scholarly journals Evaluation of the effectiveness of conventional sealant and glass-ionomer cement as a preventive sealing material for first permanent molars

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1355-1363
Author(s):  
Nedana Georgieva ◽  
Krasimir Hristov ◽  
Nataliya Grancharova
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Sealing Material ◽  
Permanent Molars ◽  
First Permanent Molars ◽  
Ionomer Cement

The Performance of First Molar Orthodontic Bands Cemented with Glass Ionomer Cement—A Retrospective Analysis

1992 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. T. Millett ◽  
P. H. Gordon
Keyword(s):  
Survival Time ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Permanent Molars ◽  
First Permanent Molars ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Various factors influencing the survival time of orthodontic bands cemented to first permanent molars with glass ionomer cement (KETAC-CEM, Espe) have been investigated. Data on 513 patients with 1424 first molar bands who completed orthodontic treatment between 1985 and 1989 inclusive were analysed. Performance of bands cemented to first permanent molars varied according to the operator, age of the patient and treatment mechanics, but not according to the sex of the patient or quadrant in which the band was fitted.

scholarly journals Effect of Bite Opening on the Correction of Dental Anterior Cross Bite – A Novel Approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (02) ◽  
pp. 107-112
Author(s):  
Abul Khair Zalan ◽  
◽  
Anser Maxood ◽  
Mohammad Haroon Dalili ◽  
Hira Zaman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Open Bite ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Anterior Open Bite ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Permanent Molars ◽  
First Permanent Molars ◽  
Ionomer Cement

OBJECTIVES: To correct dental origin anterior crossbite by placement of Glass Ionomer cement occlusal stops on mandibular first permanent molars for maximum of two weeks. METHODOLOGY: 16 patients (age: 7-11 years) with dental anterior crossbite were treated by placement of Glass Ionomer cement occlusal stops on mandibular first permanent molars for maximum of 2 weeks to create 1mm anterior open bite. The patients were then recalled after 1 month, 3 months and 6 months for follow up visits. Fisher’s exact test applied using SPSS version # 25. RESULTS: 13 out of 16 patients were treated successfully within two weeks of placement of occlusal stops. Follow-up at six months showed no relapse in any of the corrected cases. CONCLUSION: Placement of glass ionomer cement occlusal stops for two weeks on mandibular first permanent molars is an easy approach to correct dental anterior crossbite. KEYWORDS: Crossbite, Malocclusion, Glass ionomer cement, Corrective orthodontics

scholarly journals Retention evaluation of two glass ionomer cement sealants: six-month clinical follow-up

2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-308
Author(s):  
Alline FRAY ◽  
Thaís Manzano PARISOTTO ◽  
Gabriela Azevedo de Vasconcelos Cunha BONINI ◽  
Regina Maura Coli SIEGL ◽  
José Carlos Pettorossi IMPARATO
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Fissure Sealants ◽  
Pit And Fissure Sealants ◽  
Permanent Molars ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Sealant Retention ◽  
First Permanent Molars ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the retention of glass ionomer sealant, Vitro Molar(r) (DFL) and Ketac Molar Easy Mix(r) (3 m ESPE) as pit and fissure sealants on first permanent molars, fully or partially erupted. Methods: The study sample consisted of 412 molars, among 110 children. The sealant retention was evaluated after 6 months of the application. Results: The results were collected through digital photographs and the retention results were assessed by the following System: score 0 - total retention; score 1 - sealant present in more than 50% of the pit and fissure system; score 2 - sealant present in less than 50% of the pit and fissure system; score 3 - missing sealant. Regarding the presence of the sealants in less than 50% of the occlusal surface, lower percentages were found for the two materials used as follows: score score 2 - Vitro Molar(r) (9,52% examiner 1 and 11.9% examiner 2) and score 2 - Ketac Molar Easy Mix(r)(9.52% examiner 1 and 10.71% examiner 2). Approximately 90% of the teeth sealed with Ketac Molar Easy Mix(r)or Vitro Molar(r) presented total loss (score 3). Thus, there was no statistical difference between the materials and between the examiners (p>0.05). Conclusion: Therefore it was concluded that the sealant retention in the studied population was not satisfactory for any of the materials used.

Human amniotic membrane as therapeutic agent in pulpotomy of permanent molars

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. e243414
Author(s):  
Saumya Johri ◽  
Promila Verma ◽  
Rhythm Bains ◽  
Aseem Praksh Tikku
Keyword(s):  
Amniotic Membrane ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Permanent Teeth ◽  
Human Amniotic Membrane ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Present Case Report ◽  
Mandibular Molar ◽  
Permanent Molars ◽  
Irreversible Pulpitis ◽  
Ionomer Cement

A 22-year-old woman reported with a cariously exposed mandibular molar. Pulpotomy was planned rather than routine root canal treatment, which was otherwise indicated. Amniotic membrane (AM) that has been extensively researched in different fields of medicine was used as the pulpotomy agent. After gaining coronal access to the root orifices, bleeding was arrested and activated AM was placed over the root stumps. Glass ionomer cement(GIC) was placed over the membrane and temporary restoration was done. One week later, permanent restoration with composite resin was done. The patient’s symptoms resolved, and the tooth started responding normally to vitality tests at subsequent follow-ups. The present case report is an attempt to use human AM as a natural pulpotomy agent for treating irreversible pulpitis in permanent teeth. Understanding of innumerable beneficial properties of the AM and its application in preserving vitality of permanent teeth is the main learning objective.

scholarly journals Low-cost glass ionomer cement as ART sealant in permanent molars: a randomized clinical trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela HESSE ◽  
Clarissa Calil BONIFÁCIO ◽  
Camila de Almeida Brandão GUGLIELMI ◽  
Carolina da FRANCA ◽  
Fausto Medeiros MENDES ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Permanent Molars ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Clinical and Radiographic Study of Chemical-Mechanical Removal of Caries Using Papacárie: 24-Month Follow Up

2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
SK Bussadori ◽  
CC Guedes ◽  
JC Bachiega ◽  
TO Santis ◽  
LJ Motta
Keyword(s):  
Rio De Janeiro ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Radiographic Study ◽  
Mechanical Removal ◽  
Carious Lesions ◽  
Affected Tissue ◽  
Permanent Molars ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Background: The chemical-mechanical removal of caries involves the chemical softening of the infected dentin, following by the mechanical removal of the softened tissue using non-cutting manual instruments. Papacárie® (Fórmula&Ação, Sao Paulo, Brazil) is a product in gel form used for the chemical-mechanical softening of the affected tissue. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Papacárie®. Methods: Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed on 14 young permanent molars treated with Papacárie® and restored with glass ionomer cement (VitroMolar, DFL Ind. Com LTDA,Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) 24 months following intervention. Results: Success was achieved in 13 of the 14 cases. Conclusion: Papacárie® was effective in the treatment of carious lesions and constitutes a conservative alternative that offers benefits to patients.

Microleakage of class II restoration with zirconia inlay: An in vitro study

2019 ◽  
pp. 61-67
Author(s):  
Xuan Anh Ngoc Ho ◽  
Anh Chi Phan ◽  
Toai Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Ionomer Cement ◽  
Group 1 ◽  
Composite Restoration

Background: Class II restoration with zirconia inlay is concerned by numerous studies about the luting coupling between zirconia inlay and teeth. The present study was performed to evaluate the microleakage of Class II zirconia inlayusing two different luting agents and compare to direct restoration using bulk fill composite. Aims: To evaluate the microleakage of Class II restorations using three different techniques. Materials and methods: The study was performed in laboratory with three groups. Each of thirty extracted human teeth was prepared a class II cavity with the same dimensions, then these teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups restored by 3 different approaches. Group 1: zirconia inlay cemented with self-etch resin cement (Multilink N); Group 2: zirconia inlay cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji Plus); Group 3: direct composite restoration using bulk fill composite(Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill). All restorations were subjected to thermal cycling (100 cycles 50C – 55 0C), then immersed to 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours. The microleakage determined by the extent of dye penetration along the gingival wall was assessed using two methods: quantitative and semi-quantitative method. Results: Among three types of restorations, group 1 demonstrated the significantly lower rate of leakage compared to the others, while group 2 and 3 showed no significant difference. Conclusion: Zirconia inlay restoration cemented with self-etch resin cement has least microleakage degree when compare to class II zirconia inlay restoration cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and direct composite restoration using bulk fill composite. Key words: inlay, zirconia ceramic, class II restoration, microleakage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document