EPIDEMIOLOGY OF ARMILLARIA ROOT-ROT OF KIWIFRUIT

1992 ◽  
pp. 573-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian J. Homer
Keyword(s):  
Root Rot ◽  
Mycologia ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 777-785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin P. A. Coetzee ◽  
Brenda D. Wingfield ◽  
Teresa A. Coutinho ◽  
Michael J. Wingfield

1990 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 1859-1863 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. I. Mallett

A survey to identify Armillaria root rot pathogens, their host range, and geographic distribution was conducted in the Canadian prairie provinces. Collections of basidiocarps and isolates from the wood of gymptomatic or dead trees were made. Armillaria species were identified by interfertility testing and by the L-DOPA method. Three Armillaria species, A. ostoyae (Romagn.) Herink, A. sinapina Bérubé & Dessureault, and A. calvescens Bérubé & Dessureault, were identified. Armillariaostoyae was the most common species in both the subalpine and boreal forests and was found on a wide variety of coniferous and deciduous host species. Armillariasinapina was in both the boreal and subalpine forests but occurred primarily on deciduous host species. Armillariacalvescens was rare and was found only in the boreal forest on both coniferous and deciduous host species.


2014 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 104-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Pellegrini ◽  
D. Prodorutti ◽  
I. Pertot

Plant Disease ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 483-492
Author(s):  
Matthew G. Cromey ◽  
Jassy Drakulic ◽  
Elizabeth J. Beal ◽  
Ian A. G. Waghorn ◽  
Joe N. Perry ◽  
...  

Armillaria root rot (ARR) is a serious disease of woody plants caused by several species of Armillaria. Armillaria isolates from diagnostic samples received in 2017 were identified by genus- and species-specific PCR and compared with isolates from an earlier survey (2004 to 2007). The results were comparable and, therefore, were combined for further analysis. Three species were identified: Armillaria mellea (83%), A. gallica (15%), and A. ostoyae (2%). Their wide host range makes choice of resistant plants in management of the disease difficult. We used the Royal Horticultural Society diagnostic dataset of ARR records from U.K. gardens to compare the susceptibility of different host genera to the disease. The dataset was compared with an earlier experiment at the University of California. An index-based approach was used to separate genera into three categories: 77 low-index (<0.99), 37 medium-index (0.99 to 1.76), and 56 high-index (>1.76) genera were recorded. All three species were associated with both angiosperms and gymnosperms; moreover, A. ostoyae did not show the host preference for gymnosperms that has been reported elsewhere. A. gallica was particularly common on herbaceous perennials and showed a trend to occur on resistant hosts that may be under other stress, supporting its description as an opportunistic pathogen. Four monocotyledons grown as trees or shrubs in U.K. gardens had a very low ARR index according to indices associated with A. mellea and A. ostoyae. Genera in the order Myrtales were almost always low index, while those in the Saxifragales and Fagales were mostly high index. These results provide confidence in the use of host resistance as part of the integrated management of ARR.


1974 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Hudak ◽  
R. E. Wells

not available


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document