A simultaneous spectral/spatial analysis of turbulent kinetic energy in turbulent channel flow: the effect of the Reynolds number

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Andrade ◽  
R. S. Martins ◽  
Gilmar Mompean ◽  
L. Thais ◽  
Thomas B. Gatski
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Spatial Analysis ◽  
Kinetic Energy ◽  
Turbulent Kinetic Energy ◽  
Channel Flow ◽  
Turbulent Channel Flow

NUMERICAL RESEARCH ON THE EFFECT OF FIBERS ON THE PROPERTY OF TURBULENT FIBER SUSPENSION IN A CHANNEL

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (03) ◽  
pp. 509-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
SUHUA SHEN ◽  
JIANZHONG LIN
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Kinetic Energy ◽  
Turbulent Kinetic Energy ◽  
Channel Flow ◽  
Turbulent Channel Flow ◽  
Fiber Suspension ◽  
Additional Stress ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Navier Stokes Equation ◽  
Fiber Concentration

To explore the rheological property in turbulent channel flow of fiber suspensions, the equation of probability distribution function for mean fiber orientation and the Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equation with the term of additional stress resulted from fibers were solved with numerical methods to get the distributions of the mean velocity and turbulent kinetic energy. The simulation results show that the effect of fibers on turbulent channel flow is equivalent to an additional viscosity. The turbulent velocity profiles of fiber suspension become gradually sharper by increasing the fiber concentration and/or decreasing the Reynolds number. The turbulent kinetic energy will increase with increasing Reynolds number and fiber concentration.

scholarly journals Maximum Entropy Method for Solving the Turbulent Channel Flow Problem

Entropy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 675 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.-W. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Kinetic Energy ◽  
Maximum Entropy ◽  
Turbulent Kinetic Energy ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Channel Flow ◽  
Flow Problem ◽  
Maximum Entropy Principle ◽  
Turbulent Channel Flow ◽  
Momentum Balance ◽  
Entropy Principle

There are two components in this work that allow for solutions of the turbulent channel flow problem: One is the Galilean-transformed Navier-Stokes equation which gives a theoretical expression for the Reynolds stress (u′v′); and the second the maximum entropy principle which provides the spatial distribution of turbulent kinetic energy. The first concept transforms the momentum balance for a control volume moving at the local mean velocity, breaking the momentum exchange down to its basic components, u′v′, u′2, pressure and viscous forces. The Reynolds stress gradient budget confirms this alternative interpretation of the turbulence momentum balance, as validated with DNS data. The second concept of maximum entropy principle states that turbulent kinetic energy in fully-developed flows will distribute itself until the maximum entropy is attained while conforming to the physical constraints. By equating the maximum entropy state with maximum allowable (viscous) dissipation at a given Reynolds number, along with other constraints, we arrive at function forms (inner and outer) for the turbulent kinetic energy. This allows us to compute the Reynolds stress, then integrate it to obtain the velocity profiles in channel flows. The results agree well with direct numerical simulation (DNS) data at Reτ = 400 and 1000.

Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to

2015 ◽  
Vol 774 ◽  
pp. 395-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myoungkyu Lee ◽  
Robert D. Moser
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Direct Numerical Simulation ◽  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Channel Flow ◽  
Turbulent Channel Flow ◽  
Streamwise Velocity ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Layer Structures ◽  
High Reynolds

A direct numerical simulation of incompressible channel flow at a friction Reynolds number ($\mathit{Re}_{{\it\tau}}$) of 5186 has been performed, and the flow exhibits a number of the characteristics of high-Reynolds-number wall-bounded turbulent flows. For example, a region where the mean velocity has a logarithmic variation is observed, with von Kármán constant ${\it\kappa}=0.384\pm 0.004$. There is also a logarithmic dependence of the variance of the spanwise velocity component, though not the streamwise component. A distinct separation of scales exists between the large outer-layer structures and small inner-layer structures. At intermediate distances from the wall, the one-dimensional spectrum of the streamwise velocity fluctuation in both the streamwise and spanwise directions exhibits $k^{-1}$ dependence over a short range in wavenumber $(k)$. Further, consistent with previous experimental observations, when these spectra are multiplied by $k$ (premultiplied spectra), they have a bimodal structure with local peaks located at wavenumbers on either side of the $k^{-1}$ range.

Turbulent kinetic energy production and flow structures in flows past smooth and rough walls

2019 ◽  
Vol 866 ◽  
pp. 897-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Orlandi
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Kinetic Energy ◽  
Turbulent Kinetic Energy ◽  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Energy Production ◽  
Compressive Strain ◽  
Turnover Time ◽  
Flow Structures ◽  
Wall Region ◽  
Rate Of Dissipation

Data available in the literature from direct numerical simulations of two-dimensional turbulent channels by Lee & Moser (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 774, 2015, pp. 395–415), Bernardini et al. (J. Fluid Mech., 742, 2014, pp. 171–191), Yamamoto & Tsuji (Phys. Rev. Fluids, vol. 3, 2018, 012062) and Orlandi et al. (J. Fluid Mech., 770, 2015, pp. 424–441) in a large range of Reynolds number have been used to find that $S^{\ast }$ the ratio between the eddy turnover time ($q^{2}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}$, with $q^{2}$ being twice the turbulent kinetic energy and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}$ the isotropic rate of dissipation) and the time scale of the mean deformation ($1/S$), scales very well with the Reynolds number in the wall region. The good scaling is due to the eddy turnover time, although the turbulent kinetic energy and the rate of isotropic dissipation show a Reynolds dependence near the wall; $S^{\ast }$, as well as $-\langle Q\rangle =\langle s_{ij}s_{ji}\rangle -\langle \unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{i}\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{i}/2\rangle$ are linked to the flow structures, and also the latter quantity presents a good scaling near the wall. It has been found that the maximum of turbulent kinetic energy production $P_{k}$ occurs in the layer with $-\langle Q\rangle \approx 0$, that is, where the unstable sheet-like structures roll-up to become rods. The decomposition of $P_{k}$ in the contribution of elongational and compressive strain demonstrates that the two contributions present a good scaling. However, the good scaling holds when the wall and the outer structures are separated. The same statistics have been evaluated by direct simulations of turbulent flows in the presence of different types of corrugations on both walls. The flow physics in the layer near the plane of the crests is strongly linked to the shape of the surface and it has been demonstrated that the $u_{2}$ (normal to the wall) fluctuations are responsible for the modification of the flow structures, for the increase of the resistance and of the turbulent kinetic energy production.

scholarly journals Discussion on improved method of turbulence model for supercritical water flow and heat transfer

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (5 Part A) ◽  
pp. 2729-2741
Author(s):  
Zhenchuan Wang ◽  
Guoli Qi ◽  
Meijun Li
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Kinetic Energy ◽  
Turbulent Kinetic Energy ◽  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Buoyancy Effect ◽  
Improved Method ◽  
Production Term ◽  
Flow And Heat Transfer ◽  
Effect Model

The turbulence model fails in supercritical fluid-flow and heat transfer simulation, owing to the drastic change of thermal properties. The inappropriate buoyancy effect model and the improper turbulent Prandtl number model are several of these factors lead to the original low-Reynolds number turbulence model unable to predict the wall temperature for vertically heated tubes under the deteriorate heat transfer conditions. This paper proposed a simplified improved method to modify the turbulence model, using the generalized gradient diffusion hypothesis approximation model for the production term of the turbulent kinetic energy due to the buoyancy effect, using a turbulence Prandtl number model for the turbulent thermal diffusivity instead of the constant number. A better agreement was accomplished by the improved turbulence model compared with the experimental data. The main reason for the over-predicted wall temperature by the original turbulence model is the misuse of the buoyancy effect model. In the improved model, the production term of the turbulent kinetic energy is much higher than the results calculated by the original turbulence model, especially in the boundary-layer. A more accurate model for the production term of the turbulent kinetic energy is the main direction of further modification for the low Reynolds number turbulence model.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document