Case Study of the Evolution of Exposure Risk Hedging Strategy Since the Asian Crisis: Korean Automobile Companies

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 29-46
Author(s):  
Dong-Gyun Kim
2021 ◽  
pp. 99-107
Author(s):  
Fakhraddin Akhmedov ◽  
Mhd Zeitoun ◽  
Humssi Al

The banking system is affected by uncertainties related to the evolution of pandemic. One of the identified risks is that of a fluctuation of rates. Volatility of Interest rates is one of the major risks for the banking system. Therefore, financial engineering can be used as a very important hedging practice for banks against such a risk. The aim of this study is to develop a risk hedging mechanism to better overcome market volatility by hedging position against the exposure to interest rate risk based on credit derivatives. Therefore, this study uses Interest Rate Swaps (IRS)s to better hedge the exposure of banks to interest rate fluctuations in stress conditions giving consideration to the case study of banks in Syria in optimizing hedging practices based on Interest Rate Swaps. The aim is to use financial engineering to provide banks with a hedging technique to better absorb shocks in times of stress conditions. This has been discussed and illustrated with visual model diagrams. The case study of banks in Syria is not just the story of individual banks but a window into how to hedge the exposure of banks in stress conditions. In the end, most banking crises are quite similar. The recommendations set out in this study provide banks with an optimized hedging practice which is not part of current financial engineering at banks in Syria.


Author(s):  
Michael Schiltz

The main aim of this chapter is to demonstrate how the implementation of an intra-branch exchange risk hedging strategy can be traced cross-sectionally, that is, by means of snapshots of banking practice at certain points in time. After documenting the Yokohama Specie Bank (YSB)’s early history, it is demonstrated how the bank went through different managerial phases. YSB development in China on a silver basis is explained as a natural consequence of hedging practice, in contrast to the tendency to treat the latter as an anomaly. At all times, the bank could not neglect the realities of the world’s monetary geography. Willingly or not, YSB’s cadre had to take into account the fact that the bank’s center of gravity would, almost inevitably, move towards Shanghai; YSB’s decentralized operating in the many industrial and commercial centers of Manchuria was the consequence of government policy, on the one hand, and the severely limited credit conditions within the regions, on the other.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-114
Author(s):  
Soul Park ◽  
Kimberly Peh

AbstractThe emergence of new nuclear aspirants has posed a great threat to the post-Cold War global non-proliferation regime. These states have adopted a nuclear hedging strategy that has been deemed both strategically risky and politically difficult to maintain. Yet, hedging has not automatically resulted in nuclearisation. We analyse the conditions under which a nuclear hedger shifts its nuclear policy towards one of restraint. Drawing insights from prospect theory, we argue that a nuclear policy shift occurs when a nuclear hedger gains an asymmetric leverage vis-à-vis its adversary. Specifically, a hedging strategy that is based on loss aversion will only be abandoned when a shift in the nuclear aspirant's reference point occurs during negotiations. To test our theoretical arguments, we conduct an in-depth case study of North Korea's nuclear policies throughout the 1990s and 2000s. The empirical study of the changes in North Korea's negotiating stance during the Agreed Framework negotiations and the Six-Party Talks supports our asymmetric leverage thesis. We conclude with broad policy implications for the non-proliferation regime.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document