scholarly journals Outcomes following abdominoperineal resection 6 years retrospective study at a rural district general hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 665
Author(s):  
Deeksha Arora ◽  
Michael Tang ◽  
Thomas Seddon ◽  
Milind Rao
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Perineal Wound ◽  
Biological Mesh ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Patient Factors ◽  
Mesh Group ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: A range of surgical techniques are used for perineal wound closure following Abdominoperineal Excision of the Rectum (APER). The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of using a biological mesh for perineal wound closure and to compare the outcomes following conventional suture and mesh closure of the perineal wound.Methods: A single-centre retrospective study of a cohort of patients undergoing surgery for low rectal cancer between January 2013 and December 2018. Patient records were analysed for outcomes including perineal complication rates, length of hospital stay and impact of patient factors on complication rates in mesh vs no mesh group.Results: Of the total 43 patients included in the study, 13 (30%) had a conventional perineal closure whereas 30 patients (70%) had a biological mesh reconstruction.  Early perineal wound complications were seen in 21/43 (49%) patients. Of those, 6 (29%) patients were in the no mesh group compared to 15 (71%) patients in the mesh group (p = 0.81). 84% of the patients who received neo adjuvant radiotherapy (NART) developed perineal wound infection. There was no statistically significant difference in the mesh and no mesh groups. None of the patient factors, other than preoperative anaemia, had a statistically significant association with the rate of complications in either of the groups.Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference in the complication rate between primary and biological mesh closure. Biological mesh is safe for perineal reconstruction following APER.

scholarly journals Successful surgical closure of infected abdominal wounds following preconditioning with negative pressure wound therapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna C. Wagner ◽  
Anja Wetz ◽  
Armin Wiegering ◽  
Johan F. Lock ◽  
Stefan Löb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Skin Closure ◽  
Wound Treatment ◽  
Open Wound ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Open Wound Treatment

Abstract Purpose Traditionally, previous wound infection was considered a contraindication to secondary skin closure; however, several case reports describe successful secondary wound closure of wounds “preconditioned” with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). Although this has been increasingly applied in daily practice, a systematic analysis of its feasibility has not been published thus far. The aim of this study was to evaluate secondary skin closure in previously infected abdominal wounds following treatment with NPWT. Methods Single-center retrospective analysis of patients with infected abdominal wounds treated with NPWT followed by either secondary skin closure referenced to a group receiving open wound therapy. Endpoints were wound closure rate, wound complications (such as recurrent infection or hernia), and perioperative data (such as duration of NPWT or hospitalization parameters). Results One hundred ninety-eight patients during 2013–2016 received a secondary skin closure after NPWT and were analyzed and referenced to 67 patients in the same period with open wound treatment after NPWT. No significant difference in BMI, chronic immunosuppressive medication, or tobacco use was found between both groups. The mean duration of hospital stay was 30 days with a comparable duration in both patient groups (29 versus 33 days, p = 0.35). Interestingly, only 7.7% of patients after secondary skin closure developed recurrent surgical site infection and in over 80% of patients were discharged with closed wounds requiring only minimal outpatient wound care. Conclusion Surgical skin closure following NPWT of infected abdominal wounds is a good and safe alternative to open wound treatment. It prevents lengthy outpatient wound therapy and is expected to result in a higher quality of life for patients and reduce health care costs.

scholarly journals Total arterial myocardial revascularization using bilateral internal mammary arteries and the role of postoperative sternal stabilization to reduce wound infections in a large cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Albert ◽  
Ragi Nagib ◽  
Adrian Ursulescu ◽  
Ulrich F W Franke
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Internal Mammary Artery ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
Myocardial Revascularization ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Wound Infections ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Mammary Arteries ◽  
Internal Mammary

Abstract OBJECTIVES Total arterial myocardial revascularization using bilateral internal mammary arteries shows improved results for mortality, long-term survival and superior graft patency. It has become the standard technique according to recent guidelines. However, these patients may have an increased risk of developing sternal wound infections, especially obese patients or those with diabetes. One reason for the wound complications may be early sternum instability. This situation could be avoided by using a thorax support vest (e.g. Posthorax® vest). This retrospective study compared the wound complications after bilateral internal mammary artery grafting including the use of a Posthorax vest. METHODS Between April 2015 and May 2017, 1613 patients received total arterial myocardial revascularization using bilateral internal mammary artery via a median sternotomy. The Posthorax support vest was used from the second postoperative day. We compared those patients with 1667 patients operated on via the same access in the preceding 26 months. The end points were the incidence of wound infections, when the wound infection occurred and how many wound revisions were needed until wound closure. RESULTS The demographic data of both groups were similar. A significant advantage for the use of a thorax support vest could be seen regarding the incidence of wound infections (P = 0.036) and the length of hospital stay when a wound complication did occur (P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS As seen in this retrospective study, the early perioperative use of a thorax stabilization vest, such as the Posthorax vest, can reduce the incidence of sternal wound complications significantly. Furthermore, when a wound infection occurred, and the patient returned to the hospital for wound revision, patients who were given the Posthorax vest postoperatively had a significantly shorter length of stay until wound closure.

scholarly journals A comparison of screw versus drill and curettage epiphysiodesis to correct leg-length discrepancy

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 509-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Troy ◽  
B. Shore ◽  
P. Miller ◽  
S. Mahan ◽  
D. Hedequist ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Operative Time ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Leg Length Discrepancy ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Leg Length ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Length Discrepancy ◽  
Baseline Activity ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose To compare two common surgical techniques of epiphysiodesis: drill/curettage epiphysiodesis (PDED) versus cross screw epiphysiodesis (PETS). The hypothesis is that the two techniques have similar efficacy but demonstrate differences in length of hospital stay (LOS), time to return to activity and complication rates. Methods A retrospective review of growing children and adolescents less than 18 years old who required an epiphysiodesis with leg-length discrepancy (LLD) of 2 cm to 6 cm with minimum two years of follow-up was conducted. Characteristics including age at surgery, gender, epiphysiodesis location, side, operative time, LOS and hardware removal were compared across treatment groups. LLD, expected growth remaining (EGR) and bone age were determined preoperatively and at most-recent visit. The correction ratio (change in EGR) was calculated along with a 95% confidence interval (CI) to assess if correction in leg length was achieved. Results A total of 115 patients underwent epiphysiodesis in the femur (53%), tibia (24%) or a combination (24%). The cohort was 47% male, with a mean age of 12.6 years (7.7 to 17.7) at surgery. Median follow-up was 3.7 years (2.0 to 12.7). In all, 23 patients underwent PETS and 92 patients had PDED. Both treatment groups achieved expected LLD correction. There was no significant difference in median operative time, complication rates or LOS. PETS patients returned to activity at a mean 1.4 months (interquartile range (IQR) 0.7 to 2.1) while PDED patients returned at a mean 2.4 months (IQR 1.7 to 3) (p < 0.001). Conclusion Effectiveness in achieving expected correction, LOS and operative time are similar between screw and drill/curettage epiphysiodesis. Patients undergoing PETS demonstrated a faster return to baseline activity than patients with PDED. Level of Evidence: III

Perineal Wound Closure Using Biological Mesh Following Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naseer Baloch ◽  
Per J. Nilsson ◽  
Caroline Nordenvall ◽  
Mirna Abraham-Nordling
Keyword(s):  
Wound Closure ◽  
Perineal Wound ◽  
Abdominoperineal Excision ◽  
Biological Mesh ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Perineal Reconstruction ◽  
Primary Rectal Cancer ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Electronic Hospital

Aims: This study aimed to describe the short-term perineal healing rates in patients with perineal reconstruction using a biological mesh following extralevator abdominoperineal excision (elAPE). Methods: In a retrospective, descriptive single-centre cohort study, 88 consecutive patients treated with elAPE and perineal closure using a biological mesh between January 2011 and December 2015 were reviewed. All available data from electronic hospital records was collected. Patients were followed for 1 year following surgery and perineal wound status assessed at 3 months and at 1 year. Results: In total, 63 patients were male and all but 8 patients were treated for primary rectal cancer. All patients but 3 had received radiotherapy prior to surgery. Multivisceral excisions were performed in 19 patients. Omentoplasty was performed in 55 patients and 3 different types of meshes were used during the study period. At 3 months, 58 patients (66%) had a healed perineum. No association was detected between patient, tumour or perioperative characteristics and perineal wound status at 3 months. At 1 year, 4 patients were deceased and among the remaining 84, the perineal wound was healed in 77 patients (92%). Conclusion: The use of biological meshes in perineal reconstruction following elAPE is feasible and safe, and the perineal wound is healed in the majority of the patients within 3 months.

scholarly journals Complications Associated with Triple Arthrodesis Versus Non-Fusion Flatfoot Reconstruction: A Matched Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0039
Author(s):  
William V. Probasco ◽  
Benjamin E. Stein ◽  
Cyrus Fassihi ◽  
Lea McDaniel
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complication ◽  
Multivariate Regression ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Triple Arthrodesis ◽  
Total Cost ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Reconstruction Group

Category: Hindfoot; Midfoot/Forefoot; Other Introduction/Purpose: Pes planovalgus is a very common deformity of the foot, often resulting from adult acquired flatfoot disorder (AAFD). This deformity in its early stages is treated conservatively with non-operatively modalities such as bracing, however in its later stages often requires surgical correction of the deformity in order to improve the pain and function of the extremity. Two commonly performed procedures in the correction of this type of deformity are a triple arthrodesis or joint sparing flatfoot reconstruction. The objective of this study was to identify whether differences existed in the financial burden or complication rates of non-fusion flatfoot reconstruction versus triple arthrodesis. Methods: The PearlDiver Database was queried from 2006-2013 to identify all Medicare patients who were admitted for a triple arthrodesis or non-fusion flatfoot reconstruction. 2308 patients were identified in each cohort and statistically matched in a 1:1 manner to control for influence of demographics and/or comorbidities. Postoperative complication rates (within 30 days) were evaluated and broken down into major (PE/DVT, MI, CVA, sepsis, mortality, nerve injury) and minor (UTI, PNA, hardware failure, transfusion, wound complications) categories. Additionally, total cost of care including cost of readmissions, and readmission within 30 days were evaluated. Results: No significant differences were noted in the postoperative complication rates between the two procedures within the first 30 days post-operatively in the initial univariate regression. There was a significant difference in the rate of 30 day readmission with 2.3% of triple arthrodeses being readmitted vs. 1.08% in the non-fusion joint reconstruction group (p=.002). Adjusted multivariate regression yielded similar results, with no significant differences in postoperative complication rates. The difference in readmission rate remained significant in the multivariate regression (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.33-3.51, p=.002). Significant differences were also noted for mean total cost of care, with a higher mean total cost identified for the fusion group (x=7,868.0) compared to the reconstruction group (x=4,064.49, p<.001, Adjusted 𝛽𝛽 3,836.71, 95% CI 3,525.23 to 4,148.19, p<.001). Conclusion: This study compared triple arthrodesis versus joint-sparing flatfoot reconstruction. Within this study group there was no difference in complications between the two procedures. There was a significantly higher incidence of 30-day readmission in the triple arthrodesis group by about 2-fold. When comparing the total cost of care, there was a significantly higher cost associated with the triple arthrodesis, which cost on average about $3800 more than joint sparing flatfoot reconstruction. While revealing with regard to the aforementioned variables within the first 30 days post-operatively, further research needs to be conducted on the long term outcomes of these procedures. [Table: see text][Table: see text][Table: see text]

Barbed and conventional sutures in spinal surgery patients: an economic and clinical outcomes comparison

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (Sup5a) ◽  
pp. S9-S20
Author(s):  
Stephen S Johnston ◽  
Brian Po-Han Chen ◽  
Giovanni A Tommaselli ◽  
Simran Jain ◽  
John B Pracyk
Keyword(s):  
Operating Room ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Spinal Surgery ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
Index Admission ◽  
Barbed Suture ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Barbed Sutures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Suture Group

Objective: To compare economic and clinical outcomes of barbed sutures versus conventional sutures alone in wound closure for patients undergoing spinal surgery. Method: A retrospective study using the Premier Healthcare Database. The database was searched for patients who underwent elective inpatient spinal surgery (fusion or laminectomy) for a spinal disorder between 1 January 2014 and 30 June 2018 (first=index admission). Using billing records for medical supplies used during the index admission, patients were classified into mutually-exclusive groups: patients with any use of STRATAFIX (Ethicon, US) knotless tissue control devices (barbed sutures group); or patients with use of conventional sutures alone (conventional sutures group). Outcomes included the index admission's length of stay, total and subcategories of hospital costs, non-home discharge, operating room time (ORT, minutes), wound complications and readmissions within ≤90 days. Propensity score matching and generalised estimating equations were used to compare outcomes between the study groups. Results: After matching, 3705 patients were allocated to each group (mean age=61.5 years [standard deviation, SD±12.9]; 54% were females). Compared with the conventional suture group, the barbed suture group had significantly lower mean ORT (239±117 minutes, versus 263±79 minutes conventional sutures, p=0.015). Operating room costs were also siginificantly lower in the barbed suture group ($6673±$3976 versus $7100±$2700 conventional sutures, p=0.020). Differences were statistically insignificant for other outcomes (all p>0.05). Subanalysis of patients undergoing fusions of ≥2 vertebral joints yielded consistent results. Conclusion: In this study, wound closure incorporating barbed sutures was associated with lower ORT and operating room costs, with no significant difference in wound complications or readmissions, when compared with conventional sutures alone.

Anatomically Contoured Anterior Plating for Isolated Tibiotalar Arthrodesis: A Systematic Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 352-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Kusnezov ◽  
John C. Dunn ◽  
Logan R. Koehler ◽  
Justin D. Orr
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Posttraumatic Arthritis ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Tibiotalar Arthrodesis ◽  
Anterior Plating

Introduction. We performed a systematic review of the published literature to characterize patient demographic, surgical techniques, and functional outcomes to elucidate the complication and revision rates following isolated tibiotalar arthrodesis with anatomically contoured anterior plating. Methods. A comprehensive literature search was performed. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed studies in English, after 1990, at least 10 patients, and reporting clinical outcomes following contoured anterior plating and with follow-up of at least 80% and 1 year. Primary outcomes were fusion rate, time to fusion, return to activities, satisfaction, and functional outcome scores. Complication rates, reoperation, and revision were also extracted. Results. Eight primary studies with 164 patients met the inclusion criteria. The average sample size was 21 ± 10.0 patients and average age was 49.2 years with 61.6% male. Posttraumatic arthritis (49.4%) was the most common operative indication, followed by primary osteoarthrosis (18.9%). The average follow-up was 21.1 months. At this time, 97.6% of patients went on to uneventful union at a weighted average time of 18.7 weeks postoperatively. AOFAS scores improved significantly ( P < .05). 25% complication rate was reported with wound complication (7.9%) and hardware irritation (6.7%) most common. Overall, 21.3% of patients underwent reoperation; 4 for revision arthrodesis following nonunion. Conclusion. Isolated tibiotalar arthrodesis utilizing anatomically contoured anterior plating demonstrates excellent clinical and functional outcomes at short-term follow-up. Overall, 97.6% of patients went on to fusion and functional outcomes consistently improved following surgery. Furthermore, while one-quarter of patients experienced complications, wound complications were relatively uncommon and less than one-quarter of these required surgical intervention. Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Systematic Review

scholarly journals Lumbar microdiscectomy complication rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. E6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. Shriver ◽  
Jack J. Xie ◽  
Erik Y. Tye ◽  
Benjamin P. Rosenbaum ◽  
Varun R. Kshettry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Nerve Root ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Nerve Root Injury ◽  
Lumbar Microdiscectomy ◽  
Root Injury

OBJECT Lumbar microdiscectomy and its various minimally invasive surgical techniques are seeing increasing popularity, but a systematic review of their associated complications has yet to be performed. The authors sought to identify all prospective clinical studies reporting complications associated with lumbar open microdiscectomy, microendoscopic discectomy (MED), and percutaneous microdiscectomy. METHODS The authors conducted MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase database searches for randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies reporting complications associated with open, microendoscopic, or percutaneous lumbar microdiscectomy. Studies with fewer than 10 patients and published before 1990 were excluded. Overall and interstudy median complication rates were calculated for each surgical technique. The authors also performed a meta-analysis of the reported complications to assess statistical significance across the various surgical techniques. RESULTS Of 9504 articles retrieved from the databases, 42 met inclusion criteria. Most studies screened were retrospective case series, limiting the number of studies that could be included. A total of 9 complication types were identified in the included studies, and these were analyzed across each of the surgical techniques. The rates of any complication across the included studies were 12.5%, 13.3%, and 10.8% for open, MED, and percutaneous microdiscectomy, respectively. New or worsening neurological deficit arose in 1.3%, 3.0%, and 1.6% of patients, while direct nerve root injury occurred at rates of 2.6%, 0.9%, and 1.1%, respectively. Hematoma was reported at rates of 0.5%, 1.2%, and 0.6%, respectively. Wound complications (infection, dehiscence, orseroma) occurred at rates of 2.1%, 1.2%, and 0.5%, respectively. The rates of recurrent disc complications were 4.4%, 3.1%, and 3.9%, while reoperation was indicated in 7.1%, 3.7%, and 10.2% of operations, respectively. Meta-analysis calculations revealed a statistically significant higher rate of intraoperative nerve root injury following percutaneous procedures relative to MED. No other significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS This review highlights complication rates among various microdiscectomy techniques, which likely reflect real-world practice and conceptualization of complications among physicians. This investigation sets the framework for further discussions regarding microdiscectomy options and their associated complications during the informed consent process.

scholarly journals Analysis of Outcomes in Adolescents and Young Adults With Pilonidal Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mackenzie N. Abraham ◽  
Steven L. Raymond ◽  
Russell B. Hawkins ◽  
Atif Iqbal ◽  
Shawn D. Larson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Pilonidal Disease ◽  
Wound Complication ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Secondary Healing ◽  
Age And Sex

Purpose: Numerous definitive surgical techniques exist for the treatment of pilonidal disease with varied recurrence rates and wound complications. Due to the wide array of techniques and lack of consensus on the best approach, we proposed to study our experience treating pilonidal disease in adolescents and young adults.Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients 10–24 years old treated at a tertiary medical center from 2011 to 2016. Data including demographics, management, and outcomes were collected and analyzed. Primary outcome was recurrence of disease.Results: One hundred and thirty three patients with pilonidal disease underwent operative management. Fifty one percent underwent primary closure and 49% healed by secondary intention with no significant difference in recurrence rates (primary 18%, secondary 11%; p = 0.3245). Secondary healing patients had significantly lower wound complication rates (primary 51%, secondary 23%; p = 0.0012). After accounting for sex, race, weight, and operative technique, age was predictive of disease recurrence with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.706 (0.560–0.888; p = 0.003). Age and sex were both predictive of wound complications. Older patients had decreased risk of wound complication (adjusted OR 0.806, 95% CI 0.684–0.951; p = 0.0105), and male patients had increased risk of wound complication (adjusted OR 2.902, 95% CI 1.001–8.409; p = 0.0497).Conclusion: In summary, there is no significant difference in the recurrence rates between operative techniques for pilonidal disease. Older patients have decreased risk of recurrence following intervention. Wound complication rates are lower in patients undergoing secondary healing, though this may be better explained by differences in age and sex. Additional research investigating newer, minimally-invasive techniques needs to be pursued.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document