Comparing strain events: A case study for the Homestead Valley earthquakes

1988 ◽  
Vol 78 (5) ◽  
pp. 1693-1706
Author(s):  
N. E. King ◽  
D. C. Agnew ◽  
F. Wyatt

Abstract We present a procedure for comparing strain events at different sites, and apply it to observations for the Homestead Valley earthquake sequence of 15 March 1979. Coseismic strain steps occurred on two laser strainmeters at Piñon Flat Observatory (PFO) and on a creepmeter spanning the San Andreas fault at Wiebe Ranch (XWR); the creepmeter records were studied by Leary and Malin (1984). The PFO coseismic strains are consistent with a source model derived from near-field geodetic measurements, while the XWR coseismic extension is 1200 times too large and of the wrong sign. The XWR instrument showed an anomalous extension about 20 hours before the earthquake (Leary and Malin, 1984), but no such signals were detected on the PFO strainmeters at this time. To compare these preseismic observations we must make some assumption about the preseismic source, and we choose to assume that any precursory slip occurred on the fault plane that eventually ruptured. Under this assumption, the preseismic XWR and PFO records cannot be reconciled unless the preseismic dislocation is left-lateral or mostly thrust, and the fault zone at XWR magnifies strain by a factor of 2900 or more. This strain magnification implies that the fault-zone shear modulus at XWR is 107 Pa, three orders of magnitude smaller than the shear modulus of typical crustal rocks. However, earth-tide observations at XWR constrain the strain magnification at this site to be less than about 55. Thus the preseismic extension at XWR is probably not a precursor to the Homestead Valley earthquake.

Geomorphology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 107592
Author(s):  
Tianjun Qi ◽  
Xingmin Meng ◽  
Feng Qing ◽  
Yan Zhao ◽  
Wei Shi ◽  
...  

Geology ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 3 (8) ◽  
pp. 437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Kovach ◽  
Amos Nur ◽  
Robert L. Wesson ◽  
Russell Robinson

1983 ◽  
Vol 73 (6A) ◽  
pp. 1701-1720
Author(s):  
R. Feng ◽  
T. V. McEvilly

Abstract A seismic reflection profile crossing the San Andreas fault zone in central California was conducted in 1978. Results are complicated by the extreme lateral heterogeneity and low velocities in the fault zone. Other evidence for severe lateral velocity change across the fault zone lies in hypocenter bias and nodal plane distortion for earthquakes on the fault. Conventional interpretation and processing methods for reflection data are hard-pressed in this situation. Using the inverse ray method of May and Covey (1981), with an initial model derived from a variety of data and the impedance contrasts inferred from the preserved amplitude stacked section, an iterative inversion process yields a velocity model which, while clearly nonunique, is consistent with the various lines of evidence on the fault zone structure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document