Possibilities of preventive treatment of tension-type headache in children and adolescents

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (4. Vyp. 2) ◽  
pp. 31 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. Shipilova ◽  
N. N. Zavadenko ◽  
Yu. E. Nesterovskiy
Keyword(s):  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Tension Type Headache ◽  
Type Headache

Tension-type headache in children and adolescents: comparative study of the effectiveness of preventive therapy methods

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-21
Author(s):  
Nikolay N. Zavadenko ◽  
Elena M. Shypilova ◽  
Yuriy E. Nesterovskiy
Keyword(s):  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Daily Activity ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Tension Type Headache ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Acid Hydrochloride ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Type Headache ◽  
Group 1

Introduction. Late and inaccurate diagnosis of tension-type headache (TTH) leads to the lack of timely rational treatment. In children and adolescents with TTH, the role of comorbid disorders that affect the course of TTH and can contribute to their chronification is not sufficiently taken into account. Meanwhile, with timely diagnosis and adequate treatment of TTH in many children and adolescents, a significant improvement in the disease’s course and the prognosis is achieved, and clinical remission is possible. Considering the high prevalence of TTH among children and adolescents, the decline in their quality of life, and the high frequency of comorbid disorders, it is reasonable to develop effective methods of preventive treatment for TTH in this age group. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of monotherapy with γ-amino-β-phenyl butyric acid hydrochloride, amitriptyline, or breathing gymnastics (comparison group) indicated for two months as a preventive treatment of TTH in children and adolescents in the open randomized comparative study in three parallel groups of patients. Material and methods. In an open parallel study, 90 TTH patients aged 8-16 years were divided into three groups of 30 patients (each with 15 boys and 15 girls). Results. Significant differences with the comparison group in the individual response to therapy were confirmed. According to the criterion of a 50% or more reduction in the average number of headache attacks per month in group 1 (γ-amino-β-phenyl butyric acid hydrochloride), the improvement was achieved in 56.7% of patients, in group 2 (amitriptyline) - in 73.3%, in the 3rd group (breathing gymnastics) - in 30%. According to a more strict criterion for reducing the average number of headache attacks per month by 75% or more, the response to therapy was observed in group 1 in 30%. In group 2 - in 23.3%, in group 3 - in 3.3% of patients. In groups 1 and 2, along with a significant decrease in the frequency, duration, and intensity of TTH attacks, a significant improvement in daily activity, a favorable effect on the manifestations of fatigue, anxiety disorders, and sleep disorders associated with TTH was demonstrated. The therapeutic efficacy of breathing gymnastics exercises complex was confirmed in the prevention of TTH with frequency, duration, and intensity reduction of TTH, and diminishing its impact on daily activity, a moderate decrease in manifestations of fatigue, anxiety disorders (by patients’ self-assessment), and improvement in sleep quality.

scholarly journals Global Burden of Headache Disorders in Children and Adolescents 2007–2017

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 250
Author(s):  
Matilde Leonardi ◽  
Licia Grazzi ◽  
Domenico D’Amico ◽  
Paolo Martelletti ◽  
Erika Guastafierro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Tension Type Headache ◽  
Global Burden ◽  
Specific Information ◽  
Headache Disorders ◽  
Substantial Impact ◽  
Public Health Policies ◽  
School Activities ◽  
Type Headache ◽  
Years Lived With Disability

Headache disorders are prevalent and disabling conditions impacting on people of all ages, including children and adolescents with substantial impact on their school activities and leisure time. Our study aims to report specific information on headaches in children and adolescents based on the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study, that provides estimates for incidence, prevalence, fatal and non-fatal outcomes. We relied on 2007 and 2017 GBD estimates for prevalence and Years Lived with Disability (YLDs) at the global level and in WHO regions. The results show that, migraine and tension-type headache (TTH) together account for 37.5% of all-cause prevalence and for 7% of all-cause YLDs. Over the past decade, prevalence rates showed a mild increase of TTH in all ages and of migraine alone for adolescents. The YLDs increased among females of all ages with some regional differences that might be connected to the unequal availability of effective acute and prophylactic treatments across world regions. GBD data support the need to promote public health policies and strategies including diagnosis, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments that are expected to help reduce the disability and burden associated to migraine and TTH among children and adolescents.

Chronic Tension-Type Headache in Children and Adolescents

Cephalalgia ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 830-836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ishaq Abu-Arafeh
Keyword(s):  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Chronic Daily Headache ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Tension Type Headache ◽  
Stressful Events ◽  
Chronic Tension Type Headache ◽  
Daily Headache ◽  
Ihs Criteria ◽  
Type Headache

In this study, the causes, predisposing factors and clinical features of chronic daily headache in children and adolescents were studied within the population of patients attending a specialist headache. The International Headache Society's (IHS) criteria for the diagnosis of chronic tension type headache (CTTH) were assessed for their applicability in the paediatric age group. Over a period of three years, demographic and clinical data were collected prospectively on all children who attended the clinic and suffered from daily attacks of headache. One hundred and fifteen children and adolescents (32% of all clinic population) had chronic daily headache, of whom 93 patients (81%) fulfilled the IHS criteria for the diagnosis of CTTH. They were between 3-15 years of age (mean: 11.1, SD: 2.3) and their female to male ratio was 1.2: 1. Around one third of the patients also suffered from migraine (mainly migraine without aura). The headache was described as mild in 60.9%, moderate 36.5% and severe 2.6%. Headache was located at the forehead in 53% or over the whole of the head in 29.6%. Pain was described as ‘just sore’ or dull by 73.9%. During attacks of headache, at least half the patients reported light intolerance, noise intolerance, anorexia or nausea. Thirty-two percent of patients had at least one underlying chronic disease that may have contributed to the pathogenesis of the CTTH. Eleven percent had serious stressful events related to family illnesses and in four patients headaches were triggered by family bereavement. Fourteen percent were investigated with neuroimaging and 22% were referred for clinical psychology assessment and management. In conclusion, CTTH is a common cause of headache in children attending a specialist headache clinic. The clinical features closely match those of adult population and the IHS criteria for the diagnosis of CTTH can be adapted for use in children. Predisposing stressful risk factors, physical or emotional, are present in a large proportion.

The need for preventive therapy in primary headaches

2011 ◽  
pp. 46-49
Author(s):  
Mario Fernando Prieto Peres ◽  
Daniel Krempel Amado ◽  
André Leite Gonçalves ◽  
Reinaldo Ribeiro ◽  
Jorge Roberto Pagura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Primary Headache ◽  
Preventive Therapy ◽  
Tension Type Headache ◽  
Primary Headaches ◽  
Correct Treatment ◽  
Treatment Type ◽  
Geographical Regions ◽  
Probable Migraine ◽  
Type Headache

Introduction: Primary headaches are common conditions. In Brazil, the prevalence of migraine is 15.2%, tension-type headache 13% and chronic daily headache (CDH) 6.9%. Although frequent disorders a proportion of patients are undertreated. Patients patterns of headache care can trend toward acute medication only and those in need of prevention may not receive it. Objective: To estimate the rates of preventive treatment in primary headache sufferers. Methods: A telephone interview containing questions about headache and socio-demographic characteristics was applied to 3,848 people from 27 States of Brazil, in its five geographical regions. We considered MIDAS > 10 points as a marker for the need of preventive treatment. Patients were asked if they were taking any medication on a daily basis or any treatment to prevent headaches from happening. Subjects were divided into: 1. Those who responded positively for the question regarding preventive treatment regardless of the treatment type. 2. Those who responded positively for the question, but only medications or treatments studied for migraine prevention, labeled as "Correct treatment" 3. Those who responded positively for the question, but only medications or treatments from the prevention consensus (Brazilian Headache Society), labeled as "Consensus treatment" Results: In total, 12.8% of primary headache sufferers had MIDAS higher than 10, meeting criteria for prophylactic treatment, but only 8.4% of them reported it, 3.9% were using a right preventive treatment. The percentage of patients in need for prevention was 24.7% in migraine, 15.6 % in probable migraine, 5 % for tension-type headache (TTH) and 4% for probable TTH. Only 2.6% of migraineurs, 7.5% of probable migraine patients, 4.3% of tension-type headache and 0% of probable TTH received proper preventive treatment Conclusion: Primary headaches are common, debilitating conditions but a substantial proportion of those who might need prevention do not receive it. Patient education, public health initiatives in order to deliver migraine and other primary headaches treatment for the general population should be considered not only in Brazil, but worldwide.

Diagnosis of Headache in Childhood and Adolescence: A Study in 437 Patients

Cephalalgia ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Wöber-Bingöl ◽  
C Wöber ◽  
A Karwautz ◽  
C Vesely ◽  
C Wagner-Ennsgraber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Outpatient Clinic ◽  
International Headache Society ◽  
Tension Type Headache ◽  
Childhood And Adolescence ◽  
Highly Sensitive ◽  
Ihs Criteria ◽  
Type Headache ◽  
Structured Questionnaire

We investigated whether the criteria for idiopathic headache published by the International Headache Society (IHS) are useful in childhood and adolescence and compared the diagnoses according to this classification with those of Vahlquist. We used a semi-structured questionnaire to examine a total of 437 children and adolescents referred consecutively to a headache outpatient clinic. Twenty-eight of 437 patients were excluded because of symptomatic or unclassifiable headache. Of 409 patients with idiopathic headache, 70.4% had definite migraine or tension-type headache (IHS 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2), 20.5% had a migrainous disorder (IHS 1.7) and 9.1% had headache of the tension-type not fulfilling the criteria (IHS 2.3). In the differential diagnosis of migraine and tension-type headache the intensity of pain, aggravation of headache by physical activity, nausea and vomiting were the most important features. The quality of pain, photo- and phonophobia were less helpful and location least important. The duration of migraine attacks was less than 2 h in 19.0% of the migraine patients. In general, the diagnostic criteria of migraine were highly specific but less sensitive, and those of tension-type headache highly sensitive but less specific. The agreement between IHS criteria and those of Vahlquist was marked (kappa = 0.57). We conclude that the IHS criteria are useful for classifying headache in children and adolescents referred to a headache outpatient clinic. A forthcoming modification of the IHS criteria should consider a reduction of the minimum duration of migraine attacks from 2 h to I h and should try to increase the sensitivity of the criteria for migraine and the specificity of the criteria for tension-type headache.

scholarly journals Mixed Migraine and Tension-type: A Common Cause of Recurrent Headache in Children

2004 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shashi S. Seshia
Keyword(s):  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Private Practice ◽  
Tension Type Headache ◽  
Recurrent Headache ◽  
Or Practice ◽  
Neurology Clinic ◽  
Headache Type ◽  
Canadian City ◽  
Pediatric Neurologist ◽  
Type Headache

Objective:Determine relative frequency of recurrent headache (HA) types in children and adolescents referred to a pediatric neurologist. Methods and subjects: Study design: Prospective, sequential, and observational. Setting: Private practice Pediatric Neurology Clinic in a Canadian city (Winnipeg). Patients and data collection: Information on those referred with HA between September 1998 and December 2001 was entered on data sheets. Patients were followed up for one month to four years.Results:Three hundred and twenty (69%) of 463 referred with HAhad recurrent HA. There were 172 males (54%) and 148 (46%) females. Their ages ranged from two years to 19 years (median: 11 years). They had had their HA disorder for one month to 14 years (median: two years) prior to assessment. Migraine was the main HA type in 124 (38%), tension-type headache (TTH) in 57 (18%) and mixed migraine and TTH in 101 (32%). Thus, 101 (45%) of 225 with migraine as one HAtype also had TTH.Conclusion:Tension-type headache and migraine frequently co-exist and may represent a distinct headache type, at least in children; the association will likely influence response of affected children and adolescents to specific migraine treatments in clinical trials or practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document