Effect of implant fixation method on adhesions formation in IPOM hernia repair: a systematic review

2022 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
V.P. Armashov ◽  
A.P. Oettinger ◽  
D.B. Lomaia ◽  
S.A. Makarov ◽  
N.L. Matveev
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amjad Qabbani ◽  
Omar M. Aboumarzouk ◽  
Tamer ElBakry ◽  
Abdulla Al‐Ansari ◽  
Mohamed S. Elakkad

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Abdulkarim ◽  
Prasad Ellanti ◽  
Nicola Motterlini ◽  
Tom Fahey ◽  
John M. O’Byrne

The optimal method of fixation for primary total hip replacements (THR), particularly fixation with or without the use of cement is still controversial. In a systematic review and metaanalysis of all randomized controlled trials comparing cemented versus uncemented THRS available in the published literature, we found that there is no significant difference between cemented and uncemented THRs in terms of implant survival as measured by the revision rate. Better short-term clinical outcome, particularly an improved pain score can be obtained with cemented fixation. However, the results are unclear for the long-term clinical and functional outcome between the two groups. No difference was evident in the mortality and the post operative complication rate. On the other hand, the radiographic findings were variable and do not seem to correlate with clinical findings as differences in the surgical technique and prosthesis design might be associated with the incidence of osteolysis. We concluded in our review that cemented THR is similar if not superior to uncemented THR, and provides better short term clinical outcomes. Further research, improved methodology and longer follow up are necessary to better define specific subgroups of patients in whom the relative benefits of cemented and uncemented implant fixation can be clearly demonstrated.


Author(s):  
Benjamin Clapp ◽  
Marah Hamdan ◽  
Roshni Mandania ◽  
Jisoo Kim ◽  
Jesus Gamez ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 402 (7) ◽  
pp. 1023-1037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dunja Kokotovic ◽  
Jakob Burcharth ◽  
Frederik Helgstrand ◽  
Ismail Gögenur

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 230949902096612
Author(s):  
Jian Yu ◽  
Chao Zhang ◽  
Wen-Ming Chen ◽  
Dahang Zhao ◽  
Pengfei chu ◽  
...  

Purpose: Implant loosening in tibia after primary total ankle replacement (TAR) is one of the common postoperative problems in TAR. Innovations in implant structure design may ideally reduce micromotion at the bone–implant interface and enhance the bone-implant fixation and initial stability, thus eventually prevents long-term implant loosening. This study aimed to investigate (1) biomechanical characteristics at the bone–implant interface and (2) the influence of design features, such as radius, height, and length. Methods: A total of 101 finite-element models were created based on four commercially available implants. The models predicted micromotion at the bone–implant interface, and we investigated the impact of structural parameters, such as radius, length, and height. Results: Our results suggested that stem-type implants generally required the highest volume of bone resection before implantation, while peg-type implants required the lowest. Compared with central fixation features (stem and keel), peripherally distributed geometries (bar and peg) were associated with lower initial micromotions. The initial stability of all types of implant design can be optimized by decreasing fixation size, such as reducing the radius of the bars and pegs and lowering the height. Conclusion: Peg-type tibial implant design may be a promising fixation method, which is required with a minimum bone resection volume and yielded minimum micromotion under an extreme axial loading scenario. Present models can serve as a useful platform to build upon to help physicians or engineers when making incremental improvements related to implant design.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-38
Author(s):  
Vaaiga Autagavaia ◽  
Jamie-Lee Rahiri ◽  
Melanie Lauti ◽  
Lydia Poole ◽  
Garth Poole ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document