scholarly journals Doses to Organs at Risk Calculated Using Plato and Oncentra Softwares in Intracavitary Brachytherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (01) ◽  
pp. 117-126
Author(s):  
NOR HAFIZAH ABDULLAH ◽  
REDUAN ABDULLAH ◽  
MAZURAWATI MOHAMAD ◽  
AHMAD ZAKARIA ◽  
CHIANG CHEN SUK
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Intracavitary Brachytherapy ◽  
Planning Systems ◽  
Organ Doses ◽  
Independent Verification ◽  
Treatment Planning Systems ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

This is a retrospective study, the organ doses to the bladder and rectum were compared between Nucletron PLATO V14.2.3 (BV) and newer version software Oncentra MasterPlan V4.3 (OMP) treatment planning systems (TPS). The treatment data of 32 intracavitary brachytherapy patients at Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia from January 2010 to June 2015 were used. These data sets were used for catheter reconstruction for both PLATO and OMP TPS followed by independent verification using Excel. There is no significant difference in mean doses to organs at risk (OARs) that calculated by both TPS (p>0.05). The mean percentage of doses calculated by PLATO TPS for bladder and rectum were 66.58 ± 27.42 % and 46.27 ± 14.47 % respectively. While the mean percentage of doses for bladder and rectum calculated by OMP TPS were 65.68 ± 24.24 % and 46.46 ± 16.66 respectively. The mean percentage difference in doses comparison between independent verification calculation and PLATO TPS was 1.96 ± 6.00% and then became 6.37 ± 5.17% when it was compared with OMP TPS. Overall, the dose calculation differences for both versions of TPS were within the range recommended by Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The dose calculations of the two treatment planning systems showed good agreement and both could be used in planning intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Whereas Excel based independent verification suitable to be implemented as routine dose verification programme prior to treatment delivery.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Volumetric Doses of Organs at Risk in Carcinoma Cervix Patients with HDR Intracavitary Brachytherapy and Comparison of CTbased and Conventional Plans

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Srivastava ◽  
N K Painuly ◽  
S P Mishra ◽  
K Srivastava ◽  
N Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Dose Assessment ◽  
Intracavitary Brachytherapy ◽  
Cervix Carcinoma ◽  
Carcinoma Cervix ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
True Representation

Background: Brachytherapy treatment planning in cervix carcinoma patients using two dimensional (2D) orthogonal images provides only point dose estimates while CT-based planning provides volumetric dose assessment helping in understanding the correlation between morbidity and the dose to organs at risk (OARs) and treatment volume.Objective: Aim of present study is to compare International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report 38 (ICRU 38) reference point doses to OARs with volumetric doses using 2D images and CT images in patients with cervical cancer.Material and Methods: In this prospective study, 20 patients with cervical cancer stages (IIB-IIIB) were planned for a brachytherapy dose of 7Gy per fraction for three fractions using 2D image-based treatment plan and CT-based plan. ICRU 38 points for bladder and rectum were identified on both 2D image-based plan and CT-based plan and doses (DICRU) at these points were compared to the minimum dose to 2cc volume (D2cc) of bladder and rectum receiving the highest dose.Results: D2cc bladder dose was 1.60 (±0.67) times more than DICRUb bladder dose whereas D2cc rectum dose was 1.13±0.40 times DICRUr. Significant difference was found between DICRUb and D2cc dose for bladder (p=.0.016) while no significant difference was seen between DICRUr and D2cc dose for rectum (p=0.964).Conclusion: The study suggests that ICRU 38 point doses are not the true representation of maximum doses to OARs. CT-based treatment planning is more a reliable tool for OAR dose assessment than the conventional 2D radiograph-based plan.

Comparison of image-based three-dimensional treatment planning using AcurosTM BV and AAPM TG-43 algorithm for intracavitary brachytherapy of carcinoma cervix

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 254-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mourougan Sinnatamby ◽  
Vivekanandan Nagarajan ◽  
K S. Reddy ◽  
Gunaseelan Karunanidhi ◽  
Vivekanandam Singhavajala
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Tumour Volume ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Intracavitary Brachytherapy ◽  
Carcinoma Cervix ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

AbstractAimTo compare the image-based three-dimensional treatment planning using AcurosTM BV and AAPM TG-43 algorithm for intracavitary brachytherapy of carcinoma cervix.Materials and methodsTwenty-seven patients with cancer cervix, stage IIB or IIIB with vaginal involvement limited to the upper third of the vagina was included into the study. Intracavitary treatments with the patient in this study done with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging compatible ring applicator. Groupe European de Curietherapie and European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology recommended doses to target volumes and organs at risk compared using dose volume histogram.ResultsThe mean value of Point ‘A’ dose was compared between AcurosTM BV and TG-43, which indicates 0·13% difference. The differences in the mean dose to gross tumour volume for various volumes are V100% 0·28%, V150% 1·22% and V200% 1·03%; all volumes showed small difference but statistical significant (p<0·05). The mean dose of high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV) D90 using AcurosTM BV was 8·47 Gy, which was 1·63% less compared with TG-43. The mean point A dose using AcurosTM BV is 1·04 times the dose to D90 of mean HRCTV. The same difference was observed in comparison with TG43. D2cc and D0·1cc of the bladder, rectum and sigmoid showed a statistically significant difference (p<0·05) in comparison with TG-43.ConclusionThe differences in dosimetric parameters between the AcurosTM BV and TG-43 proved to be statistically significant. The difference is very small, and they are clinically insignificant.

A comparison of dose distributions of HDR intracavitary brachytherapy using different sources and treatment planning systems

2009 ◽  
Vol 67 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 1426-1431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-wook Park ◽  
Young Seok Kim ◽  
Sung Ho Park ◽  
Eun Kyung Choi ◽  
Seung Do Ahn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Intracavitary Brachytherapy ◽  
Planning Systems ◽  
Dose Distributions ◽  
Treatment Planning Systems ◽  
Different Sources

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Conventional Planning and MRI Based Volume Optimized Planning of Intracavitary Brachytherapy of Cervical Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (50) ◽  
pp. 3061-3066
Author(s):  
Niharika Darasani
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Large Volume ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Intracavitary Brachytherapy ◽  
Target Coverage ◽  
Cancer Cervix ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
The Mean

BACKGROUND Cervical cancer is one of the commonest malignancies among women in India. The main stay of treatment is the combination of External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) and Intracavitary Brachytherapy (ICBT) in these patients. We compared conventional point A based treatment planning and MRI based volume optimized planning in ICBT of cervical carcinoma along with doses to organs at risk in both plans. We also compared the radiation doses to organs at risk in both the plans by International Committee on Radiation Units (ICRU) recommended points and dose volume histograms. METHODS Eighteen Patients with cancer cervix (72.22% with stage IIB) received EBRT on linear accelerator by four field technique using 15 MV energy for a dose of 46 Gray (Gy) – 50 Gy in 23-25 fractions 2.0 Gy per fraction, five days per week, for 5 weeks to whole pelvis. Most of the patients received at least three doses of chemotherapy. A total of 50 high-dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT) applications done in 18 patients were used for analysis in the study. Clinical history, gynaecology examination and punch biopsy were undertaken. The patients were assessed during EBRT after 2 weeks, for ICBT application and suitable patients were selected for the procedure. CT based point A planning and MRI based volume optimised planning were done for each ICBT application before intracavity brachytherapy. Contouring of rectum, bladder, right and left femoral heads, and small bowel were done. RESULTS The median age of patients in this study was 50.4 ± 03.25 years. 72.22% (13/18) of the patients were of stage IIB. The mean dose delivered to 90% high-risk clinical target volume (D90- HR-CTV) for all 50 applications by volume optimized planning was 06.87 ± 0.942 Gy. The mean D90-HR-CTV by point A based conventional planning was 13.69 ± 1.06 GY. The mean D100-HR-CTV by volume optimized planning was 05.30 Gy (± 0.20). The mean D100-HR-CTV by point A based conventional planning was 08.91 ± 0.74 Gy. Maximum doses in the bladder and rectum were significantly lower (p<0.05) for MRI planning than for the conventional approach (06.49 GY Vs. 07.45 GY) for bladder; (04.57 GY vs. 05.06 GY) for rectum respectively. Both bladder (D2cc) and rectum (D2cc) doses could be reduced significantly by volume optimization. CONCLUSIONS D90-HR-CTV adequately covered by MRI based volume optimized planning was superior to conventional point A based planning in terms of both conformity of target coverage and evaluation of Organ at Risk (OARs), including the rectum and bladder. Both bladder and rectum doses in the most irradiated 2cc volume are significantly reduced in volume optimized planning. Hence, volume optimized planning would be more beneficial in large volume diseases to get better target coverage at the same time sparing the organs in small volume diseases. Hence, the use of MRI-based volume optimization brachytherapy for patients with large volume tumours with parametrial invasion is beneficial. KEYWORDS Cancer, Cervix, Woman, Radiotherapy, Brachytherapy, EBRT, ICBT, Prognosis

Comparative dosimetry of brachytherapy treatment planning between a volume-based plan by CT and a point-based plan by TAUS in CT datasets for brachytherapy

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Chaiyaporn Pintakham ◽  
Ekkasit Tharavichitkul ◽  
Somsak Wanwilairat ◽  
Wannapha Nobnop
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Sigmoid Colon ◽  
Clinical Target Volume ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Reference Points ◽  
Uterine Perforation ◽  
Target Dose ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Aim: To evaluate comparative dosimetry of brachytherapy treatment planning between a volume-based plan by computed tomography (CT) and a point-based plan by transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) in CT datasets for brachytherapy. Materials and methods: From 2019 to 2021, 59 different datasets of CT images were collected from 38 patients treated by intracavitary brachytherapy with tandem ovoid or tandem ring applicators. At that time, TAUS was performed to prevent uterine perforation and to evaluate topography of the cervix during application. In volume-based planning by CT, the target dose was used to keep the dose at 90% of high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), to give a dose of at least 7Gy, while in the point-based plan by TAUS, the target dose was used to keep the minimum dose to eight cervix reference points (measured by TAUS), to give a dose of at least 7Gy. The doses to targets and organs at risk were evaluated and compared between volume-based planning by CT and the point-based plan by TAUS. Results: Of 59 fractions, a tandem ovoid applicator was used in 48 fractions (81·3%). In the volume-based plan by CT, the mean doses to HR-CTV(D90), intermediate-risk clinical target volume (IR-CTV)(D90), bladder(D2cc), rectum(D2cc) and sigmoid colon(D2cc) were 7·0, 3·9, 4·9, 2·9 and 3·3 Gy, respectively, while in the point-based plan by TAUS, the mean doses to HR-CTV(D90), IR-CTV(D90), bladder(D2cc), rectum(D2cc) and sigmoid colon(D2cc) were 8·2, 4·6, 5·9, 3·4 and 3·9 Gy, respectively. The percentages of mean dose differences between TAUS and CT of HR-CTV(D90), IR-CTV(D90), bladder(D2cc), rectum(D2cc) and sigmoid colon(D2cc) were 17·7, 19·5, 20·5, 19·5, 21·3 and 19·8%, respectively. With the target dose to the point-based plan by TAUS (7 Gy to the cervix reference points), this was close to D98 of HR-CTV with a mean percentage of difference of 0·6%. Findings: The point-based plan by TAUS showed higher values to targets and organs at risk than the volume-based plan by CT. With the point-based plan by TAUS, it was close to D98 of HR-CTV.

scholarly journals Improving interinstitutional and intertechnology consistency of pulmonary SBRT by dose prescription to the mean internal target volume dose

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Wilke ◽  
C. Moustakis ◽  
O. Blanck ◽  
D. Albers ◽  
C. Albrecht ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Dose Fractionation ◽  
Internal Target ◽  
Internal Target Volume ◽  
Planning Study ◽  
Dose Distributions ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Purpose Dose, fractionation, normalization and the dose profile inside the target volume vary substantially in pulmonary stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) between different institutions and SBRT technologies. Published planning studies have shown large variations of the mean dose in planning target volume (PTV) and gross tumor volume (GTV) or internal target volume (ITV) when dose prescription is performed to the PTV covering isodose. This planning study investigated whether dose prescription to the mean dose of the ITV improves consistency in pulmonary SBRT dose distributions. Materials and methods This was a multi-institutional planning study by the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) working group Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Radiotherapy. CT images and structures of ITV, PTV and all relevant organs at risk (OAR) for two patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were distributed to all participating institutions. Each institute created a treatment plan with the technique commonly used in the institute for lung SBRT. The specified dose fractionation was 3 × 21.5 Gy normalized to the mean ITV dose. Additional dose objectives for target volumes and OAR were provided. Results In all, 52 plans from 25 institutions were included in this analysis: 8 robotic radiosurgery (RRS), 34 intensity-modulated (MOD), and 10 3D-conformal (3D) radiation therapy plans. The distribution of the mean dose in the PTV did not differ significantly between the two patients (median 56.9 Gy vs 56.6 Gy). There was only a small difference between the techniques, with RRS having the lowest mean PTV dose with a median of 55.9 Gy followed by MOD plans with 56.7 Gy and 3D plans with 57.4 Gy having the highest. For the different organs at risk no significant difference between the techniques could be found. Conclusions This planning study pointed out that multiparameter dose prescription including normalization on the mean ITV dose in combination with detailed objectives for the PTV and ITV achieve consistent dose distributions for peripheral lung tumors in combination with an ITV concept between different delivery techniques and across institutions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document