Witnessing a New Era? – The Emerging Role of Targeted Drugs in the Medical Treatment of Advanced Medullary and Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 122
Author(s):  
Jochen Lorch ◽  
Wieland Voigt ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
New Era ◽  
Cancer Subtypes

The treatment of advanced thyroid cancer is currently entering a new era due to the introduction of targeted therapy into modern cancer treatment. The growing insight into the molecular biology of thyroid cancer and on the development of numerous mainly multitargeted agents provide the basis for new treatment strategies. In particular, activation of mitogenic and angiogenic signalling pathways are suitable targets as preclinical and clinical data suggest. Several Phase II and a few Phase III studies were launched in thyroid cancer which included medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) and anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) but only a few focused specifically on theses subtypes. A number of smaller Phase II trials reported promising response rates and progression-free survival. Results from a randomised Phase III trial in MTC with vandetanib, a combined vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 + 3 (VEGF-R2+3) and RET multi tyrosine kinase inhibitor demonstrated significant clinical activity and resulted in the first approval of a kinase inhibitor for the treatment of MTC in 2011. Unlike in MTC, in ATC the prognosis is dismal due to the aggressive nature of the disease. Some mainly vascular targeting agents alone or in combination with chemotherapy have shown interesting activity in this disease and have raised new hope. Particularly the combination of fosbretabulin with a chemotherapy backbone of paclitaxel and carboplatin tripled the one-year survival rate in a recent Phase II trial which included 80 patients with ATC. In this review, we provide a brief overview of the general treatment concept of MTC and ATC and summarise the compiled evidence published on targeted agents in these rare thyroid cancer subtypes.

Witnessing a New Era?—The Emerging Role of Targeted Drugs in the Medical Treatment of Advanced Medullary and Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 08 (02) ◽  
pp. 122
Author(s):  
Jochen Lorch ◽  
Wieland Voigt ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
New Era ◽  
Cancer Subtypes

The treatment of advanced thyroid cancer is currently entering a new era due to the introduction of targeted therapy into modern cancer treatment. The growing insight into the molecular biology of thyroid cancer and on the development of numerous mainly multitargeted agents provide the basis for new treatment strategies. In particular, activation of mitogenic and angiogenic signaling pathways are suitable targets as preclinical and clinical data suggest. Several Phase II and a few Phase III studies were launched in thyroid cancer which included medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) and anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) but only a few focused specifically on theses subtypes. A number of smaller Phase II trials reported promising response rates and progression-free survival. Results from a randomized Phase III trial in MTC with vandetanib, a combined vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 + 3 (VEGF-R2+3) and RET multi tyrosine kinase inhibitor demonstrated significant clinical activity and resulted in the first approval of a kinase inhibitor for the treatment of MTC in 2011. Unlike in MTC, in ATC the prognosis is dismal due to the aggressive nature of the disease. Some mainly vascular targeting agents alone or in combination with chemotherapy have shown interesting activity in this disease and have raised new hope. Particularly the combination of fosbretabulin with a chemotherapy backbone of paclitaxel and carboplatin tripled the one-year survival rate in a recent Phase II trial which included 80 patients with ATC. In this review, we provide a brief overview of the general treatment concept of MTC and ATC and summarize the compiled evidence published on targeted agents in these rare thyroid cancer subtypes.

scholarly journals Three Phase II Cytokine Working Group Trials of gp100 (210M) Peptide Plus High-Dose Interleukin-2 in Patients With HLA-A2–Positive Advanced Melanoma

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (14) ◽  
pp. 2292-2298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Sosman ◽  
Carole Carrillo ◽  
Walter J. Urba ◽  
Lawrence Flaherty ◽  
Michael B. Atkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Cell Immunity ◽  
Three Phase

Purpose High-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) induces responses in 15% to 20% of patients with advanced melanoma; 5% to 8% are durable complete responses (CRs). The HLA-A2–restricted, modified gp100 peptide (210M) induces T-cell immunity in vivo and has little antitumor activity but, combined with high-dose IL-2, reportedly has a 42% (13 of 31 patients) response rate (RR). We evaluated 210M with one of three different IL-2 schedules to determine whether a basis exists for a phase III trial. Patients and Methods In three separate phase II trials, patients with melanoma received 210M subcutaneously during weeks 1, 4, 7, and 10 and standard high-dose IL-2 during weeks 1 and 3 (trial 1), weeks 7 and 9 (trial 2), or weeks 1, 4, 7, and 10 (trial 3). Immune assays were performed on peripheral-blood mononuclear cells collected before and after treatment. Results From 1998 to 2003, 131 patients with HLA-A2–positive were enrolled. With 60-month median follow-up time, the overall RR for 121 assessable patients was 16.5% (95% CI, 10% to 26%); the RRs were 23.8% in trial 1 (42 patients), 12.5% in trial 2 (40 patients), and 12.8% in trial 3 (39 patients). There were 11 CRs (9%) and nine partial responses (7%), with 11 patients (9%) progression free at ≥ 30 months. Immune studies including assays of CD3-ζ expression and numbers of CD4+/CD25+/FoxP3+ regulatory T cells, CD15+/CD11b+/CD14– immature myeloid-derived cells, and CD8+gp100 tetramer-positive cells in the blood did not correlate with clinical benefit. Conclusion The results again demonstrate efficacy of high-dose IL-2 in advanced melanoma but did not demonstrate the promising clinical activity reported with vaccine and high-dose IL-2 in any of three phase II trials.

scholarly journals Vandetanib (ZD6474) in the Treatment of Medullary Thyroid Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. CMO.S6197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hari Deshpande ◽  
Sanziana Roman ◽  
Jaykumar Thumar ◽  
Julie Ann Sosa
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Medullary Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Good Choice ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Medullary Thyroid

Vandetanib (ZD6474) is an orally bioavailable small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of multiple growth factor receptors, including RET (Rearrange during transfection), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The activity against RET and VEGF made it a good choice in the treatment of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). As there is considerable cross talk between growth factor pathways, dual inhibition with such agents has become an attractive strategy, in the treatment of many malignancies with encouraging Phase II clinical trial data to date. Vandetanib was tested in two Phase II trials in the treatment of patients with medullary thyroid cancer at doses of 100 mg and 300 mg daily respectively. The encouraging results of these 2 trials led to a randomized phase II trial comparing this medication to placebo using a crossover design. More than 300 patients were included in this study, which ultimately showed a significant improvement in progression-free survival in patients taking vandetanib. Based on these results, the Oncology Drug Advisory Committee (ODAC) of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommended that vandetanib be approved for the treatment of patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic medullary thyroid cancer.

scholarly journals PIONEER-Panc: a platform trial for phase II randomized investigations of new and emerging therapies for localized pancreatic cancer

BMC Cancer ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia E. Douglas ◽  
Suyu Liu ◽  
Junsheng Ma ◽  
Robert A. Wolff ◽  
Shubham Pant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Treatment History

Abstract Background Personalized and effective treatments for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) continue to remain elusive. Novel clinical trial designs that enable continual and rapid evaluation of novel therapeutics are needed. Here, we describe a platform clinical trial to address this unmet need. Methods This is a phase II study using a Bayesian platform design to evaluate multiple experimental arms against a control arm in patients with PDAC. We first separate patients into three clinical stage groups of localized PDAC (resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced disease), and further divide each stage group based on treatment history (treatment naïve or previously treated). The clinical stage and treatment history therefore define 6 different cohorts, and each cohort has one control arm but may have one or more experimental arms running simultaneously. Within each cohort, adaptive randomization rules are applied and patients will be randomized to either an experimental arm or the control arm accordingly. The experimental arm(s) of each cohort are only compared to the applicable cohort specific control arm. Experimental arms may be added independently to one or more cohorts during the study. Multiple correlative studies for tissue, blood, and imaging are also incorporated. Discussion To date, PDAC has been treated as a single disease, despite knowledge that there is substantial heterogeneity in disease presentation and biology. It is recognized that the current approach of single arm phase II trials and traditional phase III randomized studies are not well-suited for more personalized treatment strategies in PDAC. The PIONEER Panc platform clinical trial is designed to overcome these challenges and help advance our treatment strategies for this deadly disease. Trial registration This study is approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of MD Anderson Cancer Center, IRB-approved protocol 2020-0075. The PIONEER trial is registered at the US National Institutes of Health (ClinicalTrials.gov) NCT04481204.

Trabectedin (T) in relapsed advanced ovarian cancer (ROC): A pooled analysis of three phase II studies

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5579-5579 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. McMeekin ◽  
J. M. del Campo ◽  
N. Colombo ◽  
C. Krasner ◽  
A. Roszak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Weekly Schedule ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Phase Ii Studies

5579 Introduction: Trabectedin is a DNA minor groove binding drug with a distinct MoA under development in sarcoma, prostate, breast and ROC. We have performed a pooled analysis of efficacy and tolerability of all phase II trials with T as 2nd - 3rd line in ROC. Methods: Three Trabectedin schedules were investigated: two every 3weeks (q3w; A: 1.3 mg/m2 3-h or B: 1.5 mg/m2 24-h) and one weekly (C: 0.58 mg/m2 3-h ×3 q4w). Endpoints were response rate (RR), time to progression (TTP), response duration (RD) and safety. 294 patients from 3 phase II (one randomized A vs B) trials were included: 108 were resistant (R) and 186 sensitive (S) to last platinum, based on progression-free interval <6 months or longer.Results: Overall RR and median TTP were 8% and 2.1mo in R and 34% and 5.8 mo in S patients. Median RD was 5.8 m. Schedules A & B q3w showed significant better RR (33% vs 16%, p=<0.0001) and median TTP (5.8 vs 2.8 m, p=0.0001) than the weekly schedule C. No efficacy difference was seen between 3-h and 24-h q3wk. In patients with = 2 prior platinum-based regimens, RR (R:7% and S:37%) and median TTP (R: 2.5 m and S:6.3 m) were similar than patients with only 1 prior platinum [RR (R:9%; S:33%) and TTP (R: 2 m; S: 5.5 m)]. 1,404 cycles were delivered [median A: 5(1–23), B: 5(1–19), C: 3(1–22)], with similar dose intensity (mg/m2/wk) across regimens (0.38, 0.42, 0.39). Most common drug-related AEs of any grade by cycle were (A, B, C) fatigue: 38, 35, 63% and vomiting: 16, 27, 21%. Grade 3/4 lab abnormalities were non-cumulative neutropenia: 21, 28, 1% and ALT increase: 32, 26, 3%. Low incidence of febrile neutropenia, neurotoxicity, stomatitis and alopecia was seen regardless of schedule. Conclusions: Trabectedin as single agent has shown clinical activity in both R and, particularly in S ROC. Activity was fully retained in patients with =2 prior platinum lines. Trabectedin q3w schedules (with no difference between 3 and 24-h) showed higher efficacy than T weekly. Toxicities were manageable and non-cumulative. Trabectedin is a promising new drug for the treatment of ROC and is under evaluation in a phase III trial. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Continuous sunitinib treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A multicenter phase II trial (SAKK 77/06 and SASL 23)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4591-4591
Author(s):  
D. Koeberle ◽  
M. Montemurro ◽  
P. Samaras ◽  
P. Majno ◽  
M. Simcock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Liver Dysfunction ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Moderate Activity ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Best Response

4591 Background: Sunitinib (SU) is a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antitumor and antiangiogenetic activity. Evidence for clinical activity in HCC was reported in 2 phase II trials [Zhu et al and Faivre et al, ASCO 2007] using either a 37.5 or a 50 mg daily dose in a 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off regimen. The objective of this trial was to demonstrate antitumor activity of continuous SU treatment in patients (pts) with HCC. Methods: Key eligibility criteria included unresectable or metastatic HCC, no prior systemic anticancer treatment, measurable disease and Child-Pugh A or B liver dysfunction. Pts received 37.5 mg SU daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression free survival at 12 weeks (PFS12) defined as ‘success’ if the patient was alive and without tumor progression assessed by 12 weeks (± 7 days) after registration. A PFS12 of ≤ 20% was considered uninteresting and promising if ≥ 40%. Using the Simon-two minimax stage design with 90% power and 5% significance the sample size was 45 pts. Secondary endpoints included safety assessments, measurement of serum cobalamin levels and tumor density. Results: From September 2007 to August 2008 45 pts, mostly male (87%), were enrolled in 10 centers. Median age was 63 years, 89% had Child-Pugh A and 47% had distant metastases. Median largest lesion diameter was 84 mm (range: 18 - 280) and 18% had prior TACE. Reasons for stopping therapy were: PD 60%, symptomatic deterioration 16%, toxicity 11%, death 2% (due to tumor), and other reasons 4%; 7% remain on therapy. PFS12 was rated as success in 15 pts (33%) (95% CI: 20%, 49%) and failure in 27 (60%); 3 were not evaluable (due to refusal). Over the whole trial period 1 CR and 40% SD as best response were achieved. Median PFS, duration of disease stabilization, TTP and OS were 2.8, 3.2, 2.8 and 9.3 months, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were infrequent and all deaths due to the tumor. Conclusions: Continuous SU treatment with 37.5 mg/d daily is feasible and demonstrates moderate activity in pts with advanced HCC and mild to moderately impaired liver dysfunction. Under this trial design the therapy is considered promising (> 13 PFS12 successes). No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Cabozantinib As Salvage Therapy for Patients With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor–Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Phase II International Thyroid Oncology Group Trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (29) ◽  
pp. 3315-3321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria E. Cabanillas ◽  
Jonas A. de Souza ◽  
Susan Geyer ◽  
Lori J. Wirth ◽  
Michael E. Menefee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Differentiated Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Multikinase Inhibitor

Purpose Sorafenib and lenvatinib are oral multikinase inhibitors targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and approved for radioiodine (RAI)-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). However, there are no approved second- or third-line therapies. MET is implicated in resistance to VEGFR inhibitors. Cabozantinib is an oral multikinase inhibitor targeting MET in addition to VEGFR and is approved for medullary thyroid cancer. In a phase I study of cabozantinib, five of eight patients with DTC previously treated with a VEGFR-targeted therapy had an objective response to cabozantinib. Patients and Methods Patients with RAI-refractory disease with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) measurable disease and evidence of progression on prior VEGFR-targeted therapy were enrolled in this single-arm phase II study. The cabozantinib starting dose was 60 mg/day orally but could be escalated to 80 mg if the patient did not experience a response. Patients underwent tumor assessment according to RECIST v1.1 every 8 weeks. In this study, if at least five of 25 response-evaluable patients had an objective response, cabozantinib would be considered a promising agent in this patient population. Results Twenty-five patients were enrolled. The median age was 64 years, and 64% of patients were men. Twenty-one patients had received only one prior VEGFR-targeted therapy (sorafenib, pazopanib, or cediranib), and four patients had received two such therapies. The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue, weight loss, diarrhea, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, and hypertension. One drug-related death was noted. Of the 25 patients, 10 (40%) had a partial response, 13 (52%) had stable disease, and two (8%) had nonevaluable disease. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 12.7 months and 34.7 months, respectively. Conclusion Cabozantinib demonstrated clinically significant, durable objective response activity in patients with RAI-refractory DTC who experienced disease progression while taking prior VEGFR-targeted therapy.

scholarly journals Unconventional Anticancer Agents: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 136-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Vickers ◽  
Joyce Kuo ◽  
Barrie R. Cassileth
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Off Label

Purpose A substantial number of cancer patients turn to treatments other than those recommended by mainstream oncologists in an effort to sustain tumor remission or halt the spread of cancer. These unconventional approaches include botanicals, high-dose nutritional supplementation, off-label pharmaceuticals, and animal products. The objective of this study was to review systematically the methodologies applied in clinical trials of unconventional treatments specifically for cancer. Methods MEDLINE 1966 to 2005 was searched using approximately 200 different medical subject heading terms (eg, alternative medicine) and free text words (eg, laetrile). We sought prospective clinical trials of unconventional treatments in cancer patients, excluding studies with only symptom control or nonclinical (eg, immune) end points. Trial data were extracted by two reviewers using a standardized protocol. Results We identified 14,735 articles, of which 214, describing 198 different clinical trials, were included. Twenty trials were phase I, three were phase I and II, 70 were phase II, and 105 were phase III. Approximately half of the trials investigated fungal products, 20% investigated other botanicals, 10% investigated vitamins and supplements, and 10% investigated off-label pharmaceuticals. Only eight of the phase I trials were dose-finding trials, and a mere 20% of phase II trials reported a statistical design. Of the 27 different agents tested in phase III, only one agent had a prior dose-finding trial, and only for three agents was the definitive study initiated after the publication of phase II data. Conclusion Unconventional cancer treatments have not been subject to appropriate early-phase trial development. Future research on unconventional therapies should involve dose-finding and phase II studies to determine the suitability of definitive trials.

Design Issues of Randomized Phase II Trials and a Proposal for Phase II Screening Trials

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (28) ◽  
pp. 7199-7206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence V. Rubinstein ◽  
Edward L. Korn ◽  
Boris Freidlin ◽  
Sally Hunsberger ◽  
S. Percy Ivy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Targeted Treatment ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Treatment Control ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii

Future progress in improving cancer therapy can be expedited by better prioritization of new treatments for phase III evaluation. Historically, phase II trials have been key components in the prioritization process. There has been a long-standing interest in using phase II trials with randomization against a standard-treatment control arm or an additional experimental arm to provide greater assurance than afforded by comparison to historic controls that the new agent or regimen is promising and warrants further evaluation. Relevant trial designs that have been developed and utilized include phase II selection designs, randomized phase II designs that include a reference standard-treatment control arm, and phase II/III designs. We present our own explorations into the possibilities of developing “phase II screening trials,” in which preliminary and nondefinitive randomized comparisons of experimental regimens to standard treatments are made (preferably using an intermediate end point) by carefully adjusting the false-positive error rates (α or type I error) and false-negative error rates (β or type II error), so that the targeted treatment benefit may be appropriate while the sample size remains restricted. If the ability to conduct a definitive phase III trial can be protected, and if investigators feel that by judicious choice of false-positive probability and false-negative probability and magnitude of targeted treatment effect they can appropriately balance the conflicting demands of screening out useless regimens versus reliably detecting useful ones, the phase II screening trial design may be appropriate to apply.

scholarly journals Trends in Phase II Trials for Cancer Therapies

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
Faruque Azam ◽  
Alexei Vazquez
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Null Model ◽  
Surrogate Endpoint ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Drug Combinations ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cancer Drug ◽  
Cancer Therapies ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
Phase Ii Trials

Background: Drug combinations are the standard of care in cancer treatment. Identifying effective cancer drug combinations has become more challenging because of the increasing number of drugs. However, a substantial number of cancer drugs stumble at Phase III clinical trials despite exhibiting favourable efficacy in the earlier Phase. Methods: We analysed recent Phase II cancer trials comprising 2165 response rates to uncover trends in cancer therapies and used a null model of non-interacting agents to infer synergistic and antagonistic drug combinations. We compared our latest efficacy dataset with a previous dataset to assess the progress of cancer therapy. Results: Targeted therapies reach higher response rates when used in combination with cytotoxic drugs. We identify four synergistic and 10 antagonistic combinations based on the observed and expected response rates. We demonstrate that recent targeted agents have not significantly increased the response rates. Conclusions: We conclude that either we are not making progress or response rate measured by tumour shrinkage is not a reliable surrogate endpoint for the targeted agents.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document