Propagation of PL waves across the United States

1964 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-160
Author(s):  
Jack Oliver
Keyword(s):  
Rayleigh Waves ◽  
Velocity Dispersion ◽  
Wave Length ◽  
Seismic Refraction ◽  
The United States ◽  
Geometrical Spreading ◽  
Period Range ◽  
Long Period ◽  
Reflection Data ◽  
Phase Velocity Dispersion

abstract The two large Mexican earthquakes of May 1962 excited PL waves which were unusually well recorded by long period seismographs at a number of U. S. stations of the standardized network of the USC&GS. These data were used to make the first direct determinations of attenuation and of phase velocity dispersion of PL waves in the crust-mantle wave guide. When the effects of dispersion and geometrical spreading are removed, the Q for PL waves in the period range of 35 to 50 seconds is about 10, in contrast to a Q of about 150 for Rayleigh waves of the same wave length. There is a clear dependence of PL dispersion on crustal structure, with data for western profiles indicating crustal thicknesses greater than those for eastern profiles. Such information is complementary to information on dispersion of other types of surface waves and to seismic refraction and reflection data and can provide additional constraint on models of the crust-mantle system.

New techniques for the determination of surface wave phase velocities

1968 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 1021-1034 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Bloch ◽  
A. L. Hales
Keyword(s):  
Phase Velocity ◽  
Rayleigh Waves ◽  
World Wide ◽  
Velocity Dispersion ◽  
Cross Product ◽  
New Techniques ◽  
Phase Velocities ◽  
Phase Velocity Dispersion ◽  
The World

abstract A number of new techniques have been developed for the determination of phase velocities from the digitized seismograms from pairs of stations. One of these techniques is to Fourier analyze the sum (or difference) of the two seismograms after time shifting in steps to correspond to steps in phase velocity. The amplitude of the summed seismogram is a maximum for any particular period when both seismograms are in phase at that period. Another method is to pass both seismograms through a narrow bandpass digital filter centered at various periods and form the cross product of the filtered seismograms, after time shifting. The average of the resultant time series is a maximum when the two signals are in phase. The computer output is a matrix consisting of amplitudes or averages as a function of phase velocity and period. The phase velocity dispersion is determined from the contoured matrix. Using these techniques, interstation phase velocities of Rayleigh waves have been determined for the “World Wide Network Standard Stations” at Pretoria, Bulawayo and Windhoek. The method using cross-products is the most efficient.

Rayleigh wave dispersion in the Pacific Ocean for the period range 20 to 140 seconds

1962 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 333-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Kuo ◽  
James Brune ◽  
Maurice Major
Keyword(s):  
Phase Velocity ◽  
Rayleigh Wave ◽  
Rayleigh Waves ◽  
Initial Phase ◽  
Velocity Curve ◽  
Period Range ◽  
Long Period ◽  
Phase Velocities ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
Group Velocities

ABSTRACT Rayleigh wave data obtained from Columbia long-period seismographs installed during the International Geophysical Year (I.G.Y.) at Honolulu, Hawaii; Suva, Fiji; and Mt. Tsukuba, Japan, are analyzed to determine group and phase velocities in the Pacific for the period range 20 to 140 seconds. Group velocities are determined by usual techniques (Ewing and Press, 1952, p. 377). Phase velocities are determined by assuming the initial phase to be independent of period and choosing the initial phase so that the phase velocity curve agrees in the long period range with the phase velocity curve of the mantle Rayleigh wave given by Brune (1961). Correlations of wave trains between the stations Honolulu and Mt. Tsukuba are used to obtain phase velocity values independent of initial phase. The group velocity rises from 3.5 km/sec at a period of about 20 see to a maximum of 4.0 km/sec at a period of about 40 sec and then decreases to 3.65 km/sec at a period of about 140 sec. Phase velocity is nearly constant in the period range 30–75 sec with a value slightly greater than 4.0 km/sec. Most of the phase velocity curves indicate a maximum and a minimum at periods of approximately 30 and 50 sec respectively. At longer periods the phase velocities increase to 4.18 km/sec at a period of 120 sec. Except across the Melanesian-New Zealand region, dispersion curves for paths of Rayleigh waves throughout the Pacific basin proper are rather uniform and agree fairly well with theoretical dispersion curves for models with a normal oceanic crust and a low velocity channel. Both phase and group velocities are comparatively lower for the paths of Rayleigh waves across the Melanesian-New Zealand region, suggesting a thicker crustal layer and/or lower crustal velocities in this region.

Effect of Au drops on the phase velocity dispersion of Rayleigh waves in Si crystals

2007 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 063516
Author(s):  
A. Tarasenko ◽  
P. Bohac ◽  
R. D. Fedorovich ◽  
L. Jastrabik ◽  
R. Picek
Keyword(s):  
Phase Velocity ◽  
Rayleigh Waves ◽  
Velocity Dispersion ◽  
Phase Velocity Dispersion

On the nature of oceanic seismic surface waves with predominant periods of 6 to 8 seconds

1961 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 437-455
Author(s):  
Jack Oliver ◽  
James Dorman
Keyword(s):  
Surface Waves ◽  
Deep Sea ◽  
Rayleigh Waves ◽  
Seismic Refraction ◽  
Normal Modes ◽  
Quantitative Agreement ◽  
Period Range ◽  
Oceanic Surface ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Seismic Surface Waves

Abstract The train of normally-dispersed, short-period, oceanic surface waves, commonly identified by the near-sinusoidal nature of all three components of ground motion in the period range of about 6 to 8 seconds, is shown to correspond to propagation in the first Love and first shear normal modes. Theoretical dispersion curves which agree with the observed dispersion of these short-period waves, as well as with dispersion of Rayleigh waves and Love waves of longer periods, are obtained for layered models of the oceanic crust which are consistent with results of seismic refraction studies. In order to obtain good quantitative agreement between theory and observation, it is essential that the effect of the small but finite rigidity of the deep-sea sedimentary layer be included in the calculations.

Numerical Calculation on Flaw Response in Inhomogeneous Media

2011 ◽  
Vol 328-330 ◽  
pp. 1188-1193
Author(s):  
Gang Feng Zheng ◽  
Bin Wu ◽  
Cun Fu He
Keyword(s):  
Velocity Dispersion ◽  
Solid Medium ◽  
Ultrasonic Attenuation ◽  
Geological Mapping ◽  
Medical Studies ◽  
Ultrasonic Beam ◽  
Ultrasonic Methods ◽  
Phase Velocity Dispersion ◽  
Different Dimensions ◽  
Ultrasonic Nde

Ultrasonic methods are used in a wide variety of applications including medical studies, geological mapping, and nondestructive evaluation (NDE) tests. In the field of ultrasonic NDE, it is necessary to treat inverse problems of various types. The objective of this paper is to predict the flaw response in an inhomogeneous solid medium. A mathematical modelling of the testing situation is very valuable for a number of reasons. The modelling helps in developing physical intuition and in the interpretation of tests. Multi-Gaussian Beam (MGB) model is used to represent the incident ultrasonic beam. The effect of ultrasonic attenuation and phase velocity dispersion due to grain scattering is included in the predictions. The variation of received voltage is analyzed against the distance of the flaw from the transducer for different dimensions of a square cylinder void. The effect of variation of mean diameter of the grains on the received voltage for different domain of interest is also studied.

Observation of gliding tremors from the Gulf of Guinea might help solve over 50 year old mystery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Bruland ◽  
Sarah Mader ◽  
Céline Hadziioannou
Keyword(s):  
Spectral Analysis ◽  
Volcanic Activity ◽  
Rayleigh Waves ◽  
Spectral Characteristics ◽  
Gulf Of Guinea ◽  
Seismic Amplitude ◽  
Long Period ◽  
Amplitude Spectra ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Over Time

<p>In the 1960's a peak in the seismic amplitude spectra around 26 s was discovered and detected on stations worldwide. The source was located in the Gulf of Guinea, with approximate coordinates (0,0), and was believed to be generated continuously. A source with similar spectral characteristics was discovered near the Vanuatu Islands, at nearly the antipodal location of the Gulf of Guinea source. Since it was located close to the volcanoes in Vanuatu, this source is commonly attributed to magmatic processes. The physical cause of the 26 s microseism, however, remains unclear.</p><p>We investigate the source location and evolution of the 26 s microseim using data from permanent broadband stations in Germany, France and Algeria and temporary arrays in Morocco, Cameroon and Botswana for spectral analysis and 3-C beamforming to get closer to resolving the source mechanism responsible for this enigmatic signal. We find that the signal modulates over time and is not always detectable, but occasionally it becomes so energetic it can be observed on stations worldwide. Such a burst can last for hours or days. The signal is visible on stations globally approximately 30 percent of the time. Our beamforming analysis confirms that the source is located in the Gulf of Guinea, as shown in previous studies, and that the location is temporally stable. Whenever the signal is detectable, both Love and Rayleigh waves are generated. We discover a spectral glide effect associated with the bursts, that so far has not been reported in the literature. </p><p>The spectral glides last for about two days and are observed on stations globally. Although at higher frequencies, very long period tremors and gliding tremors are also observed on volcanoes as Redoubt in Alaska and Arenal in Costa Rica, suggesting that the origin of the 26 s tremor is also volcanic. However, there is no reported volcanic activity in the area where the source appears to be located.</p><p> </p>

Finite-Difference Modeling and Characteristics Analysis of Love Waves in Anisotropic-Viscoelastic Media

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shichuan Yuan ◽  
Zhenguo Zhang ◽  
Hengxin Ren ◽  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Xianhai Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Difference ◽  
Phase Velocity ◽  
Velocity Dispersion ◽  
Love Waves ◽  
Velocity Anisotropy ◽  
Viscoelastic Media ◽  
Phase Velocities ◽  
Phase Velocity Dispersion ◽  
Anisotropic Elastic ◽  
Attenuation Anisotropy

ABSTRACT In this study, the characteristics of Love waves in viscoelastic vertical transversely isotropic layered media are investigated by finite-difference numerical modeling. The accuracy of the modeling scheme is tested against the theoretical seismograms of isotropic-elastic and isotropic-viscoelastic media. The correctness of the modeling results is verified by the theoretical phase-velocity dispersion curves of Love waves in isotropic or anisotropic elastic or viscoelastic media. In two-layer half-space models, the effects of velocity anisotropy, viscoelasticity, and attenuation anisotropy of media on Love waves are studied in detail by comparing the modeling results obtained for anisotropic-elastic, isotropic-viscoelastic, and anisotropic-viscoelastic media with those obtained for isotropic-elastic media. Then, Love waves in three typical four-layer half-space models are simulated to further analyze the characteristics of Love waves in anisotropic-viscoelastic layered media. The results show that Love waves propagating in anisotropic-viscoelastic media are affected by both the anisotropy and viscoelasticity of media. The velocity anisotropy of media causes substantial changes in the values and distribution range of phase velocities of Love waves. The viscoelasticity of media leads to the amplitude attenuation and phase velocity dispersion of Love waves, and these effects increase with decreasing quality factors. The attenuation anisotropy of media indicates that the viscoelasticity degree of media is direction dependent. Comparisons of phase velocity ratios suggest that the change degree of Love-wave phase velocities due to viscoelasticity is much less than that caused by velocity anisotropy.

LONG-PERIOD SURFACE-RELATED MULTIPLE SUPPRESSION IN 2D MARINE SEISMIC DATA USING PREDICTIVE DECONVOLUTION AND COMBINATION OF SURFACE-RELATED MULTIPLE ELIMINATION AND PARABOLIC RADON FILTERING

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pimpawee Sittipan ◽  
Pisanu Wongpornchai
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Seismic Reflection ◽  
Petroleum Reservoirs ◽  
The United States ◽  
Multiple Reflections ◽  
Long Period ◽  
Predictive Deconvolution ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Marine Seismic ◽  
Multiple Elimination

Some of the important petroleum reservoirs accumulate beneath the seas and oceans. Marine seismic reflection method is the most efficient method and is widely used in the petroleum industry to map and interpret the potential of petroleum reservoirs. Multiple reflections are a particular problem in marine seismic reflection investigation, as they often obscure the target reflectors in seismic profiles. Multiple reflections can be categorized by considering the shallowest interface on which the bounces take place into two types: internal multiples and surface-related multiples. Besides, the multiples can be categorized on the interfaces where the bounces take place, a difference between long-period and short-period multiples can be considered. The long-period surface-related multiples on 2D marine seismic data of the East Coast of the United States-Southern Atlantic Margin were focused on this research. The seismic profile demonstrates the effectiveness of the results from predictive deconvolution and the combination of surface-related multiple eliminations (SRME) and parabolic Radon filtering. First, predictive deconvolution applied on conventional processing is the method of multiple suppression. The other, SRME is a model-based and data-driven surface-related multiple elimination method which does not need any assumptions. And the last, parabolic Radon filtering is a moveout-based method for residual multiple reflections based on velocity discrimination between primary and multiple reflections, thus velocity model and normal-moveout correction are required for this method. The predictive deconvolution is ineffective for long-period surface-related multiple removals. However, the combination of SRME and parabolic Radon filtering can attenuate almost long-period surface-related multiple reflections and provide a high-quality seismic images of marine seismic data.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document