anomalies: cleft lip and palate (CLP), cleft palate (CP), submucous cleft palate (SMCP), occult submucous cleft palate (OSMCP), and non-CP. Phonological processes were compared among groups. Results The 808 patients ranged in age from 3 to 29 years, and 439 (54.3%) were male. Overall, 262/808 patients (32.4%) had phonological process errors; 80 (59.7%) ages 3–4 years, 98 (40, 0%) ages 4.1–6 years, 48 (24.7%) 6.1–9 years, and 36 (15.3%) 9.1–29 years. Devoicing was the most prevalent phonological process error, found in 97 patients (12%), followed by cluster reduction in 82 (10.1%), fronting in 66 (8.2%), stopping in 45 (5.6%), final consonant deletion in 43 (5.3%), backing in 30 (3.7%), and syllable deletion and onset deletion in 13 (1.6%) patients. No differences were found in devoicing errors between palatal anomalies, even with increasing age. Phonological processes were found in 61/138 (44.20%) with CP, 46/118 (38.1%) with SMCP, 61/188 (32.4%) with non-CP, 70/268 (26.1%) with OSMCP, and 25/96 (26.2%) with CLP. Phonological process errors were most frequent with CP and least with OSMCP ( p = .001). Conclusions Phonological process errors in nonsyndromic VPD patients remained relatively high in all age groups up to adulthood, regardless of the type of palatal anomaly. Our findings regarding the phonological skills of patients with palatal anomalies can help clarify the etiology of speech and sound disorders in VPD patients, and contribute to general phonetic and phonological studies.

Maxillary Lateral Incisors of Subjects with Cleft Lip and/or Palate: Part 2

1992 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 380-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Suzuki ◽  
Mieko Watanabe ◽  
Masayuki Nakano ◽  
Yasuhide Takahama
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Primary Teeth ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Permanent Teeth ◽  
Intermediate Type ◽  
Alveolar Cleft ◽  
Distal Side ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Dental Hospital ◽  
Primary Lateral

Maxillary lateral incisors on the alveolar cleft were investigated in 431 cleft children registered in the Department of Orthodontics, Kyushu University Dental Hospital. The majority of primary maxillary lateral incisors were located on the distal side of the alveolar cleft in both unilateral cleft lip and alveolus (UCLA) and unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) subjects. Permanent teeth in UCLA tend to be located distally, but in UCLP they tend to be congenially absent (p < .01). The majority of primary teeth had normal shapes; the majority of permanent teeth were of intermediate type or were missing congenially. One third of the UCLA and one half of the UCLP subjects who had primary maxillary lateral incisors were not followed by permanent replacements. The location of the majority of permanent maxillary lateral incisors tallied with that of the primary ones except in four UCLA, ten UCLP, and two bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) subjects. Four UCLA and ten UCLP subjects who had primary lateral incisors on the distal side were followed by their permanent successors on the mesial side. Three UCLP and one BCLP subjects had permanent maxillary lateral incisors even though they had no temporary predecessors.

scholarly journals Incidence of Bilateral Cleft Lip And Palate In A University Hospital Setting-A Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (SPL3) ◽  
pp. 363-367
Author(s):  
Monisha K ◽  
Senthil Murugan P ◽  
Aravind Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Neck Region ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
One Year

Cleft lip and palate (CLP) is one of the most prevalent malformations occurring in the head and neck region. Cleft lip and palate is the second most birth defect in the US after club foot. The incidence of Cleft lip and cleft palate is also very common in Indian Population with the rate of 1 in 700 births approximately. In India, the main reason for the formation of Cleft Lip and cleft palate is consanguineous marriage due to less awareness among people. Cleft lip can be unilateral or bilateral and may involve or palate. Again it can be further classified as Complete or Incomplete cleft lip and /or Cleft palate. Most of the patients were deprived of treatment, mainly due to their unawareness and their lower status. Cleft patients need comprehensive, cleft care management. So the aim of this study is to find the incidence of bilateral cleft lip or palate in patients who reported toSaveetha Dental College and Hospital, Chennai. This study is done with 76 patients40 males, 36 females)who visited a Saveetha Dental College during one year between June 2019-April 2020. All available data were extracted from patients case sheets and results were obtained through SPSS analysis. In this study, we observed that 90.5 % of patients reported with unilateral cleft lip and palate, where only 9.1% of patients reported with bilateral cases. Males were having high prevalence with 52.6 % and females 47.4%. conclusion, male patients had higher cleft lip and palate compared to females. The incidence of bilateral cases seen among cleft lip and palate is fewer in males.

scholarly journals Case report on bilateral cleft palate with protuded premaxilla

2022 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 154-157
Author(s):  
Priyanka Kosare ◽  
Pallavi Madanrao Bobade
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Soft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Icd 10

Cleft palate (ICD 10-Q 35.9) with Protruding of premaxilla is common feature in patient with bilateral cleft lip and palate it is due to the under trained growth at anterior nasal septal and vomero-premaxillary suture without lateral continuities. Hippocrates (400BC) AND Galen(150AD) mansion cleft lip, but not cleft palate in their writing, Cleft palate –Fanco.(1556), Repair of cleft lip –as early as 255-206 BC in CHINA. The first successful closure of a soft palate defect was reported in 1764 by LEMONNIERa French dentist.

Cleft Lip and Palate in Tehran

1992 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abbas A.Y. Taher
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Sulfur Mustard ◽  
Mustard Gas ◽  
Live Births ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip

Seventy-nine cleft lip and/or palate births were isolated from 21,138 live births between January 1, 1983 and December 31, 1988 in one hospital in Tehran. Among these, 21 (26.58 percent) were cleft lip (CL), 45 (56.96 percent) were cleft lip and palate (CLP), and 13 (16.45 percent) were cleft palate (CP). Chemical sulfur mustard gas was indicated as a major factor in 30 (37.97 percent) of the bilateral cleft lip and palate infants.

Comparison of Velopharyngeal Growth Patterns between Cleft Lip and/or Palate Patients Requiring or Not Requiring Pharyngeal Flap Surgery

1994 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 452-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Mazaheri ◽  
Athanasios E. Athanasiou ◽  
Ross E. Long
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Soft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Growth Curves ◽  
Growth Patterns ◽  
Flap Surgery ◽  
Velopharyngeal Incompetence ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Pharyngeal Flap

This investigation compares the patterns of velopharyngeal growth in cleft lip and/or palate patients. Those who had velopharyngeal competence and acceptable speech are compared with those who presented with velopharyngeal incompetence requiring pharyngeal flap surgery or prosthesis later. Lateral cephalograms of 30 cleft palate only (CPO), 35 unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), and 20 bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) children of the Lancaster Cleft Palate Clinic were studied. These records were taken at 6 month intervals during the first 2 postnatal years and annually thereafter up to 6 years of age. Soft tissue landmark points in the velopharyngeal region were digitized. Length and thickness of the soft palate and height and depth of the nasopharynx were measured. Evaluation of the growth curves of these four cephalometric variables indicated only two significant differences between children who later required pharyngeal flap surgery and those who did not. These differences were found in the growth in length of the soft palate of the CPO group and in the growth in depth of the nasopharynx of the BCLP group. Based on the present cephalometric data, it is Impossible to predict at an early age those cleft lip and/or palate patients who will later require pharyngeal flaps.

Palatal Changes after Lip Surgery in Different Types of Cleft Lip and Palate

1994 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 376-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gem J.C. Kramer ◽  
Jan B. Hoeksma ◽  
Birte Prahl-Andersen
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Region ◽  
Alveolar Cleft ◽  
Nasal Side ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Palatal Development ◽  
Depth Reduction

This study concerns palatal development during 6 months following primary lip closure. The sample consisted of 75 children with different forms of cleft lip and palate and 51 noneleft children. The palate was measured at 3 months of age, just before lip surgery, after surgery at 6 months, and again at 9 months of age. The results showed that lip closure has a strong effect in the anterior alveolar region. This effect was restricted to 3 months after surgery. The changes in complete clefts were more explicit than in incomplete cleft forms. Furthermore, the data showed that arch depth reduction due to lip surgery was compensated for by continued anteroposterior palatal growth. Early orthopedics appeared to prevent major palatal collapse immediately after lip surgery. Finally simultaneous closure of the alveolar cleft at the nasal side resulted in continued reduction of anterior cleft width.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document