scholarly journals Role of microRNAs in abiotic and biotic stress resistance in plants

Author(s):  
Charu Lata ◽  
Ram Jatan
2017 ◽  
Vol 134 ◽  
pp. 33-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rambod Abiri ◽  
Noor Azmi Shaharuddin ◽  
Mahmood Maziah ◽  
Zetty Norhana Balia Yusof ◽  
Narges Atabaki ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 437-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai-Tao Shi ◽  
Rong-Jun Li ◽  
Wei Cai ◽  
Wen Liu ◽  
Zheng-Wei Fu ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 1263-1274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pradeep K. Agarwal ◽  
Parinita Agarwal ◽  
M. K. Reddy ◽  
Sudhir K. Sopory

Plants ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tolosa ◽  
Zhang

Plant growth, development, and productivity are adversely affected by environmental stresses such as drought (osmotic stress), soil salinity, cold, oxidative stress, irradiation, and diverse diseases. These impacts are of increasing concern in light of climate change. Noticeably, plants have developed their adaptive mechanism to respond to environmental stresses by transcriptional activation of stress-responsive genes. Among the known transcription factors, DoF, WRKY, MYB, NAC, bZIP, ERF, ARF and HSF are those widely associated with abiotic and biotic stress response in plants. Genome-wide identification and characterization analyses of these transcription factors have been almost completed in major solanaceous food crops, emphasizing these transcription factor families which have much potential for the improvement of yield, stress tolerance, reducing marginal land and increase the water use efficiency of solanaceous crops in arid and semi-arid areas where plant demand more water. Most importantly, transcription factors are proteins that play a key role in improving crop yield under water-deficient areas and a place where the severity of pathogen is very high to withstand the ongoing climate change. Therefore, this review highlights the role of major transcription factors in solanaceous crops, current and future perspectives in improving the crop traits towards abiotic and biotic stress tolerance and beyond. We have tried to accentuate the importance of using genome editing molecular technologies like CRISPR/Cas9, Virus-induced gene silencing and some other methods to improve the plant potential in giving yield under unfavorable environmental conditions.


2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 709-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bob Asselbergh ◽  
David De Vleesschauwer ◽  
Monica Höfte

Plants are obliged to defend themselves against a wide range of biotic and abiotic stresses. Complex regulatory signaling networks mount an appropriate defense response depending on the type of stress that is perceived. In response to abiotic stresses such as drought, cold, and salinity, the function of abscisic acid (ABA) is well documented: elevation of plant ABA levels and activation of ABA-responsive signaling result in regulation of stomatal aperture and expression of stress-responsive genes. In response to pathogens, the role of ABA is more obscure and is a research topic that has long been overlooked. This article aims to evaluate and review the reported modes of ABA action on pathogen defense and highlight recent advances in deciphering the complex role of ABA in plant–pathogen interactions. The proposed mechanisms responsible for positive or negative effects of ABA on pathogen defense are discussed, as well as the regulation of ABA signaling and in planta ABA concentrations by beneficial and pathogenic microorganisms. In addition, the fast-growing number of reports that characterize antagonistic and synergistic interactions between abiotic and biotic stress responses point to ABA as an essential component in integrating and fine-tuning abiotic and biotic stress-response signaling networks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document