scholarly journals Reliability Analysis of a Deep Excavation Problem

Author(s):  
Amit Srivastava
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 198-217
Author(s):  
Mahnoush Gharehdaghi ◽  
Hesam S. Tehrani ◽  
Ali Fakher

Background: The construction and stabilization of deep excavations are associated with several uncertainties due to heterogeneous geological conditions. Therefore, the conventional methods of slope stability analysis do not provide reasonable results. Aim: Hence, it is logical to perform reliability analysis and also risk assessment to make a wiser decision under uncertainty for choosing the proper stabilization method of slopes. Methods: In this regard, a real case study, a 50-meter-deep abandoned open-pit mine, is considered. In the past, the studied deep excavation was located in a rural area, away from the important structures. However, due to the development of the city, the open-pit mine is now located in the city. Furthermore, the Kan River is located on the eastern side of the excavation. Deterministic analysis showed that that Factor of Safety is not sufficient for permanent condition; thus, the deep excavation may have destructive impacts on the adjacent structures and infrastructures by putting them in danger in the case of failure. Results: These circumstances resulted in using reliability analysis and risk assessment using non-deterministic approach. Random Set Finite Element Method (RS-FEM), a non-probabilistic method, is used in determining how much the slope is reliable. The upper and lower bounds of probability of excessive displacement and probability of failure are obtained using RS-FEM by Plaxis2D software. Afterward, HAZUS is successfully used to quantify the economic risk of different stabilization alternatives by defining various scenarios in order to consider the consequences of excavation failure on adjacent utilities and infrastructures. Conclusion: The best alternative is defined as the stabilization method with the lowest economic risk. As a result, it is noticeable that this paper provides a comprehensive methodology for decision making, based on reliability analysis and risk assessment, in stabilizing slopes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-14
Author(s):  
Arefeh Arabaninezhad ◽  
Ali Fakher

Deep excavations in urban areas impose deformation to adjacent structures; hence the reliability of deformation analysis for the real deep excavation projects is very important to be assessed. In this study a framework is presented for the use of reliability methods in deformation analysis of deep urban excavations. The suggested framework is applied for 5 real deep excavation projects implemented during last 10 years. All studied cases were recognized as projects of high importance in urban areas, and were monitored during the excavation process. A non-probabilistic reliability analysis procedure, Random set method, in combination with finite element numerical modeling is applied to obtain the probability of unsatisfactory performance for each case. The reliability analysis results are confirmed by field observations and measurements. Typical results for the probability of analytical deformations exceeding the acceptable values along with the site observations and measured displacements for 5 real deep excavation projects show that the reliability analysis could be a beneficial tool for designer. It is concluded that applying the suggested framework in the design stage of deep excavation projects may lead to design more appropriate systems compared to common deterministic design methods.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianhua Liu ◽  
Shaoming Wu ◽  
Linfeng Wang ◽  
Xiaohan Zhou

The instability failure of many deep excavations supported by diaphragm walls (retaining piles) and horizontal struts is caused by the local failure of struts and the following large area chain effect. The lack of redundancy of struts is an important reason for the overall failure of supporting structures. In this paper, based on an actual excavation project, the numerical calculation model is established by Flac3D5.0, and the reliability of the supporting structure is analyzed based on the redundancy theory. The main conclusions are as follows: the redundancy of single support is large, and strut (6) (close to the middle of the excavation) is the most important. The redundancy is reduced due to continuous failure, and the redundancy is only 3.50 when strut (1)–(7) are all failed (half of the struts). The second row of the struts has the smallest redundancy, while the third row has the biggest redundancy.


ce/papers ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 463-468
Author(s):  
Özgen KÖKTEN ◽  
Ersan YILDIZ

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Laurids Boring ◽  
Johanna Oxstrand ◽  
Michael Hildebrandt

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document