How to target estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer?

2003 ◽  
pp. 261-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Rochefort ◽  
M Glondu ◽  
M E Sahla ◽  
N Platet ◽  
M Garcia

Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers generally have a better prognosis and are often responsive to anti-estrogen therapy, which is the first example of a successful therapy targeted on a specific protein, the ER. Unfortunately ER-negative breast cancers are more aggressive and unresponsive to anti-estrogens. Other targeted therapies are thus urgently needed, based on breast cancer oncogene inhibition or suppressor gene activation as far as molecular studies have demonstrated the alteration of expression, or structure of these genes in human breast cancer. Using the MDA-MB.231 human breast cancer cell line as a model of ER-negative breast cancers, we are investigating two of these approaches in our laboratory. Our first approach was to transfect the ER or various ER-deleted variants into an ER-negative cell line in an attempt to recover anti-estrogen responsiveness. The unliganded receptor, and surprisingly estradiol, were both found to inhibit tumor growth and invasiveness in vitro and in vivo. The mechanisms of these inhibitions in ER-negative cancer cells are being studied, in an attempt to target the ER sequence responsible for such inhibition in these cancer cells. Another strategy is trying to inhibit the activity or expression of an oncogene specifically overexpressed in most breast cancers. This approach was recently shown by others to be efficient in breast cancer therapy with HER2-Neu oncogene amplification using Herceptin. Without excluding other molecular putative targets, we have focused our research on cathepsin D as a potential target, since it is often overexpressed in aggressive human breast cancers, including ER-negative tumors, and rarely associated with HER2-Neu amplification. Our first results obtained in vitro on cell lines and in vivo in tumor xenografts in nude mice, illustrate that the mode of action of cathepsin D in breast cancer is useful to guide the development of these therapies. In the past 20 years we have learned that the action of cathepsin D is complex and involves both intracellular and extracellular activities due to its proteolytic activity and to interactions with membrane components without catalytic activity. Each of these mechanisms could be potentially inhibited in an attempt to prevent tumor growth. Breast cancer is a very heterogeneous and multigenic disease and different targeted therapies adapted to each category of breast cancer are therefore required. Validated assays in the primary tumor of molecular markers such as ER, HER2-Neu and cathepsin D should help to predict which targeted therapy should be applied to cure breast cancer patients.

1998 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 841-851 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.Jeffrey Baumann ◽  
Tammy L. Bush ◽  
Doreen E. Cross-Doersen ◽  
Elizabeth A. Cashman ◽  
Paul S. Wright ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 1385-1394 ◽  
Author(s):  
YUICHI KINOSHITA ◽  
KATSUHIKO YOSHIZAWA ◽  
KEI HAMAZAKI ◽  
YUKO EMOTO ◽  
TAKASHI YURI ◽  
...  

Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 4593-4606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ka-Wai Tam ◽  
Chi-Tang Ho ◽  
Shih-Hsin Tu ◽  
Wen-Jui Lee ◽  
Ching-Shui Huang ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 628
Author(s):  
Jilei Zhang ◽  
Rong Lu ◽  
Yongguo Zhang ◽  
Żaneta Matuszek ◽  
Wen Zhang ◽  
...  

Background: Transfer RNA (tRNA) queuosine (Q)-modifications occur specifically in 4 cellular tRNAs at the wobble anticodon position. tRNA Q-modification in human cells depends on the gut microbiome because the microbiome product queuine is required for its installation by the enzyme Q tRNA ribosyltransferase catalytic subunit 1 (QTRT1) encoded in the human genome. Queuine is a micronutrient from diet and microbiome. Although tRNA Q-modification has been studied for a long time regarding its properties in decoding and tRNA fragment generation, how QTRT1 affects tumorigenesis and the microbiome is still poorly understood. Results: We generated single clones of QTRT1-knockout breast cancer MCF7 cells using Double Nickase Plasmid. We also established a QTRT1-knockdown breast MDA-MB-231 cell line. The impacts of QTRT1 deletion or reduction on cell proliferation and migration in vitro were evaluated using cell culture, while the regulations on tumor growth in vivo were evaluated using a xenograft BALB/c nude mouse model. We found that QTRT1 deficiency in human breast cancer cells could change the functions of regulation genes, which are critical in cell proliferation, tight junction formation, and migration in human breast cancer cells in vitro and a breast tumor mouse model in vivo. We identified that several core bacteria, such as Lachnospiraceae, Lactobacillus, and Alistipes, were markedly changed in mice post injection with breast cancer cells. The relative abundance of bacteria in tumors induced from wildtype cells was significantly higher than those of QTRT1 deficiency cells. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that the QTRT1 gene and tRNA Q-modification altered cell proliferation, junctions, and microbiome in tumors and the intestine, thus playing a critical role in breast cancer development.


2021 ◽  
Vol 08 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulina J. Villanueva ◽  
Denisse A Gutierrez ◽  
Lisett Contreras ◽  
Karla Parra ◽  
Giulio Francia ◽  
...  

Background: Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women worldwide. Pyronaridine (PND), an antimalarial drug, was shown to exert anticancer activity on seventeen different human cancer cells, seven from female breast tissue. Additionally, PND induced apoptosis via mitochondrial depolarization, alteration of cell cycle progression, and DNA intercalation. However, the molecular target of PND in cells was not elucidated. Objective: Here, we have further investigated PND's mode of action by using transcriptome analysis. Preclinical studies were also performed to determine whether PND could affect tumor progression in a human breast cancer xenograft in mice. Moreover, we assessed the combined efficacy of PND with well-known anticancer drugs. Methods: Transcriptome analyses of PND-treated cancer cells were performed. Topoisomerase II activity was evaluated by an in vitro assay. In addition, daily oral administration of PND was given to mice with human breast cancer xenografts. The differential nuclear staining assay measured in-vitro cell toxicity. Results: The transcriptome signatures suggested that PND might act as a topoisomerase II inhibitor. Thus, topoisomerase inhibition assays were performed, providing evidence that PND is a bona fide topoisomerase II inhibitor. Also, in-vivo studies suggest that PND hinders tumor progression. Besides, combination studies of PND with anticancer drugs Cisplatin and Gemcitabine revealed higher cytotoxicity against cancer cells than individual drug administration. Conclusion: The findings provide evidence that PND is a topoisomerase II inhibitor and can hinder cancer progression in an animal model, further demonstrating PND's favorable characteristics as a repurposed anticancer drug.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document