Critical assessment of new risk factors for breast cancer: considerations for development of an improved risk prediction model

2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J Santen ◽  
Norman F Boyd ◽  
Rowan T Chlebowski ◽  
Steven Cummings ◽  
Jack Cuzick ◽  
...  

The majority of candidates for breast cancer prevention have not accepted tamoxifen because of the perception of an unfavorable risk/benefit ratio and the acceptance of raloxifene remains to be determined. One means of improving this ratio is to identify women at very high risk of breast cancer. Family history, age, atypia in a benign biopsy, and reproductive factors are the main parameters currently used to determine risk. The most powerful risk factor, mammographic density, is not presently employed routinely. Other potentially important factors are plasma estrogen and androgen levels, bone density, weight gain, age of menopause, and fracture history, which are also not currently used in a comprehensive risk prediction model because of lack of prospective validation. The Breast Cancer Prevention Collaborative Group (BCPCG) met to critically examine and prioritize risk factors that might be selected for further testing by multivariate analysis using existing clinical material. The BCPCG reached a consensus that quantitative breast density, state of the art plasma estrogen and androgen measurements, history of fracture and height loss, BMI, and waist–hip ratio had sufficient priority for further testing. As a practical approach, these parameters could be added to the existing Tyrer–Cuzick model which encompasses factors included in both the Claus and Gail models. The BCPCG analyzed potentially available clinical material from previous prospective studies and determined that a large case/control study to evaluate these new factors might be feasible at this time.

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2399-2399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun Chao ◽  
Lanfang Xu ◽  
Leila Family ◽  
Hairong Xu

Abstract Introduction: Chemotherapy induced anemia (CIA) is associated with an array of symptoms that can negatively impact patients' quality of life. The incidence and severity of CIA vary significantly depending on the cancer type and chemotherapy regimen administered. Several patient characteristics, such as age, gender, renal function and pre-treatment hemoglobin (Hb) and albumin level have also been reported to be associated with the risk of CIA. However, a comprehensive risk prediction model for CIA is lacking. Here we sought to develop a risk prediction model for severe CIA (Hb<8 g/dl) in breast cancer patients that accounts for detailed chemotherapy regimens and novel risk factors for anemia. Methods: Women diagnosed with incident breast cancer at age 18 and older between 2000-2012 at Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC)and initiated myelosuppressivechemotherapy before June 30, 2013 were included. Women who did not have any hemoglobin measurement prior or during the course of chemotherapy were excluded. Those who had the following conditions prior to chemotherapy were also excluded: less than 12 months KPSC membership, anemia, transfusion, radiation therapy or bone marrow transplant. Potential predictors considered included established CIA risk factors, such as patient demographic characteristics, cancer stage at diagnosis, chemotherapy regimens, and laboratory measurements (Table 1). In addition, several novel risk factors were also evaluated for their ability to predict severe CIA; these included recent cancer surgery and radiation therapy, chronic comorbidities (Table 1) and mediation use (Table 1).All data were collected from KPSC's electronic health records. The cohort was randomly split into a training set (50%) and a validation set (50%). Logistic regression was used to develop the risk prediction model for severe CIA. Predictors that showed a crude association with severe CIA with an odds ratio > 1.5 or <0.67 (i.e., 1/1.5) or a p-value <0.10 in the training set were included for predictive model selection. A stepwise model selection method was used with a p-value cut-off at 0.05. The model performance of the selected final model was evaluated in the validation set usingHosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test and the area underthe receiver operating characteristiccurve (AUC). Results: A total of 11,291 breast cancer patients were included in the study. The mean age at diagnosis was 55 years. The majority of the patients were of non-Hispanic white race/ethnicity (57%). Of these, 3.0% developed severe CIA during chemotherapy. The following factors were positively associated with risk of developing severe anemia in the crude analyses and were thus included for model selection: age >65, advanced stages, length of KPSC membership, time between cancer diagnosis to chemotherapy, prior radiation therapy, vascular disease, renal disease, hypertension, osteoarthritis, use of steroids, use of diuretics, use of calcium channel blockers, use of statins, chemotherapy regimens, prior surgery, anti-coagulant use, calendar periods, and baseline ALP, HCT, HGB, lymphocyte count, MCH, MCV, ANC, platelet, RBC, RDW, WBC and GFR (calculated from creatinine). The final model included age, stage, chemotherapy regimen, corticosteroid use, and baseline Hb, MCV and GFR. The odds ratio and 95% confidence interval estimates of variables in the final model in the training set and the validation set are both shown in Table 2. This prediction model achieved an AUC of 0.76 in the validation set, and passed the goodness-of-fit test (test statistics was 0.17). Conclusion: The risk prediction model incorporating traditional and novel CIA risk factors appeared to perform well and may assist clinicians to increase surveillance for patients at high risk of severe CIA during chemotherapy. Disclosures Chao: Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Xu:Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Family:Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Xu:Amgen Inc.: Research Funding.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 1462-1462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Lee ◽  
Nasim Mavaddat ◽  
Amber N. Wilcox ◽  
Alex P. Cunningham ◽  
Tim Carver ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 1708-1718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Lee ◽  
Nasim Mavaddat ◽  
Amber N. Wilcox ◽  
Alex P. Cunningham ◽  
Tim Carver ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Julie R. Palmer ◽  
Gary Zirpoli ◽  
Kimberly A. Bertrand ◽  
Tracy Battaglia ◽  
Leslie Bernstein ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Breast cancer risk prediction models are used to identify high-risk women for early detection, targeted interventions, and enrollment into prevention trials. We sought to develop and evaluate a risk prediction model for breast cancer in US Black women, suitable for use in primary care settings. METHODS Breast cancer relative risks and attributable risks were estimated using data from Black women in three US population-based case-control studies (3,468 breast cancer cases; 3,578 controls age 30-69 years) and combined with SEER age- and race-specific incidence rates, with incorporation of competing mortality, to develop an absolute risk model. The model was validated in prospective data among 51,798 participants of the Black Women's Health Study, including 1,515 who developed invasive breast cancer. A second risk prediction model was developed on the basis of estrogen receptor (ER)–specific relative risks and attributable risks. Model performance was assessed by calibration (expected/observed cases) and discriminatory accuracy (C-statistic). RESULTS The expected/observed ratio was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.95 to 1.07). Age-adjusted C-statistics were 0.58 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.59) overall and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.68) among women younger than 40 years. These measures were almost identical in the model based on estrogen receptor–specific relative risks and attributable risks. CONCLUSION Discriminatory accuracy of the new model was similar to that of the most frequently used questionnaire-based breast cancer risk prediction models in White women, suggesting that effective risk stratification for Black women is now possible. This model may be especially valuable for risk stratification of young Black women, who are below the ages at which breast cancer screening is typically begun.


Breast Care ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-106
Author(s):  
Dirk Olaf Bauerschlag ◽  
Christian Schem ◽  
Christoph Mundhenke ◽  
Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein ◽  
Walter Jonat ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaona Jia ◽  
Mirza Mansoor Baig ◽  
Farhaan Mirza ◽  
Hamid GholamHosseini

Background and Objective. Current cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk models are typically based on traditional laboratory-based predictors. The objective of this research was to identify key risk factors that affect the CVD risk prediction and to develop a 10-year CVD risk prediction model using the identified risk factors. Methods. A Cox proportional hazard regression method was applied to generate the proposed risk model. We used the dataset from Framingham Original Cohort of 5079 men and women aged 30-62 years, who had no overt symptoms of CVD at the baseline; among the selected cohort 3189 had a CVD event. Results. A 10-year CVD risk model based on multiple risk factors (such as age, sex, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, systolic blood pressure (SBP), cigarettes per day, pulse rate, and diabetes) was developed in which heart rate was identified as one of the novel risk factors. The proposed model achieved a good discrimination and calibration ability with C-index (receiver operating characteristic (ROC)) being 0.71 in the validation dataset. We validated the model via statistical and empirical validation. Conclusion. The proposed CVD risk prediction model is based on standard risk factors, which could help reduce the cost and time required for conducting the clinical/laboratory tests. Healthcare providers, clinicians, and patients can use this tool to see the 10-year risk of CVD for an individual. Heart rate was incorporated as a novel predictor, which extends the predictive ability of the past existing risk equations.


2013 ◽  
Vol 105 (5) ◽  
pp. 361-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah A. Boggs ◽  
Lynn Rosenberg ◽  
Michael J. Pencina ◽  
Lucile L. Adams-Campbell ◽  
Julie R. Palmer

Breast Care ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Lammert ◽  
Sabine Grill ◽  
Marion Kiechle

Increasing rates of obesity, lack of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and frequent alcohol consumption are major lifestyle-related risk factors for breast cancer. In fact, it has been estimated that about one-third of breast cancer cases are attributable to factors women can change. Most research has focused on examining the impact of one single exposure on breast cancer risk while adjusting for other risk modifiers. Capitalizing on big data, major efforts have been made to evaluate the combined impact of well-established lifestyle factors on overall breast cancer risk. At the individual level, data indicate that even simple behavior modifications could have a considerable impact on breast cancer prevention. Moreover, there is emerging new evidence that adopting a healthy lifestyle may be particularly relevant for women with hereditary susceptibility to breast cancer. On the absolute risk scale, studies suggest that the presence of certain risk factors, such as excessive body weight, had a substantially higher impact on breast cancer risk if women had a hereditary predisposition to cancer. The existing body of knowledge gives the medical professionals guidance as to which factors to focus on when counseling patients. However, well-designed randomized controlled trials utilizing objective methods are crucial to providing concrete recommendations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document