Identifying and Quantifying Rates of State Motor Fuel Tax Evasion

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Stephen J. Baluch

The development of the FHWA fuel tax compliance program is described, and estimates of additional motor fuel tax revenues generated by enforcement programs are presented. Substantial revenue losses caused by motor fuel tax evasion schemes were discovered in the mid-1980s. Since 1986, the Internal Revenue Service and FHWA have worked cooperatively to reduce fuel tax evasion by supporting changes in tax collection procedures and additional enforcement resources. Since fiscal year 1990, FHWA has provided funding to supplement state and IRS fuel tax enforcement resources under the auspices of the Joint Federal/State Motor Fuel Tax Compliance Project (joint project). The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 provided $5 million annually through 1997 for the joint project. Enforcement activities directly contribute hundreds of millions of dollars to the Highway Trust Fund (HTF) and state transportation funds, a yield estimated at $10 to $18 per dollar spent on these programs. Furthermore, the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 moved the incidence of the federal excise tax on diesel fuel to the point of removal from bulk storage at the terminal and required tax-exempt diesel fuel to be dyed. The HTF revenue from the diesel fuel tax has increased more than $1 billion in the year since these changes went into effect on January 1, 1994, net of the tax rate increases also enacted in 1993. Some $600 million to $700 million of this increase has been estimated to be the result of improved compliance.


Author(s):  
Robert J. Eger ◽  
Deborah A. Knudson ◽  
Justin Marlowe ◽  
Amy Klemm Verbos

During the past several years, state governments across the United States have engaged in a variety of new efforts to curb motor fuels tax evasion. Unlike the income tax, which is typically evaded through a simple reporting error or other manipulation, motor fuels tax evasion often occurs because potential evaders are able to exploit the complexity of the audit, collection, and exemption processes. Estimates of annual revenue losses related to this sort of evasion are substantial, ranging from $1.5 billion to $2.5 billion. In response to these estimates, FHWA and a number of state governments have implemented changes designed to streamline the administration of this often-overlooked but critical revenue source. The potential for evasion that results from the fuel tax exemptions that Wisconsin provides for agricultural "off-road" uses was examined. The investigation began with a statistical analysis of recent tax-exempt fuel consumption and monthly rebate figures for all midwestern states. These results indicate that Wisconsin consumes significantly higher quantities of tax-exempt fuel for off-road agricultural purposes than other midwestern states. A comparative analysis was also conducted of Wisconsin's Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax law and equivalent laws throughout the Midwest. The statistical and comparative results provide statistical and legal-analytical evidence that Wisconsin's current law is vulnerable to evasion. With these findings in mind, policy options to improve the enforcement of Wisconsin's Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax law were developed.


1953 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-156
Author(s):  
ABDEL MONEM FAWZY ◽  
JAMES W. MARTIN
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary J. Capps ◽  
Oscar Franzese ◽  
Mary Beth Lascurain ◽  
Adam Siekmann ◽  
Alan M. Barker

2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Mark J. Cowan

ABSTRACT: The law regarding state taxation in Indian country is one of the last bastions of legal formalism in tax law jurisprudence. The ability of a state to tax in Indian country turns on the legal incidence of the tax: in general, a tax on the tribe or tribal members is not allowed; a tax on nonmembers doing business with the tribes or tribal members is allowed. In a world where legal formalism governs and there is no overarching mechanism for reconciling the competing interests of state and tribal governments, state/tribal tax disputes can quickly become contentious. A recent battle between the state of Idaho and the tribes within its borders over fuel tax revenue exemplifies the truculence of state/tribal tax disputes, but also shows that amicable resolution is possible when the courts take small steps away from legal formalism. This article provides an overview of the tax landscape in Indian country and then analyzes the dispute over the Idaho motor fuel tax and what it reveals about resolving state/tribal tax disputes.


Author(s):  
Brian V. Church ◽  
Pat McGowen ◽  
Craig Abernathy
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Pavel Semerád

This paper deals with analysis of current problems in the motor fuel market. It analyzes bottlenecks in setting the legislative changes in value added tax, excise tax and the legislation concerning fuels. The biggest problem is tax evasions that favor one group of business entities at the expense of another, and also cause that the state loses revenues mainly from indirect taxes. Therefore, attention is directed to quality control of fuels as a means of consumer protection and prevention of tax evasion and ways to combat tax evasion in import, distribution and storage of mineral oils. The examples are the most common errors found in fraudulent companies. Based on the data collected the possible ultimate evasion was estimated. Therefore, I propose that value added tax law should be amended and some other measures to improve supervision by public authorities like tax authorities and customs administration offices should be taken.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary J Capps ◽  
Mary Beth Lascurain ◽  
Oscar Franzese ◽  
Dennis Duncan Earl ◽  
David L West ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document