scholarly journals On the question of responsibility for procedural unfairness in the trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 234-236
Author(s):  
Valentina G Laskova ◽  
Svetlana G Salmina
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Modern Science ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article deals with topical issues in modern science, the problem of abuse of rights in civil proceedings. Based on a study of the various proposals to combat such behavior and as a result of the analysis of the civil procedural law to prevent misconduct, the possible changes and additions to the existing Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation.

Concept of Single Civil Procedure Code: Suggestions of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Екатерина Ганичева ◽  
Ekaterina Ganicheva ◽  
Андрей Габов ◽  
Andrey Gabov ◽  
Мария Глазкова ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Comparative Law ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Legislative Activity ◽  
The Government

This publication is the result of collective discussion at the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation of the Concept of a common code of civil procedure adopted in 2014. The article deals with the problem of harmonization of legislation governing the consideration of the various categories of cases within the jurisdiction of the courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts. Particular attention is paid to the problems of access to justice, coordination of legislative activity, taking into account the future prospects of unification of the rules and institutions governing the procedural arrangements of civil, administrative and criminal proceedings. The article describes the objective relationship between the development of an of procedural law and the law on the judicial system, which must be taken into account when solving problems to ensure the effective operation of the courts at all stages of trial and in all judicial instances. Certain problems that arose after the unification of the higher judiciary authorities are reviewed, recommendations aimed at improving the structure and organizational forms of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation are given.

scholarly journals To the admissibility of the civil law exemption of property from arrest, imposed in the criminal proceedings: domestic and foreign experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-200
Author(s):  
Natalia Kashtanova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Judicial Protection

The subject of paper deals with the legal nature of measures of criminal procedural compulsionin the form of seizure of property.Methodological basis of the article is based on general scientific dialectical methods of cognitionof objective reality of the legal processes and phenomena that allowed us to conduct anobjective assessment of the state of legislation and law enforcement practice in the proceduralaspects of the cancellation of the seizure of property in criminal proceedings of Russia.The results and scope of it’s application. It is submitted that the cancellation of the seizureof the property (or the individual limit) is allowed only on the grounds and in the mannerprescribed by the criminal procedure law of the Russian Federation. However, the studyfound serious contradictions in the application of the relevant law. In particular, cases inwhich the question of exemption of property from arrest (exclusion from the inventory),imposed in the criminal case was resolved in a civil procedure that, in the opinion of theauthor of the publication, is extremely unacceptable.On the stated issues topics analyzes opinions of scientists who say that the dispute aboutthe release of impounded property may be allowed in civil proceedings, including pendingresolution of the criminal case on the merits. The author strongly disagrees with this positionand supports those experts who argue that the filing of a claim for exemption of propertyfrom arrest (exclusion from the inventory) the reviewed judicial act of imposing of arrestwithout recognition per se invalid. In this regard, the author cites the legal position ofthe constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, from which clearly follows that of theright of everyone to judicial protection does not imply the possibility of choice of the citizenat its discretion, techniques and procedures of judicial protection, since the features of suchjudicial protection is defined in specific Federal laws.The author analyzes and appreciates Kazakhstan's experience of legal regulation of the permissibilityof filing a civil claim for exemption of property from seizure imposed in criminalproceedings. The author notes that the new civil procedural legislation of the Republic ofKazakhstan, which came into force from 01 January 2016, clearly captures that considerationin the civil proceedings are not subject to claims for exemption of property from seizureby the criminal prosecution body.Conclusions. Necessity of amendment to article 422 of the Civil Procedure Code of Russia:this article should not apply to cases of application of measures of criminal procedural compulsionin the form of seizure of property. Among other things, the author proposed additionsto part 9 of article 115 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Russia.

scholarly journals On Legal Basis of a Claim

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 107-116
Author(s):  
V. N. Ivakin
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Burden Of Proof ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
General Concept ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Procedural Code ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Grounds

The science of civil procedural law advances an opinion that it is necessary to distinguish between the  factual and legal basis of a claim. The latter needs to be singled out, since the specific claim always results from a  specific legal relationship, from the subjective right of the plaintiff to be protected. The main argument, according to  A. A. Dobrovolskiy, is not the presence of the relevant norm in the law but its practical necessity to recognize these  legal grounds as an integral part of a claim. However, the author here confuses two different issues: the expediency  and the obligatory existence of a legal basis for the claim, although in fact these are far from identical concepts.  The author also wrongfully identifies the concepts of "basis of a claim" and "basis of satisfaction of a claim", as  a result of which the legal basis of a claim is always included in the basis of a claim. This position is supported by  some other scientists who dealt with the problems of the claim (G. L. Osokina, O. V. Isaenkova). Meanwhile, if we  consider a claim as a legal phenomenon in general, then the legal basis is indeed a necessary component of the  general concept of “the basis of a claim”. However, if we turn to specific claims, then the legal basis of the claim  can be either optional (Code of Civil Procedure of the RSFSR 1964) or mandatory (Code of Civil Procedure of the  Russian Federation 2002). Currently, in accordance with paragraph 4, Part 2 of Art. 131 of the Civil Procedural Code  of the Russian Federation, the statement of claim must indicate what constitutes the violation or threat of violation  of the rights, freedoms or legitimate interests of the plaintiff. The paper draws attention to the shortcomings of  this norm, and thus suggests to remove it from the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation. At the end of  the paper, it is suggested that with the development of civil procedural legislation, reference to the norms of law  in a statement of claim will become mandatory. However, the recognition by V. V. Yarkov of this provision as valid  by virtue of imposing the burden of proof on the parties seems to be unreasoned.

CLASS ACTIONS IN CIVIL PROCEDURE: ENFORCEMENT ISSUES

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 86-106
Author(s):  
V.V. YARKOV
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Class Action ◽  
Class Actions ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Special Rules

The issues of legal regulation and the first experience of law enforcement of class actions on the example of chapter 22.3 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation are considered. Despite the generally unified legal regulation of class proceedings in arbitration and civil proceedings, in the practice of courts of general jurisdiction there are specific issues that need to be addressed. In article value of unity of all conditions of qualification of the declared requirements as the class action is underlined, and also consequences of non-compliance of conditions of certification are revealed. Attention has been drawn to the necessity of application of the general rules of action proceedings along with the special rules of chapter 22.3 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in consideration of class actions. Also within the framework of this study the author concludes that each new legal institute raises a number of controversial issues in the process of law enforcement. And that is why it is very important to refer to the general provisions of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, developed under the guidance of Professor M.K. Treushnikov, which allow to find the best solution for this or that problem of legal regulation and law enforcement.

ON THE NATURE OF RELATIONSHIPS FOR RECONCILIATION AND THE DESIRABILITY OF THEIR REGULATION IN CIVIL PROCEDURAL CODES

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 109-131
Author(s):  
S.S. KAZIKHANOVA
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Arbitration Procedure ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Code ◽  
The Relationship

The article analyzes the changes made to the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation by the Federal Law of 26 July 2019 No. 197-FZ, related to the regulation of conciliation procedures. The question is raised as to whether the civil procedural codes should regulate relations on reconciliation and to what extent. Agreement is expressed with those authors who believe that, by their nature, the relations that develop in conciliation procedures between its participants (including in cases where the conciliation procedure is directed by a judge) are not procedural and are not part of the subject of civil procedural law. The non-procedural nature of the relationship between the judicial conciliator and the court in the procedure of judicial conciliation under the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and the Administrative code of the Russian Federation is substantiated. It is concluded that due to the qualitatively different nature of reconciliation relations from civil procedural relations, as well as their lack of connection with the resolution of a civil case in a certain system of guarantees (civil procedural form), there is no place for articles on individual conciliation procedures among procedural norms. In this regard, it is proposed to either exclude them, or, as an option, transfer them to the appendix to the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, the Administrative code of the Russian Federation (just as in the Civil Procedure Code of 1964 there was an appendix, in particular, about the arbitration court).

CONCILIATION PROCEDURES IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN THE LIGHT OF RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Тимур Султанович Габазов ◽  
Аюб Бисланович Сулейманов
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Statistical Information ◽  
Peaceful Settlement ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
The Russian Federation

Статья посвящена исследованию актуальности института примирительных процедур в свете введения новой главы в ГПК РФ. Описывается процесс возникновения этой законодательной новеллы, столь необходимой в настоящее время в гражданском судопроизводстве, принимая во внимание юридического значения, придаваемое мирному урегулированию гражданских споров, рассматриваемых судами общей юрисдикции. Работа также предоставляет актуальную статистическую информацию. The article is devoted to the study of the relevance of the institution of conciliation procedures in the light of the introduction of a new chapter in the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation. The process of the emergence of this legislative novelty, which is so necessary at present in civil proceedings, taking into account the legal significance attached to the peaceful settlement of civil disputes considered by the courts of general jurisdiction, is described. The work also provides up-to-date statistical information.

INSTITUTE OF CONCILIATION PROCEDURES IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS, TAKING INTO ACCOUNT CHAPTER 14.1 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Тимур Султанович Габазов ◽  
Аюб Бисланович Сулейманов
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Statistical Information ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Peaceful Settlement ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

Статья посвящена изучению актуальности института примирительных процедур в свете введения в ГПК РФ новой главы. Описывается сам процесс возникновения данной законодательной новеллы, столь необходимой в настоящее время в гражданском судопроизводстве с учетом придания статутного значения мирному урегулированию гражданско-правовых споров, которые являются предметом рассмотрения в судах общей юрисдикции. В работе также приводится актуальная статистическая информация. The article is devoted to the study of the relevance of the institution of conciliation procedures in the light of the introduction of a new chapter in the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation. The very process of the emergence of this legislative novelty, which is so necessary at present in civil proceedings, taking into account the attachment of statutory significance to the peaceful settlement of civil disputes, which are the subject of consideration in courts of general jurisdiction, is described. The work also provides up-to-date statistical information.

Consequences of procedural rules violation on conciliation procedures in civil proceedings (to the adoption of the Federal Law of July 26, 2019 No. 197-FZ “On Amending Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation”)

2019 ◽  
pp. 549-557
Author(s):  
Andrew Vladimirovich Yudin
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Arbitration Process ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Draw Conclusion ◽  
Court Of First Instance

The relevance of the study lies in the fact that the reform of the procedural legislation in line with expanding the possibilities of parties reconciliation at all stages of the civil and arbitration process, including through mediation, has generated a number of scientific and practical problems, one of which is the assessment of the imperativeness of the rules of procedural law on fulfillment by a court or arbitration tribunal of an obligation to facilitate parties reconciliation. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the arguments both in favor of the fact that the court’s failure to fulfill the obligation to cooperate in reconciling the parties should serve as the basis for the an-nulment of the judicial act, and in favor of the fact that this violation does not affect the decision correctness on the merits of the dispute. We draw conclusion that, in certain circumstances, a provisions violation on conciliation may constitute a reason for the decision annulment (for example, in cases where the court of the verification instance, in order to make up for the omissions of the court of first instance, leads the parties to reconciliation, although annulment with the termination of the proceedings in this case is objective consequence of achieving the result of conciliation procedures); in other cases, the discovery of the fact that the potential of conciliation procedures has not been used, with the revealed possibility of parties conciliation, may serve as the basis for making a special ruling to the court of first instance. But in any case, the court’s failure to reconcile the parties would constitute a violation of civil procedural law, which should not be left without any reaction from the courts of verification instances.

scholarly journals Problems and Prospects of Legal Regulation of the Status of Persons Contributing to the Administration of Justice in Civil Proceedings

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-115
Author(s):  
O. N. Gorodnova ◽  
A. A. Makarushkova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Administration Of Justice ◽  
The Status ◽  
Procedural Code ◽  
The Russian Federation

Based on a comparative analysis of the norms of the procedural legislation of the Russian Federation, the paper discusses certain problems and prospects of legal regulation of the status of persons contributing to the administration of justice: expert, specialist, witness, interpreter, assistant judge, court clerk, as applied to civil proceedings.The authors analyze modern approaches to the persons contributing to the administration of justice, considering, along with traditional subjects, such a procedural figure as judicial representative in a civil procedure, taking into account the latest changes and additions to the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, entering into force on September 1, 2019.Based on a comparative analysis of the provisions of the arbitration and civil procedural laws, the authors of the paper point that the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation lacks a separate chapter on legal regulation of the status of participants in civil proceedings, including those assisting in the administration of justice. This makes it difficult to establish the circle of such entities in practice. In this regard, they propose, by analogy with the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, to fix the circle of participants in the civil procedure in a separate chapter, revealing in detail and specifying the legal status in other articles of the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation of other participants in the civil proceedings.In the paper, the authors conclude that the judicial representative must be considered as an independent subject of the civil proceedings. Finally, this problematic issue can only be resolved by making appropriate changes and additions to the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation.It is noted that, despite the absence of special instructions in the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation to other participants in the process, their list is not exhaustive and in fact, the circle of persons involved in the case is much wider. Such persons include court bailiffs and witnesses, whose legal status is currently debatable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document