Predicting firm-level volatility in the United States: the role of monetary policy uncertainty

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-177
Author(s):  
Matthew W Clance ◽  
Riza Demirer ◽  
Rangan Gupta ◽  
Clement Kweku Kyei

Theoretically, there is exists a strong link between monetary policy rate uncertainty and equity return volatility, since asset pricing models assume the risk-free rate to be a key factor for equity prices. Most studies, however, focus on aggregate volatility proxies, ignoring the evidence that idiosyncratic risk could also be an important consideration, particularly for under-diversified investors and arbitrageurs. Given this, we examine firm-level annual data for the United States over 1997 to 2016, and show that monetary policy uncertainty does indeed contain significant predictive information over realized and implied volatilities at both the firm- and industry-level. The predictive power of monetary policy uncertainty is found to be robust across the low and high quantiles of volatility with higher policy uncertainty predicting higher firm-level volatility in subsequent periods. While the strongest possible volatility effect is observed in the case of Retail Trade, we observe opposite resuThis paper provides novel evidence for the This paper provides novel evidence for the predictive power of monetary policy uncertainty (MPU) over stock return volatility at the firm level based on a dataset constructed from 9,458 U.S. firms. Our findings show that monetary policy uncertainty contains significant predictive information over realized and implied volatilities at both the firm- and industry-level, with higher policy uncertainty predicting higher volatility in subsequent periods. While the strongest possible volatility effect is observed in the case of Retail Trade, we observe opposite results for Mining with high policy uncertainty predicting lower volatility in this sector. We argue that the dual nature of the underlying commodity for Mining companies, both as a consumption and investment asset, drives the negative effect of policy uncertainty on volatility in this sector. Nevertheless, the findings highlight the predictive information captured by monetary policy actions on the idiosyncratic component of equity market volatility.predictive power of monetary policy uncertainty (MPU) over stock return volatility at the firm level based on a dataset constructed from 9,458 U.S. firms. Our findings show that monetary policy uncertainty contains significant predictive information over realized and implied volatilities at both the firm- and industry-level, with higher policy uncertainty predicting higher volatility in subsequent periods. While the strongest possible volatility effect is observed in the case of Retail Trade, we observe opposite results for Mining with high policy uncertainty predicting lower volatility in this sector. We argue that the dual nature of the underlying commodity for Mining companies, both as a consumption and investment asset, drives the negative effect of policy uncertainty on volatility in this sector. Nevertheless, the findings highlight the predictive information captured by monetary policy actions on the idiosyncratic component of equity market volatility.lts for Mining with high policy uncertainty predicting lower volatility in this sector. We argue that the dual nature of the underlying commodity for Mining companies, both as a consumption and investment asset, drives the negative effect of policy uncertainty on volatility in this sector. Nevertheless, the findings highlight the predictive information captured by monetary policy actions on the idiosyncratic component of equity market volatility.

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 278-281
Author(s):  
Seyedeh Fatemeh Razmi ◽  
Bahareh Ramezanian Bajgiran ◽  
Seyed Mohammad Javad Razmi ◽  
Kiana Baensaf Oroumieh

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rangan Gupta ◽  
Mark Wohar

Theory suggests a strong link between monetary policy rate uncertainty and equity return volatility, since asset pricing models assume the risk-free rate to be a key factor for equity prices. Given this, our paper uses historical monthly data for the United Kingdom over 1833:01 to 2018:07, to show that monetary policy uncertainty increases stock market volatility within sample. In addition, we show that the information on monetary policy uncertainty also adds value to forecasting out-of-sample equity market volatility. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 503-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaheer Anwer ◽  
Wajahat Azmi ◽  
Shamsher Mohamad Ramadili Mohd

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to appraise the effectiveness of monetary policy actions in variant market conditions for Islamic stocks. These stocks offer ground for a natural experiment as they have restrictions on the line of business and their distinguished capital structure does not allow them to combat the liquidity crisis through the use of leverage. Design/methodology/approach The paper uses the quantile regression approach for a multi-country sample of Islamic stock indices to assess the impact of domestic as well as US expansionary monetary policy on stock returns of Islamic indices at various locations of distribution of returns. Findings It is found that, at lower return levels, an expansionary monetary policy has a negative effect on the returns. In other cases, there is no significant impact of policy rate change on index returns. Research limitations/implications It is more appropriate to use firm level data of Islamic stocks instead of stock indices. However, the information regarding index constituents is not publicly available. Practical implications The paper offers useful information to investors and policy makers. It shows that central banks should improve their credibility for monetary policy to be effective and their policies must be designed keeping in view the strong impact of US rate on global monetary environment. Originality/value This paper provides first empirical evidence of the impact of discount rates on the returns of Islamic stocks in different market conditions.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elie Bouri ◽  
Konstantinos Gkillas ◽  
Rangan Gupta ◽  
Clement Kyei

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-82
Author(s):  
George S. Tavlas

There has long been a presumption that the price-level stabilization frameworks of Irving Fisher and Chicagoans Henry Simons and Lloyd Mints were essentially equivalent. I show that there were subtle, but important, differences in the rationales underlying the policies of Fisher and the Chicagoans. Fisher’s framework involved substantial discretion in the setting of the policy instruments; for the Chicagoans the objective of a policy rule was to tie the hands of the authorities in order to reduce discretion and, thus, monetary policy uncertainty. In contrast to Fisher, the Chicagoans provided assessments of the workings of alternative rules, assessed various criteria—including simplicity and reduction of political pressures—in the specification of rules, and concluded that rules would provide superior performance compared with discretion. Each of these characteristics provided a direct link to the rules-based framework of Milton Friedman. Like Friedman’s framework, Simons’s preferred rule targeted a policy instrument.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document