Growth Decomposition of Indian Economy, 1981-2007

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nitin Navin
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Growth Model ◽  
Economic Performance ◽  
Productivity Growth ◽  
Growth Accounting ◽  
Indian Economy ◽  
Solow Growth Model ◽  
Proximate Explanation ◽  
Factor Accumulation

The present paper attempts to evaluate the economic performance of India for the period of 1981-2007, using the conventional growth accounting technique, also known as “Solow growth model”. In particular, it examines the relative contributions of factor accumulation and productivity growth in the economic growth of the economy. The main objective is to check if the growth is sustainable. Also, an attempt is made to find the proximate explanation of any major ups and downs that happened in the economy during this period. The paper concludes by arguing that the recent spectacular performance of the Indian economy is mainly fuelled by improvement in TFP.

Economic Performance Under Labour

2010 ◽  
Vol 212 ◽  
pp. R2-R14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iana Liadze ◽  
Martin Weale
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Labour Market ◽  
Economic Performance ◽  
Productivity Growth ◽  
Market Performance ◽  
National Income ◽  
The Other ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Sustainable Economic Growth ◽  
Growth Economic

This article compares the performance of the UK economy since 1997 with that between 1979 and 1997 and with the performance of the other G7 economies in both periods. It concludes that Britain has done relatively well in terms of productivity growth, economic growth and national income per head but not very well in terms of labour market performance. Savings rates were too low to deliver sustainable economic growth over the period 1979–97 and there has been very little improvement since then. The performance of the economy during the recession and its immediate aftermath has been disappointing relative to the other G7 economies.

Development as economic growth, 1956–

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Toye
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Developing Countries ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Growth Model ◽  
Technical Change ◽  
Growth Accounting ◽  
Economic Sectors ◽  
Productivity Differentials ◽  
Factor Inputs ◽  
Related Technique

Economists often conflate the theory of economic development with the theory of economic growth. This practice has become increasingly popular since Robert Solow made elegant improvements to the Harrod–Domar growth model, but left it unclear whether it was meant to be applicable in developing countries. Solow’s model has one sector only and aggregates growth as increased GNP. It has no place for changes in the balance between economic sectors that characterize development. A related technique is growth accounting, which disaggregates growth into amounts generated by capital and labour inputs, and a residual attributed to technical change and all other influences on growth. The finding that the residual outweighs the effect of factor inputs is subject to measurement problems, and ignores the question of large productivity differentials between sectors.

Globalization, role of institutions and economic performance in Indian economy

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhu Sehrawat ◽  
A.K. Giri
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Economic Performance ◽  
Time Series Data ◽  
Empirical Support ◽  
Institutional Quality ◽  
Series Data ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Indian Economy ◽  
Integration Test ◽  
Short Run

PurposeUsing time series data for the period 1982-2016, this study aims to explore the effect of globalization, institutional quality on economic performance for Indian economy by endogenizing financial development.Design/methodology/approachThe stationarity properties of the variables are tested by Saikkonen and Lütkepohl unit root test, and the co-integration test proposed by Bayer–Hanck (2013) is used to check the long- and short-run relationship among the variables. The robustness is established by autoregressive distributed lag approach (ARDL), and the Granger causality test is used to assess the causal relationship among the variables.FindingsThe empirical findings indicate the existence of the co-integrating relationship among the variables, and the ARDL estimates reveal that both globalization and institutional quality act as important key drivers for India’s economic performance. However, the institutional quality does not affect the short-run economic growth.Research limitations/implicationsThe study finds that institutional quality and globalization index are crucial to accelerate economic performance. Therefore, policy efforts should be focused on the improvement of these indicators by offering protection of property rights, reduction in government corruption, reducing political instability, price stability and stable macroeconomic environment. This study recommends that policy should be geared toward development of financial sector, promotion of financial integration, which will create the environment for the efficient allocation of credit.Originality/valueThis study provides empirical support for the proposition that both globalization and institutional quality matter for India’s emerging economic growth by taking account of the structural break.

scholarly journals Myths and Realities of Long-run Development: A Look at Deeper Determinants

2007 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lubna Hassan
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Economic Performance ◽  
Technological Development ◽  
Geographical Factors ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Primary Determinant ◽  
Proximate Causes ◽  
Determinants Of Economic Growth ◽  
Factor Accumulation

It has long been realised that factor accumulation and technological development are only proximate causes of economic development, and the focus has now shifted to investigating the ‘deeper determinants’ of economic growth. Two such forces are highlighted in the literature: institutions and geography. However, it remains controversial as to which of these two is the more important. The “institutions school” assigns primal importance to institutions, whereas the “geography school” considers geographical factors as the primary determinant of the economic performance of countries. This paper reviews the debate surrounding these “deeper determinants” of economic performance. It reviews the work of these two schools of thought and their interpretation of the long-run development. The paper then examines the evidence provided by the respective schools in favour of their hypotheses. It concludes in favour of the Institutions hypothesis as the Geography school does not provide a consistent story of long-run development.

scholarly journals Factor accumulation and economic growth in Pakistan: incorporating human capital

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 480-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kashif Munir ◽  
Shahzad Arshad
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Developing Countries ◽  
Human Capital ◽  
Endogenous Growth ◽  
Growth Model ◽  
Physical Capital ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Endogenous Growth Model ◽  
Factor Accumulation

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the long-run and short-run relationship between factor accumulation (i.e. physical capital and human capital) and economic growth by calculating the stocks of human capital and real physical capital. Design/methodology/approach The study uses endogenous growth model, where GDP per worker is the dependent variable and factor accumulation (real physical capital per worker and human capital) is the explanatory variable under the autoregressive distributive lag framework from 1973 to 2014 for Pakistan. Findings The results suggest that there is a long-run relationship between factor accumulation and GDP per worker in Pakistan. Findings of the study are consistent with the endogenous growth model suggesting that accumulation of human capital increases labor productivity, employment level and per capita income, and causes economic growth. Practical implications Developing countries like Pakistan should increase share of human capital for economic development. Government should invest in the education sector because investment in human capital has a large potential of productivity growth and welfare increase in developing countries. Originality/value This study challenges the notion of human capital and real physical capital stock used by different researchers. Considering human capital as a core factor of production, a series of human capital as average year of schooling is calculated by utilizing the perpetual inventory method.

Productivity

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen N. Broadberry ◽  
Claire Giordano ◽  
Francesco Zollino
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Labor Productivity ◽  
Productivity Growth ◽  
The Other ◽  
Growth Accounting ◽  
Factor Productivity ◽  
International Context ◽  
Labor Productivity Growth ◽  
Catching Up ◽  
Productivity Dynamics

Italy's economic growth over its 150 years of unified history did not occur at a steady pace, nor was it balanced across sectors. Relying on an entirely new input (labor and capital) database, this chapter evaluates the different labor productivity growth trends within the Italian economy's sectors, as well as the contribution of structural change to productivity growth. Italy's performance is then set in an international context: a comparison of sectoral labor productivity growth rates and levels within a selected sample of countries (United Kingdom, United States, Germany, Japan, India) allows us to better time, quantify, and gauge the causes of Italy's catching-up process and subsequent more recent slowdown. Finally, the paper analyzes the proximate sources of Italy's growth, relative to the other countries, in a standard growth accounting framework, in an attempt also to disentangle the contribution of both total factor productivity growth and capital deepening to the country's labor productivity dynamics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document