scholarly journals Probabilistic Description Logics for Subjective Uncertainty

2017 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. 1-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Gutierrez-Basulto ◽  
Jean Christoph Jung ◽  
Carsten Lutz ◽  
Lutz Schröder
Keyword(s):  
Description Logics ◽  
Order Logic ◽  
First Order Logic ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Subjective Probabilities ◽  
Subjective Uncertainty ◽  
First Order ◽  
New Family ◽  
Probabilistic Description

We propose a family of probabilistic description logics (DLs) that are derived in a principled way from Halpern's probabilistic first-order logic. The resulting probabilistic DLs have a two-dimensional semantics similar to temporal DLs and are well-suited for representing subjective probabilities. We carry out a detailed study of reasoning in the new family of logics, concentrating on probabilistic extensions of the DLs ALC and EL, and showing that the complexity ranges from PTime via ExpTime and 2ExpTime to undecidable.

Logics for the Semantic Web

2011 ◽  
pp. 24-43
Author(s):  
J. Bruijn
Keyword(s):  
Semantic Web ◽  
Logic Programming ◽  
Description Logic ◽  
Description Logics ◽  
Order Logic ◽  
First Order Logic ◽  
Horn Logic ◽  
First Order ◽  
Logical Language ◽  
Rule Languages

This chapter introduces a number of formal logical languages which form the backbone of the Semantic Web. They are used for the representation of both ontologies and rules. The basis for all languages presented in this chapter is the classical first-order logic. Description logics is a family of languages which represent subsets of first-order logic. Expressive description logic languages form the basis for popular ontology languages on the Semantic Web. Logic programming is based on a subset of first-order logic, namely Horn logic, but uses a slightly different semantics and can be extended with non-monotonic negation. Many Semantic Web reasoners are based on logic programming principles and rule languages for the Semantic Web based on logic programming are an ongoing discussion. Frame Logic allows object-oriented style (frame-based) modeling in a logical language. RuleML is an XML-based syntax consisting of different sublanguages for the exchange of specifications in different logical languages over the Web.

scholarly journals SOME MODEL THEORY OF GUARDED NEGATION

2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (04) ◽  
pp. 1307-1344
Author(s):  
VINCE BÁRÁNY ◽  
MICHAEL BENEDIKT ◽  
BALDER TEN CATE
Keyword(s):  
Modal Logic ◽  
Model Theory ◽  
Description Logics ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Order Logic ◽  
First Order Logic ◽  
First Order ◽  
Beth Definability ◽  
Order Translations ◽  
Certain Answers

AbstractThe Guarded Negation Fragment (GNFO) is a fragment of first-order logic that contains all positive existential formulas, can express the first-order translations of basic modal logic and of many description logics, along with many sentences that arise in databases. It has been shown that the syntax of GNFO is restrictive enough so that computational problems such as validity and satisfiability are still decidable. This suggests that, in spite of its expressive power, GNFO formulas are amenable to novel optimizations. In this article we study the model theory of GNFO formulas. Our results include effective preservation theorems for GNFO, effective Craig Interpolation and Beth Definability results, and the ability to express the certain answers of queries with respect to a large class of GNFO sentences within very restricted logics.

scholarly journals A Generalisation of AGM Contraction and Revision to Fragments of First-Order Logic

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 147-179
Author(s):  
Zhiqiang Zhuang ◽  
Zhe Wang ◽  
Kewen Wang ◽  
James Delgrande
Keyword(s):  
Propositional Logic ◽  
Description Logics ◽  
Order Logic ◽  
First Order Logic ◽  
Epistemic Entrenchment ◽  
First Order ◽  
General Logic ◽  
Horn Fragment ◽  
Point Of Departure ◽  
Recovery Postulate

AGM contraction and revision assume an underlying logic that contains propositional logic. Consequently, this assumption excludes many useful logics such as the Horn fragment of propositional logic and most description logics. Our goal in this paper is to generalise AGM contraction and revision to (near-)arbitrary fragments of classical first-order logic. To this end, we first define a very general logic that captures these fragments. In so doing, we make the modest assumptions that a logic contains conjunction and that information is expressed by closed formulas or sentences. The resulting logic is called first-order conjunctive logic or FC logic for short. We then take as the point of departure the AGM approach of constructing contraction functions through epistemic entrenchment, that is the entrenchment-based contraction. We redefine entrenchment-based contraction in ways that apply to any FC logic, which we call FC contraction. We prove a representation theorem showing its compliance with all the AGM contraction postulates except for the controversial recovery postulate. We also give methods for constructing revision functions through epistemic entrenchment which we call FC revision; which also apply to any FC logic. We show that if the underlying FC logic contains tautologies then FC revision complies with all the AGM revision postulates. Finally, in the context of FC logic, we provide three methods for generating revision functions via a variant of the Levi Identity, which we call contraction, withdrawal and cut generated revision, and explore the notion of revision equivalence. We show that withdrawal and cut generated revision coincide with FC revision and so does contraction generated revision under a finiteness condition.

scholarly journals The Complexity of Circumscription in DLs

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 717-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Bonatti ◽  
C. Lutz ◽  
F. Wolter
Keyword(s):  
Description Logics ◽  
Default Logic ◽  
Order Logic ◽  
First Order Logic ◽  
First Order ◽  
Alternative Approach ◽  
Default Rules ◽  
Logic Description ◽  
Interesting Alternative ◽  
Natural Way

As fragments of first-order logic, Description logics (DLs) do not provide nonmonotonic features such as defeasible inheritance and default rules. Since many applications would benefit from the availability of such features, several families of nonmonotonic DLs have been developed that are mostly based on default logic and autoepistemic logic. In this paper, we consider circumscription as an interesting alternative approach to nonmonotonic DLs that, in particular, supports defeasible inheritance in a natural way. We study DLs extended with circumscription under different language restrictions and under different constraints on the sets of minimized, fixed, and varying predicates, and pinpoint the exact computational complexity of reasoning for DLs ranging from ALC to ALCIO and ALCQO. When the minimized and fixed predicates include only concept names but no role names, then reasoning is complete for NExpTime^NP. It becomes complete for NP^NExpTime when the number of minimized and fixed predicates is bounded by a constant. If roles can be minimized or fixed, then complexity ranges from NExpTime^NP to undecidability.

scholarly journals A Characterization Theorem for a Modal Description Logic

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Wild ◽  
Lutz Schröder
Keyword(s):  
Description Logic ◽  
Description Logics ◽  
Characterization Theorem ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Order Logic ◽  
First Order Logic ◽  
Standard Description ◽  
First Order ◽  
Information State ◽  
Modal Description

Modal description logics feature modalities that capture dependence of knowledge on parameters such as time, place, or the information state of agents. E.g., the logic S5-ALC combines the standard description logic ALC with an S5-modality that can be understood as an epistemic operator or as representing (undirected) change. This logic embeds into a corresponding modal first-order logic S5-FOL. We prove a modal characterization theorem for this embedding, in analogy to results by van Benthem and Rosen relating ALC to standard first-order logic: We show that S5-ALC with only local roles is, both over finite and over unrestricted models, precisely the bisimulation-invariant fragment of S5-FOL, thus giving an exact description of the expressive power of S5-ALC with only local roles.

scholarly journals The Triguarded Fragment of First-Order Logic

10.29007/m8ts ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Rudolph ◽  
Mantas Simkus
Keyword(s):  
Description Logics ◽  
Past Research ◽  
Order Logic ◽  
First Order Logic ◽  
Crucial Importance ◽  
Natural Assumption ◽  
First Order ◽  
Natural Extensions ◽  
Guarded Fragment ◽  
Definition Of

Past research into decidable fragments of first-order logic (FO) has produced two very prominent fragments: the guarded fragment GF, and the two-variable fragment FO2. These fragments are of crucial importance because they provide significant insights into decidabil- ity and expressiveness of other (computational) logics like Modal Logics (MLs) and various Description Logics (DLs), which play a central role in Verification, Knowledge Represen- tation, and other areas. In this paper, we take a closer look at GF and FO2, and present a new fragment that subsumes them both. This fragment, called the triguarded fragment (denoted TGF), is obtained by relaxing the standard definition of GF: quantification is required to be guarded only for subformulae with three or more free variables. We show that, in the absence of equality, satisfiability in TGF is N2ExpTime-complete, but becomes NExpTime-complete if we bound the arity of predicates by a constant (a natural assumption in the context of MLs and DLs). Finally, we observe that many natural extensions of TGF, including the addition of equality, lead to undecidability.

scholarly journals A Knowledge Level Account of Forgetting

2017 ◽  
Vol 60 ◽  
pp. 1165-1213 ◽  
Author(s):  
James P. Delgrande
Keyword(s):  
Belief Change ◽  
Description Logics ◽  
Knowledge Bases ◽  
Order Logic ◽  
First Order Logic ◽  
Consequence Relation ◽  
First Order ◽  
Formal Systems ◽  
High Level ◽  
Main Definition

Forgetting is an operation on knowledge bases that has been addressed in different areas of Knowledge Representation and with respect to different formalisms, including classical propositional and first-order logic, modal logics, logic programming, and description logics. Definitions of forgetting have been expressed in terms of manipulation of formulas, sets of postulates, isomorphisms between models, bisimulations, second-order quantification, elementary equivalence, and others. In this paper, forgetting is regarded as an abstract belief change operator, independent of the underlying logic. The central thesis is that forgetting amounts to a reduction in the language, specifically the signature, of a logic. The main definition is simple: the result of forgetting a portion of a signature in a theory is given by the set of logical consequences of this theory over the reduced language. This definition offers several advantages. Foremost, it provides a uniform approach to forgetting, with a definition that is applicable to any logic with a well-defined consequence relation. Hence it generalises a disparate set of logic-specific definitions with a general, high-level definition. Results obtained in this approach are thus applicable to all subsumed formal systems, and many results are obtained much more straightforwardly. This view also leads to insights with respect to specific logics: for example, forgetting in first-order logic is somewhat different from the accepted approach. Moreover, the approach clarifies the relation between forgetting and related operations, including belief contraction.

scholarly journals Exact Query Reformulation over Databases with First-order and Description Logics Ontologies

2013 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 885-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Franconi ◽  
V. Kerhet ◽  
N. Ngo
Keyword(s):  
General Framework ◽  
Description Logic ◽  
Description Logics ◽  
Effective Means ◽  
Order Logic ◽  
First Order Logic ◽  
Query Rewriting ◽  
Query Reformulation ◽  
First Order ◽  
Sql Query

We study a general framework for query rewriting in the presence of an arbitrary first-order logic ontology over a database signature. The framework supports deciding the existence of a safe-range first-order equivalent reformulation of a query in terms of the database signature, and if so, it provides an effective approach to construct the reformulation based on interpolation using standard theorem proving techniques (e.g., tableau). Since the reformulation is a safe-range formula, it is effectively executable as an SQL query. At the end, we present a non-trivial application of the framework with ontologies in the very expressive ALCHOIQ description logic, by providing effective means to compute safe-range first-order exact reformulations of queries.

scholarly journals Making Cross Products and Guarded Ontology Languages Compatible

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Bourhis ◽  
Michael Morak ◽  
Andreas Pieris
Keyword(s):  
Description Logics ◽  
Order Logic ◽  
Query Answering ◽  
First Order Logic ◽  
First Order ◽  
Ontology Languages ◽  
Guarded Fragment

Cross products form a useful modelling tool that allows us to express natural statements such as "elephants are bigger than mice", or, more generally, to define relations that connect every instance in a relation with every instance in another relation. Despite their usefulness, cross products cannot be expressed using existing guarded ontology languages, such as description logics (DLs) and guarded existential rules. The question that comes up is whether cross products are compatible with guarded ontology languages, and, if not, whether there is a way of making them compatible. This has been already studied for DLs, while for guarded existential rules remains unanswered. Our goal is to give an answer to the above question. To this end, we focus on the guarded fragment of first-order logic (which serves as a unifying framework that subsumes many of the aforementioned ontology languages) extended with cross products, and we investigate the standard tasks of satisfiability and query answering. Interestingly, we isolate relevant fragments that are compatible with cross products.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document