scholarly journals Mobile Node Identifier Option for Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6)

Author(s):  
A. Patel ◽  
K. Leung ◽  
M. Khalil ◽  
H. Akhtar ◽  
K. Chowdhury
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Peer Azmat Shah ◽  
Halabi B. Hasbullah ◽  
Ibrahim A. Lawal ◽  
Abubakar Aminu Mu’azu ◽  
Low Tang Jung

Due to the proliferation of handheld mobile devices, multimedia applications like Voice over IP (VoIP), video conferencing, network music, and online gaming are gaining popularity in recent years. These applications are well known to be delay sensitive and resource demanding. The mobility of mobile devices, running these applications, across different networks causes delay and service disruption. Mobile IPv6 was proposed to provide mobility support to IPv6-based mobile nodes for continuous communication when they roam across different networks. However, the Route Optimization procedure in Mobile IPv6 involves the verification of mobile node’s reachability at the home address and at the care-of address (home test and care-of test) that results in higher handover delays and signalling overhead. This paper presents an enhanced procedure, time-based one-time password Route Optimization (TOTP-RO), for Mobile IPv6 Route Optimization that uses the concepts of shared secret Token, time based one-time password (TOTP) along with verification of the mobile node via direct communication and maintaining the status of correspondent node’s compatibility. The TOTP-RO was implemented in network simulator (NS-2) and an analytical analysis was also made. Analysis showed that TOTP-RO has lower handover delays, packet loss, and signalling overhead with an increased level of security as compared to the standard Mobile IPv6’s Return-Routability-based Route Optimization (RR-RO).


Author(s):  
Tayo Arulogun ◽  
Ahmad AlSa'deh ◽  
Christoph Meinel

Mobile Internet Protocol (MIP) enables a mobile node to be recognized via a single IP address while the node moves between different networks. MIP attains the connectivity to nodes everywhere without user intervention. One general improvement in Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) compared to MIPv4 is the enhanced security. However, there are areas still susceptible to various kinds of attacks. Security approaches for the MIPv6 are still in progress and there are few unsolved concerns and problems. This chapter focuses on MIPv6 security considerations, potential threats, and possible defense mechanisms. The authors discuss and analyze in detail the MIPv6 mobility management and security approaches with respect to the efficiency and complexity and bring forward some constructive recommendations.


Author(s):  
Omar Raoof ◽  
Hamed Al-Raweshidy

This chapter proposes a novel game-based green interface/network selection mechanism that is an extension to the multi-interface fast-handover mobile IPv6 protocol and works when the mobile node has more than one wireless interface. The mechanism controls the handover decision process by deciding whether a handover is needed or not and helps the node to choose the right access point at the right time. Additionally, the mechanism switches the mobile nodes interfaces “ON” and “OFF” when needed to control the mobile node’s energy consumption and improves the handover latency.


Author(s):  
Jani Puttonen ◽  
Ari Viinikainen ◽  
Miska Sulander ◽  
Timo Hamalainen

Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) has been standardized for mobility management in the IPv6 network. When a mobile node changes its point of attachment in the IPv6 network, it experiences a time due MIPv6 procedures when it cannot receive or send any packets. This time called the handover delay might also cause packet loss resulting undesired quality-of-service degradation for various types of applications. The minimization of this delay is especially important for real-time applications. In this chapter we present a fast handover method called the flow-based fast handover for Mobile IPv6 (FFHMIPv6) to speed up the MIPv6 handover processes. FFHMIPv6 employs flow information and IPv6-in-IPv6 tunneling for the fast redirection of the flows during the MIPv6 handover. Also, FFHMIPv6 employs a temporary hand-off-address to minimize the upstream connectivity. We present the performance results comparing the FFHMIPv6 method to other fundamental handover methods with Network Simulator 2 (ns-2) and Mobile IPv6 for Linux (MIPL) network.


Author(s):  
Hewei Yu ◽  
Ziliang Li

This article proposes an enhanced handover scheme of Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) which can avoid duplication authentication. In traditional handover scheme, a Mobile Node (MN) needs an authentication procedure by AAA (Authentication, Authorization and Accounting) server while it enters a PMIPv6 domain. However, when an MN moves to a new subnet in the same domain, it still needs another authentication procedure, which would increase handover latency. In the proposed scheme, an MN only needs to be authenticated once while it enters a PMIPv6 domain, and a Mobile Access Gateway (MAG) that an MN is attached to will send the authentication information to the New MAG (NMAG) which MN will access to before the MN's handover. So that MN can skip the second authentication. The authors build a test-bed and have done some tests. Result shows that this scheme has got improvement in decreasing handover latency.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Perkins ◽  
V. Devarapalli
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Dao Van Thanh ◽  
Nguyen Van Tam ◽  
Vu Duy Loi

Mobile Ipv6 (MIPv6) is designed to support IP mobility management in the Internet. The fast handovef fof Mobile Ipv6 (FMIPv6) is an extension of Mobile Ipv6. Because FMIPv6 provides the information for layer 2 (L2) handover in advance, the layer 3 handover procedure could start early in order to reduce the handover latency. However, the handover latency of FMIPv6 is still remaining large which is hardly to meet the requirements of real-time applications. To deal with this, we propose a modified fast handover scheme named as Improvement FMIPv6 (called I-FMIPv6) to reduce the overall latency on handover. In I-FMIPv6, when the Mobile Node (MN) receives a Fast Binding Acknowledgment (FBAck) message with the New Care- of Address (NcoA) acceptance, it will send an Binding Update (BU) message to the Correspondent Nodes (CNs) to update the MN’s new CoA before the 1.2 handover occurs. Thus, -FMIPv6 con void circle routing, wrong order and handover latency can be reduces up to 16.79%, the average throughput measured since MN lost connection to Previous Acces Router (PAR) till getting stable connection to New Access Router (NAR) can be increases up to 2.57% compared with FMIPv6 at the speed of the moving vehicles in the inner city.


2014 ◽  
Vol 519-520 ◽  
pp. 142-145
Author(s):  
Jin Shan Sun ◽  
Ying You Wen ◽  
Yu Hui Liu ◽  
Hong Zhao

Delay and packet loss caused by the basic mobile IPv6 handover protocol can not guarantee the service quality of real-time communication. In order to improve the performance of fast handover of the mobile IPv6, we proposed a fast handover scheme based on hierarchical mobility which combines micro mobility and the link layer trigger. By shielding local mobility of the mobile node, the scheme can greatly reduce the signaling information traffic from mobile node to HA and CN. Through the link layer trigger mechanism, the scheme builds a tunnel in advance to avoid packet loss. In order to verify the performance of the proposed scheme, we did some simulation experiments in the NS-2 environment. The simulation results show that the scheme reduces handover delay and packet loss effectively.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-26
Author(s):  
Iqsyahiro Kresna ◽  
Yoso Adi Setyoko ◽  
Aditya Wijayanto

VANET (Vehicular Ad-Hoc Network) adalah bentuk khusus dari MANET (Mobile Ad-Hoc Network). VANET (Vehicular Ad-Hoc Network) adalah jaringan yang terdiri dari kumpulan node mobile nirkabel yang berkomunikasi satu sama lain tanpa infrastruktur yang tetap. Pergerakan MN (Mobile Node) pada VANET sangat tinggi dan menyebabkan IP Address pada MN sering berubah. Berdasarkan kondisi jaringan yang berubah, koneksi yang terjadi antara MN menjadi terganggu dan terputus selama beberapa detik. Selain itu, menyebabkan delay yang besar dan throughput yang lebih kecil dengan paket loss tinggi jika di suatu daerah jumlah MN meningkat secara signifikan. Dalam simulasi ini diukur kinerja antara jaringan Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) dan Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) menggunakan agen transport UDP dengan beberapa ukuran paket data CBR. Berdasarkan parameter utama dalam menentukan kualitas jaringan, akan dibandingkan dan diperoleh nilai dari handover latensi, dengan mengukur packet loss, throughput, dan delay. Berdasarkan hasil studi literatur, dapat disimpulkan bahwa kinerja jaringan HMIPv6 lebih baik daripada MIPv6 karena HMIPv6 memiliki paket loss dan delay yang lebih kecil dan throughput yang lebih besar dibandingkan dengan MIPv6.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document