scholarly journals Illuminating the Portfolio Assessment Process through a Qualitative Program Evaluation Approach

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 233-251
Author(s):  
Jin-Hee Lee
2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. e211-e215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margery H. Davis ◽  
Gominda G. Ponnamperuma

2004 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Naidoo

Many and varied methods of assessment are used to evaluate undergraduate physiotherapy students. Different modes of assessment occur as a result of contrasting educational theories and because the purpose of assessment is variable. In this era of performance assessment related to  the students’ mastery of the core curriculum, portfolios can enhance the assessment process by revealing a range of skills and understandings. This fits snugly into the physiotherapy curriculum for undergraduate continuous assessment purposes. Portfolio assessment can facilitate more reflection on students’ learning, more ownership of learning and more awareness of self-development. This supports the South African Qualifications Authority’s objective for higher education of reflection and life-long learning in our students. This article presents discussion on the use of portfolios in physiotherapy student learning and assessment in clinical practice.


2010 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 356-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J Heckman

This paper compares the structural approach to economic policy analysis with the program evaluation approach. It offers a third way to do policy analysis that combines the best features of both approaches. I illustrate the value of this alternative approach by making the implicit economics of LATE explicit, thereby extending the interpretability and range of policy questions that LATE can answer. (JEL C21, E61)


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Fazilla ◽  
Riandi Marisa

The purpose of this service is in order to share knowledge and experience in the form of seminars and workshops for school partners with regard to implementation of the alternatives assessment process which was implemented in primary schools. So that by applying an assessment that is expected to accommodate the function, purpose and principles of assessment and also provide additional information for teachers in designing an ideal alternative assessment. The asessmen which will be applied in this devotion is the assessment of the portfolio. This devotion is expected to have a high value of benefits both for proposing his own team, educators, students and the lesson itself. The targets of this devotion, namely; with the dedication is expected to be the subject of study and information for teachers as educators in formulating activities to increase the competence of teachers in elementary schools, which can be done through training, assessment and publishing technical reference and references associated with the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of teachers in carry out evaluation of learning by using portfolios, and can provide information reports on the results of this dedication to the principals in an effort to evaluate and improve the quality of the portfolio assessment program in the future.


2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Menchaca ◽  
Ellen S. Hoffman

With contemporary requirements for objective measurement, program evaluation is a certain necessity. Most program evaluation is designed in response to external demands for assessment. Moreover, such evaluation is typically developed only after programs already exist. However, the proliferation of online learning provides new opportunities for approaching evaluation. Specifically, many higher education institutions are currently augmenting existing campus-based programs with online learning—either by hybridizing traditional delivery or by providing parallel online options. At the University of Hawaii, while designing a parallel online delivery model for an existing campus-based program, careful consideration was given to the unique requirements for evaluation and assessment. In this way, an overall plan for evaluation was developed that incorporated multiple layers of assessment: from specific programmatic to internal university to external accreditation requirements. Commonalities among the multiple layers were considered to develop a single, overall evaluation approach. In a case study model, this paper describes eight practical steps taken to develop an overall, effective evaluation model.


1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 25-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjorie Heinzer ◽  
Janice M. Beitz ◽  
Heyward Michael Dreher ◽  
Marguerite S. Ambrose ◽  
Elaine R. Flynn ◽  
...  

1979 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl J. Dunst

Public Law 94-142 states that the impact of programs authorized under the Act be adequately evaluated. This article describes the evaluation requirements as delineated in the Act and specifies the type of evaluation that is necessary to meet the stated requirements. An experimental evaluation approach is recommended for assessing the efficacy of programs and projects operated under the Act. Examples of the use of quasi experimental designs for evaluative purposes are presented.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rezqan Noor Farid

The tendency of test maker and test developer in using conventional test items for students’ assessment fails the objective of the assessment itself since they do not represent activities students typically perform in classrooms. The alternative for this problem is portfolio assessment. Portfolio as a purposeful collection of students’ work that demonstrates their effort, progress, and achievements in given area can be used to measure the progress and achievement of students. This study is intended to reveal the significance of portfolio in assessing students’ achievements. This study is conducted using Ex Post Facto design with Causal Comparative approach. The research is conducted by choosing two classes of 10th grades in MAN 2 Martapura which used portfolio assessment and traditional assessment. The data are collected through observation and documentation consisting of number of the students, pre-test English score, and the score of final test. The result shows that the difference of assessment process the differences of student’s learning achievement between the two classes which use portfolio assessment and the class which use traditional assessment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document