CHANGES IN PITUITARY RESPONSIVENESS TO LUTEINIZING HORMONE RELEASING HORMONE IN RAMS EXPOSED TO ARTIFICIAL PHOTOPERIODS

1977 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 519-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. A. LINCOLN

SUMMARY Six adult Soay rams were subjected to an artificial lighting régime of alternating 4 month periods of long days (16 h light: 8 h darkness) and short days (8 h light: 16 h darkness) which induced a seasonal cycle in testicular development and regression during a period of 32 weeks. On 15 occasions during the study pituitary responsiveness was assessed by measuring the concentration of luteinizing hormone (LH) in jugular blood samples collected at frequent intervals after the intravenous injection of 1 pg synthetic luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH). It was shown that both the magnitude and duration of the induced release of LH changed in relation to the photoperiod; the magnitude was greatest during long days when the rams were sexually quiescent, while the duration of the LH release was greatest during short days at the peak of testicular activity. This pattern of responsiveness was modified by implantation of the rams with testosterone.

1978 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 389-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. CHANTARAPRATEEP ◽  
M. THIBIER

Six young postpubertal bulls were studied in two experiments, 3 months apart. In experiment 1, three bulls received i.m. injections of dexamethasone (20 mg) and 5 h later these animals plus three control bulls received i.m. injections of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH, 250 μg). In experiment 2, the controls from experiment 1 received dexamethasone and the treated animals from experiment 1 acted as controls for experiment 2. All bulls also received an i.m. injection of 250 μg LH-RH on day 2 of each experiment. The concentrations of LH and testosterone in samples of jugular blood were determined by radioimmunoassay. There were no significant differences in the patterns of testosterone and LH release between the two experiments. On day 1, the response of LH to LH-RH was significantly (P < 0·05) reduced by dexamethasone, but on day 2 values in the control and treated groups were similar although significantly (P<0·05) lower than values on day 1. The response of testosterone to LH-RH was not affected by dexamethasone. These results are discussed in terms of the site of action at which dexamethasone may act to depress the release of LH.


1977 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. BARDEN ◽  
A. BETTERIDGE

The addition of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH) to cultures of monolayers of rat anterior pituitary cells was shown to increase both the concentrations of prostaglandins E1 and E2 (PGE) in the cells and the release of LH over similar ranges of concentrations of LH-RH (10−6 to 10−10 mol/l). The peak concentration of PGE was observed after 2·5 h. The stimulation of the level of PGE in the cells by LH-RH was completely inhibited by two inhibitors of prostaglandin synthetase, which only partially inhibited the stimulation of LH release. Therefore the increased concentration of PGE was not obligatory for the effect of LH-RH on LH release. It was also shown that monobutyryl cyclic AMP stimulated the intracellular concentration of PGE and it is suggested that the stimulation of PGE levels may be mediated by increased levels of cyclic AMP in the cells after the addition of LH-RH.


1980 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 1100-1104 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Peter

Sexually mature male goldfish, acclimated to 12–14 °C, were injected intraperitoneally with luteinizing hormone – releasing hormone (LH-RH) or the superactive analogue des-Gly10-[D-Ala6]-LH-RH ethylamide (G-A-LH-RH-E). Treatments were a single injection, two injections 12 h apart, and three injections 24 h apart at dosages of 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 μg/g body weight. Blood samples were taken at 1 or 1.5, 6, and 24 h after the last injection for measurement of serum gonadotropin (GtH) by radioimmunoassay. Serum GtH levels were highest following two injections of LH-RH or G-A-LH-RH-E given 12 h apart; a single injection of the peptides produced the smallest change in GtH levels. The analogue caused a response of longer duration than did LH-RH in certain circumstances. The data also demonstrate that self-potentiation and self-suppression of response can occur under certain treatment conditions with LH-RH and the analogue.


1979 ◽  
Vol 57 (12) ◽  
pp. 1388-1392 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Fevre ◽  
D. Jordan ◽  
J. Tourniaire ◽  
R. Mornex

The mechanism of action of adiphenine on in vitro rat anterior pituitary LH release was studied and compared with that of the physiological stimulator luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH) on LH release. The comparative study showed that adiphenine and LH-RH were able to increase medium LH concentration in a dose-dependent manner and had similar time courses of action between 1 and 4 h incubation. However, there were several main differences between the effects of adiphenine and LH-RH. The adiphenine action was not calcium dependent, was inhibited in a high K+ medium concentration, and was substituted after energy depression. It is concluded that adiphenine probably acts near the ultimate steps of the LH release pathway and could be a useful pharmacological tool for studying the mechanism of LH release.


1974 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 333-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. L. JEFFCOATE ◽  
D. T. HOLLAND

SUMMARY Serum samples from rabbits, sheep and rats containing immunoreactive luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH) have been extracted and fractionated by ion exchange chromatography on carboxymethylcellulose followed by radioimmunoassay of the fractions. Control experiments showed that the extraction and chromatographic procedures did not alter the mobility of synthetic LH-RH. Four immunoreactive components of circulating LH-RH in blood samples from various species at various times were identified on CM-cellulose columns. One of these had a mobility identical with that of synthetic LH-RH; of the others, two were eluted before and one after synthetic LH-RH. The nature, site of formation and possible significance of the extra components are discussed.


1977 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. B. CRIGHTON ◽  
J. P. FOSTER

SUMMARY Anoestrous ewes were given two injections of 30 μg synthetic luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH) separated by one of the following intervals: 1·5, 3, 6, 12 or 24 h. The first injection caused an increase in the plasma LH concentration in each animal. The response to the second injection was dependent on the interval between the injections. When the second injection was administered 1·5 h after the first it caused a further increase in the LH concentration to maximal levels which were significantly greater than those induced in the other anoestrous groups. When the second injection was administered 3 h after the first, there was no significant difference between the responses to the two injections although the time to reach the maximal LH concentration was shorter and the height of the LH peak was greater in each animal following the second injection. When the second injection was administered 6,12 or 24 h after the first, the LH response was significantly less, in terms of height and area of the induced peak, than following the first injection. The LH response to the second injection was particularly low in the 12 and 24 h groups. Two injections of 30 μg synthetic LH-RH were also administered at 1·5 h intervals to ewes on either day 10 of the oestrous cycle or at onset of oestrus. The pattern of LH responses in all these animals was similar to that observed in anoestrous ewes injected at 1·5 h intervals. The total LH release, as assessed in terms of area of the induced peaks, was significantly greater in the onset of oestrus group than in the day 10 group or any of the anoestrous groups. Presumably the sensitization–desensitization sequence of the pituitary gland to LH-RH which has been demonstrated, together with the effects of sex steroid hormones, must play an important part in the development and decay of the natural preovulatory LH peak.


1979 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 421-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. E. PICKARD ◽  
A. J. SILVERMAN

Male hamsters were maintained on long (14 h light: 10 h darkness; 14L: 10D) or short (6L: 18D) photoperiods. Animals on short-days had reduced levels of LH in the serum and anterior pituitary gland, decreased androgen in the circulation and regressed testes and accessory sex organs. These same hamsters had significantly raised concentrations of hypothalamic luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH). There was no significant difference in the response to exogenous LH-RH between groups maintained on long- and shortdays. Castration significantly reduced levels of LH-RH in the hypothalamus in the long-day animals but had little effect on this parameter in short-day animals which had already undergone testicular regression. The increased levels of LH-RH in the hypothalami of both intact and castrated hamsters on non-stimulatory photoperiods is interpreted as a decreased release of the neurohormone which subsequently results in a decreased release of LH.


1982 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. MATTERI ◽  
G. P. MOBERG

During treatment with cortisol or ACTH, dairy heifers were given two doses of LH releasing hormone (LH-RH) spaced 1·5 h apart. Serum concentrations of cortisol and LH were monitored during each treatment. Treatment with both ACTH and cortisol raised plasma cortisol levels above the respective saline controls (P<0·001). Neither treatment affected basal LH concentrations. A slight depression in LH response was seen in the cortisol-treated animals after the first LH-RH injection, as shown by a statistically significant depression at three of the sample times. There was no significant difference between treated and control LH values after the second LH-RH administration. Treatment with ACTH resulted in significantly reduced LH values at all sample times after both injections of LH-RH.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document