Editorial

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Prof. K. V. Bhanu Murthy

It gives me immense pleasure to bring to you another issue of Pragati. The current volume consists of six papers, a commentary and a book review. The paper on ‘The Interest Rate Channel of Monetary Transmission -The Indian experience’ by Suvojit Lahiri Chakravarty, examines the effect of the changes in the policy rate on the different segments of the financial market in India from the onset of LAF i.e., July 2000 onwards to March 2014. A VAR model comprising of interest rate, output, price and exchange rate is estimated for the same period, to study the effect of changes in the policy rate on the various macroeconomic variables. A paper on ‘Regional Pattern and Determinants of Knowledge-based Industry: Evidences from Firm-level Data of Indian Pharmaceutical Industry’ has been contributed by Tareef Husain. The empirical findings based on negative binomial regression model reveal that the group of regional factors such as, size of industry, availability of skilled labour, number of science and technology (S&T) institutions and number of patent applications attract higher number of pharmaceutical firms in respective states. There has been a shift in the regional pattern with the share of Western India declining in favour of North India. ‘Poverty Line: A Definitional Progress in India’ by Deepti Kakar, reveals that in India poverty had been traditionally looked at as insufficiency to attain subsistence and all the attempts at poverty line definitions were anchored to the Food Energy Intake method. More recently, the recommendations by the Tendulkar Committee and Rangarajan Expert Group include a shift away from the calorie norms to the cost of basic needs method which looks at basic requirements of food and non-food items. Two of the papers in this issue look at India’s growth story. The paper on ‘A Study of Trends in India’s Economic Growth since 1951: The Inclusive Growth Approach’ by Arjun. Y. Pangannavar, focuses on the saga of India’s economic growth under the ‘Nehru-Mahalanobis Economic Growth Model’ (NMEGM) and ‘Narsimhrao-Manmohan Singh Economic Growth Model’ (NMSEGM). This paper attempts to assess the growth rate trends of Indian economy by using the measuring tool called ‘Inclusive Growth’ to get a fair and true picture. Another article on ‘Inclusive Growth for Social Justice: An Imperative for India’s Development Efforts’ by Niti Bhasin argues that inclusive growth is the new paradigm that is related essentially to equality and opportunity to all for achieving a productive and meaningful life with freedom, equality and dignity. There is a lot of talk on growth with equity but it has not been dovetailed with the development effort. An immediate plan for achieving equitable development is needed and the challenge before the Government is to evolve a system in which reforms and globalisation can proceed on one track, and the poor can be protected from the ill effects of it, on the other. Local communities and markets should be reinforced to take advantage of finance, trade and investment changes flowing from the national and global levels. Investing to improve productivity in agriculture is essential for sustainable poverty reduction. In essence, therefore, there has to successful localization first to reap the benefits of globalisation.

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arjun. Y. Pangannavar

This paper focuses on the saga of India’s economic growth under the ‘Nehru-Mahalanobis Economic Growth Model’ (NMEGM) and ‘Narsimhrao-Manmohan Singh Economic Growth Model’ (NMSEGM). The NMEGM continued till 1990 unceasingly; Indira Gandhi’s social control had supported the model to place India’s economic growth at a high level. After becoming a member of World trade Organization (WTO), India entered the epoch of world new economic order and initiated new economic reforms. It followed globalisation, liberalisation and privatisation policies to achieve double digit economic growth rate. This model is popularly known as ‘Narsimhrao-Manmohan Singh Economic Growth Model’. Based on past trends and new changes, this paper attempts to assess the impact of NMSEGM on future economic growth. India has practiced both endogenous and exogenous models of economic growth. The endogenous model was in operation from 1956-57 till 1990-91 that placed economic growth rate at more than 5%. However, from 1990-91, the new economic reforms have followed the exogenous model that has raised economic growth rate to nearing double-digit; but, the decadal economic growth rate has shown a declining trend. This paper attempts to assess the growth rate trends of Indian economy by using the measuring tool called ‘Inclusive Growth’ to get a fair and true picture.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramona Ioana Oprea ◽  
Pater Flavius ◽  
Adina Juratoni ◽  
Olivia Bundau

2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Wei-Bin Zhang

This paper proposes a one-sector multigroup growth model with endogenous labor supply in discrete time. Proposing an alternative approach to behavior of households, we examine the dynamics of wealth and income distribution in a competitive economy with capital accumulation as the main engine of economic growth. We show how human capital levels, preferences, and labor force of heterogeneous households determine the national economic growth, wealth, and income distribution and time allocation of the groups. By simulation we demonstrate, for instance, that in the three-group economy when the rich group's human capital is improved, all the groups will economically benefit, and the leisure times of all the groups are reduced but when any other group's human capital is improved, the group will economically benefit, the other two groups economically lose, and the leisure times of all the groups are increased.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Bianca ◽  
Massimiliano Ferrara ◽  
Luca Guerrini

A further generalization of an economic growth model is the main topic of this paper. The paper specifically analyzes the effects on the asymptotic dynamics of the Solow model when two time delays are inserted: the time employed in order that the capital is used for production and the necessary time so that the capital is depreciated. The existence of a unique nontrivial positive steady state of the generalized model is proved and sufficient conditions for the asymptotic stability are established. Moreover, the existence of a Hopf bifurcation is proved and, by using the normal form theory and center manifold argument, the explicit formulas which determine the stability, direction, and period of bifurcating periodic solutions are obtained. Finally, numerical simulations are performed for supporting the analytical results.


Filomat ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 515-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miodrag Mateljevic ◽  
Marek Svetlik ◽  
Miloljub Albijanic ◽  
Nebojsa Savic

In this paper we give a generalization of the Lagrange mean value theorem via lower and upper derivative, as well as appropriate criteria of monotonicity and convexity for arbitrary function f : (a, b) ( R. Some applications to the neoclassical economic growth model are given (from mathematical point of view).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document