An examination of the long-run market reaction to the announcement of dividend omissions and reductions

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Liu
2004 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 461-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konan Chan ◽  
David Ikenberry ◽  
Inmoo Lee

AbstractPrevious studies offer a mixed understanding of the economic role of stock repurchases. This paper investigates three key economic motivations—mispricing, disgorging free cash flow, and increasing leverage—by evaluating cross-sectional differences in both the initial market reaction and long-run performance. The initial reaction provides some support for the mispricing story. However, subsequent earnings-related information shocks suggest that the initial market reaction is incomplete and that long-run performance may be informative. The long-horizon return evidence is most consistent with the mispricing hypothesis and, to some degree, the free cash flow hypothesis. We find little support for the leverage hypothesis.


2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 55-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chhavi Mehta ◽  
P K Jain ◽  
Surendra S Yadav

Theoretically, stock dividends have no impact on financial position of the announcing company as net worth and total assets remain the same, though empirical evidence across the globe shows that markets react to stock dividend announcements. The present study analyses the market reaction pertaining to stock dividend decisions in the Indian context. Market reaction has been captured in terms of impact on returns, liquidity, and risk. The sample includes 51 ‘pure’ stock dividend announcements from January 1, 2002 to June 30, 2010. The study finds that the announcement of stock dividends induces an increase in the wealth of the shareholders in India. A consistent pattern of positive average abnormal returns during the pre-announcement window till the announcement day and a pattern of negative average abnormal returns during the post-announcement window have been observed. On cumulating these results, the shareholders of the companies that issued stock dividends gain significant returns. The justification for such results seems to be that the information about the stock dividends announcement reaches the investors prior to the decision date as it is manda-tory for the issuing company to inform the exchange (where it is listed) about the date of the board meeting. It has been observed that the companies usually inform the exchange seven days prior to the day of the board meeting. In most of the cases, the companies provide the agenda item information along with the board meeting date to the exchange. In such a situation, the moment this information about the agenda item is given to the exchange, this becomes public information and investors start reacting to it. The cumulative average abnormal return values over various size event windows depict that an investor can earn substantial returns if he purchases the shares on the day the news of board meeting (to announce stock dividends) comes to the market and sells them one day after the announcement day. The investor can also gain if the shares are purchased one day prior to the announcement day and are sold one day after the announcement day. The trading quantity reduces significantly immediately after these decisions are announced. On a short-term basis, the investors seem to perceive that the announcement of stock dividends provides signals about the firm's bright future prospects. This leads to a decline in trading quantity as investors, who own the shares at the time of announcement, prefer to hold the shares expecting an increase in their wealth in future. In the long-run, a marginally positive impact has been observed. The announcement of stock dividends reduces variability of returns in the short-run as well as in the long run, lending price stability to the stocks of the announcing companies.


Author(s):  
Alvin Fabian ◽  
Eko Budi Santoso

Abstract: This study aims to examine the differences in market reaction before and after the announcement of dividend omissions and dividend initiations in non- financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2016-2018. The sample used in this study was 71 companies consisting of 26 companies that announced dividend omissions and 45 companies that announced dividend initiations. The sample was determined using the purposive sampling method. This study used the event study method with an event window period of 5 days before the announcement, the announcement day, and 5 days after the announcement. The Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test results in this study indicate that there are no differences in market reaction before and after the announcement of dividend omissions. Meanwhile the announcement of dividend initiations shows that there are differences in market reaction before and after the announcement of dividend initiations. Keywords: Event study, Dividend Omissions, Dividend Initiations, Abnormal Return


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Mr Darmawan

This study examined the signalling theory about how the market / investors respond to dividend announcements made by companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2008-2012. This period was chosen because the economy and economic growth of Indonesia is relatively stable. In general, the objective of this research is to develop new theoretical approaches, in an effort to resolve the conceptual controversies regarding the impact of dividend policy on firm value. That in detail, in particular, objective: To analyze and empirically test the market reaction to the announcement dividend omissions, as well as Analyze and test empirically the firm-specific characteristics variables that affect the market reaction. The samples are all companies that announced dividend policy for 5 years as many as 242 companies with 729 event announcements. The results showed that in events dividend announcement found a significant reaction from the market. At the announcement of dividend omissions, there are 5 significant observations with 2 observations fit in theory. The study also shows none of the significant characteristics of the company is able to explain the market reaction to dividend announcements.


2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (02) ◽  
pp. 2050007
Author(s):  
Andreas Charitou ◽  
Irene Karamanou ◽  
George Loizides

In this study, we examine whether an IPO’s voluntary disclosure on the intention to engage in future M&A activity affects the market reaction to a subsequent acquisition and whether it is related to the acquisition’s long-run performance. Using a dataset of European IPOs during the period 2001–2017, we first document that disclosers are more likely to engage in future M&A activity than non-disclosers, thus supporting that such costless disclosures are credible. Secondly, we document a less positive market reaction around the announcement of an acquisition for disclosers than for non-disclosers, consistent with the anticipation hypothesis. Additional analyses suggest, however, that the market reaction is stronger and positive for target firms in countries with weak shareholder protection and legal environment and lower information quality. This suggests that when the acquisition is deemed more uncertain, the market perceives the disclosure of the intention to acquire as capturing a more diligent acquisition plan, consistent with the preparation hypothesis. Finally, results show that the long-run performance of the combined entity is more negative for disclosers than for non-disclosers. However, consistent with the market reaction results, this relation is reversed when the acquired company operates in a poor investor protection environment, suggesting that these acquisitions are associated with better long-term performance consistent with the conjecture that these acquisitions are also more carefully planned.


2005 ◽  
pp. 133-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Balashova

The method of analyzing and modeling cyclical fluctuations of economy initiated by F. Kydland and E. Prescott - the 2004 Nobel Prize winners in Economics - is considered in the article. They proposed a new business cycle theory integrating the theory of long-run economic growth as well as the microeconomic theory of consumers and firms behavior. Simple version of general dynamic and stochastic macroeconomic model is described. The given approach which was formulated in their fundamental work "Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations" (1982) gave rise to an extensive research program and is still used as a basic instrument for investigating cyclical processes in economy nowadays.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document