scholarly journals Comparison of the surgical and post-operative outcomes between single incision laparoscopic appendicectomy (cross triangulation method) with normal conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pratheep Samraj Rajendran Paulraj ◽  
Kiran Kailas Chirayil ◽  
Renuka Jayakumar Bellasindhi ◽  
Punitha Thetraravu Oli ◽  
Mohith Mathew ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Recovery Time ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendicectomy ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Conversion Rates ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Operative Recovery

Background: The usual multiport conventional laparoscopic surgeries (appendicectomy) are now being replaced by single incision laparoscopic surgeries (appendicectomy).In our study various aspects of SILS in comparison with the multiport conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy such as incision site pain, duration of surgery, morbidity and instruments used are discussed, duration of surgery, morbidity and instruments used are discussed.Methods: A single blinded randomized control trial was done on patients presenting with acute appendicitis. Pain numerical scale, use of analgesics, time to return to routine activities, hospital re-admission, complication like port site infection, hernia, intra operative complications rates, conversion rates and duration of surgery were evaluated. Various statistics of pain and other parameters are studied and evaluated. The mean operation time, mean recovery time, post-operative pain were statistically analysed using unpaired t-test. Results: Mean operating time was 44.16 minutes for SILS and 26.88 minutes for laparoscopic appendicectomy. The mean operative pain in scale of 1 to 4 was 1.40 and 0.40 for SILS and for laparoscopic appendicenctomy respectively making SILS more pain free and comfortable for the patient. The mean post-operative recovery time was 3.12 days for SILS and 7.88 days for laparoscopic appendicenctomy giving SILS patients more rapid recovery and resumption of work.  Conclusions: SILS offers better cosmetic outcome, lesser post-operative pain and shorter duration of hospital stay compared to classical 3 port conventional laparoscopic surgery but at the expense of time. Operative difficulties along with time constraint need to be overcome by the surgeon.

scholarly journals COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF POST-OPERATIVE PAIN BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY & SINGLE INCISION LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Kumar ◽  
Ashok Kaundal ◽  
Suneet Katoch
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
P Value ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

AIM: Comparative analysis of post-operative pain between Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Method: Patients suffering from symptomatic cholelithasis were randomly subjected to Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional four ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (cLC). Data analyzed included duration of surgery, post-operative pain, For assessment of post-operative pain numeric pain scale scoring system was used and pain scoring done at four hours, twelve hours and twenty-four hours post-operatively. Results: The study included fifty patients operated upon from June, 2014 to May, 2014. Twenty-five patients were subjected to SILC and rest of the twenty-five underwent cLC. Pre-operative characteristics of two groups were similar and there was no significant difference between two groups based on age, sex and Body Mass Index. Post-operative pain score was higher for cLC compared to SILC at four, twelve and twenty-four hours post-operatively. The mean pain score at four hours was 4.64 ± 1.89 for SILC versus 7.72 ± 0.84 for cLC (p-value < 0.0001). While the score at twelve and twenty-four hours were 2.96 ± 1.88 and 1.80 ± 1.44 for SILC compared to 5.08 ± 1.15 and 3.80 ± 1.11 for cLC respectively. Conclusion: SILC is superior to cLC compared to post-operative pain as per our study. Keywords: SILC, cLC, post-operative pain

scholarly journals Comparison of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional laparoscopic instrument: a prospective observational study

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 514
Author(s):  
Samir Deolekar ◽  
Bhushankumar A. Thakur ◽  
Bhushan Jajoo ◽  
Parnika R. Shinde
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Operative Blood Loss ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
The Mean

Background: Laparoscopic surgery is one of the most significant surgical advances of twentieth century. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is criterion standard for the treatment of benign gall bladder diseases, and it is the most common laparoscopic surgery worldwide. The aim of the study was to compare the intra-operative and post-operative complication, conversion rate and outcome of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on short term follow up.Methods: This prospective analytical observational design study was carried out in Tertiary Health care centre.  As per convenience sampling 60 consecutive patients of cholelithiasis. Data obtained was analyzed and inferences were drawn regarding the outcomes of the SILC in terms of cosmesis, post-operative pain and any other complications and compare the outcomes against the conventional four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Results: In our study we found the mean operating time for SILC was 90.5±16.37 minutes, whereas the mean operating time for CLC was 74±17.83 (p = 0.0004). Intra-operative blood loss for SILC and CLC was comparable and statistically insignificant. Pain in the SILC group was found to be significantly low than CLC group (p ≤0.0001).  The median cosmetic scale score for SILC group was 20 with range 13-21 and in conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy group it was 16 with range 12-18 (p <0.0001).Conclusions: The major advantage of SILC is cosmetic satisfaction, while the disadvantages of SILS are longer operative time. There was no statistically significant difference in the intra-operative blood loss and conversion rate, and complications in both the techniques. Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) was developed with the aim of reducing the invasiveness of traditional laparoscopy.

scholarly journals A comparative study between single incision multiport laparoscopic appendicectomy and conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy in tertiary care hospital, Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu, India

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 1176
Author(s):  
Dhinesh Babu K. ◽  
Sujith Kumar S.
Keyword(s):  
Tamil Nadu ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendicectomy ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopy ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Laparoscopy Group ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopy ◽  
Post Operative Pain

Background: To compare the outcome of single incision multiport laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy in terms of patient recovery time, post-operative pain in Karpaga Vinayaga Medical College and Hospital, Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu, India.Methods: A randomized control study was done by alternation with sample size of 50 which divided into two groups (study group 25 and control group 25) and study period is from August 2012 to September 2014.Results: Patient in single incision laparoscopy group show less post-operative pain in the first 6 and 12 hours compared to the conventional laparoscopy group, but no difference was noticed between the two groups after 24 hours. No significant difference in operating times was noted between the procedures.Conclusions: One patient in 25 who underwent single incision laparoscopy had wound infection, but no wound complications were noted in the conventional appendicectomy group.  Patients underwent Single incision laparoscopy are happier with scar when compared with conventional laparoscopy group. No difference noted in the duration of post-operative hospital stay.

Uterine Isthmus Tourniquet during Abdominal Myomectomy: Support or Hazard? A Randomized Double-Blind Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. 396-404
Author(s):  
Abolfazl Mehdizadehkashi ◽  
Kobra Tahermanesh ◽  
Samaneh Rokhgireh ◽  
Vahideh Astaraei ◽  
Zahra Najmi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Ovarian Reserve ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Massive Hemorrhage ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Abdominal Myomectomy ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
The Mean

<b><i>Background and Objectives:</i></b> A tourniquet has been suggested as a useful means of reducing massive hemorrhage during myomectomy. However, it is not clear whether the restricted perfusion affects the ovaries. In the present study, we examined the effect of a tourniquet on ovarian reserve and blood loss during myomectomy. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> In a randomized double-blind clinical trial, fertile nonobese patients scheduled for abdominal myomectomy at Rasool-e-Akram Hospital from February 2018 to June 2019 were randomized to a tourniquet (<i>n</i> = 46) or a non-tourniquet group (<i>n</i> = 35). Serum levels of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) were measured before and 3 months after surgery, blood loss was recorded during surgery, and serum levels of hemoglobin (Hb) were recorded before surgery, 6 h and 3 days after surgery. SPSS version 21 was used for statistical analysis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Demographic, obstetric, and myoma characteristics were similar in the 2 groups (<i>p</i> &#x3e; 0.05). The mean baseline values of AMH and FSH did not differ between groups (<i>p</i> &#x3e; 0.05). After surgery, only FSH was higher in the control group (<i>p</i> = 0.043). Despite the time taken to fasten and open the tourniquet, the mean operating time was shorter in the tourniquet group (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). Blood loss was higher in the control group (<i>p</i> = 0.005). The drop in Hb levels at 6 h after surgery was higher in the non-tourniquet group (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Blood loss was significantly associated with the duration of surgery (<i>r</i> = 0.523, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The use of a tourniquet during abdominal myomectomy significantly reduced the mean volume of blood loss compared to the non-tourniquet group, while it did not prolong the duration of surgery, nor reduced the ovarian reserve. A tourniquet is a safe and efficient measure during abdominal myomectomy.

scholarly journals Desarda’s versus Lichtenstein technique of inguinal hernia repair

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 92
Author(s):  
Obaid Syed
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
The Mean

Background: Ideal method for modern hernia surgery should be simple, cost effective, safe, tension free and permanent. The Lichtenstein operation to a great extent achieves this entire goal. The Lichtenstein mesh repair is associated with complications, postoperative dysfunction and high cost composite meshes. Desarda's technique, became a new surgical option for tissue-based inguinal hernia repair. The present study was designed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and complications of the Desarda’s repair with Lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair for treatment of inguinal hernia in a developing country.Methods: 200 patients with unilateral, primary, reducible inguinal hernia were selected. Included patients were randomly divided into two groups. Studied parameters were Duration of surgery, intra operative complications, post-operative Pain, Duration of hospital stay, return to normal activities, post-operative complications and recurrences.Results: There were a total of 100 patients each group. There was no statistically significant difference in duration of surgery and complication rate between the two groups. Difference in mean VAS was not statistically significant. The mean hospital stay in Desarda’s technique was 2.5 days while it was 2.6 days in Lichtenstein’s group. The mean time to return to basic physical activity in the Desarda’s technique was 12.6 days while it was 13.3 days in the Lichtenstein’s group. There were no recurrences in either group. Chronic inguinal pain (>1month) was more frequent in Lichtenstein’s group.Conclusions: There is no significant difference in duration of surgery, intra operative complication rate, post-operative pain, complications and recurrence, between Desarda’s technique and Lichtenstein’s technique. However chronic inguinal pain is less in Desarda’s technique. Desarda’s repair must be considered in young patients (<30 years). Its long-term efficacy needs to be studied with larger, prospective double-blind randomized trials, with longer follow-up.

scholarly journals Comparison between dissection method and coblation technique in tonsillectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 1607
Author(s):  
Shreyas S. Joshi ◽  
Vinayak Raikar
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Tonsillitis ◽  
P Value ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Operative Recovery ◽  
Dissection Technique ◽  
Cold Dissection ◽  
Dissection Method

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The objective of the present study was to compare the dissection method and coblation technique in tonsillectomy in patients of chronic tonsillitis.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This is prospective study in which 40 patients of chronic tonsillitis in age group of 5-12 years were selected in this study. Patients were blinded with regards to technique used to remove tonsils. 20 patients underwent tonsillectomy by cold dissection method and 20 with coblation method. In both techniques, duration of surgery and amount of blood loss were recorded and compared.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> In our study, the mean operative time from giving incision to achieving complete haemostasis for dissection method was 42.9 minutes and that for coblation technique was 34 minutes. The amount of blood lost on an average by dissection method was 51.8 ml, and by coblation technique was 22.3 ml. This difference was found to be statistically significant. Pain was evaluated by visual analogue scale. The data recorded from two groups was put to statistical analysis and ‘p’ value was calculated using independent t-test. The mean pain score for coblation technique averaged over 10 days was 2.72 and was 4.84 for dissection technique.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> We can conclude that coblation tonsillectomy is an easy to learn safe procedure with significant advantages in terms improving the quality of post-operative recovery compared to that following the cold dissection technique. But cost effectiveness of dissection method outweighs benefits of coblation at present in Indian scenario.</p>

scholarly journals DURATION OF SURGERY OF LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY -AN INITIAL EXPERIENCE IN IGMC, SHIMLA

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhartendu Nagesh ◽  
D.K Verma ◽  
R S Jhobta ◽  
Sanjiv Sharma ◽  
Mehar Chand
Keyword(s):  
Operating Time ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Laparoscopic Nephrectomy ◽  
P Value ◽  
Dense Adhesion ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Gandhi Medical College ◽  
Hydronephrotic Kidney

Background: Laparoscopic nephrectomy has been established as the standard of care for the management of benign non-functioning kidneys and has gained worldwide popularity over the past decade. Methods- This study was conducted in the Department of General surgery, Indira Gandhi medical college, Shimla on 20 selected patients of benign non functional kidney admitted for elective Laparoscopic Nephrectomy between July 2018 to June 2019 Results: In this study, the mean operating time in success full laparoscopic nephrectomies was 103.7 + 20.6 min in lap converted to open it was    165 .7 +26.99 min and in hand-assisted tame taken was 150 min which is statically not significant with p value =0.1317. Conclusion: The mean time taken for completion of laparoscopic nephrectomy in first 4 cases was 105 min and in next 4 cases was 108 min and in last 4 cases it was 97 min there was definitive learning curve as in last 4 cases operating time was less as compared to initial cases but operating time also depends on other factors like in hydronephrotic kidney due to well maintained plane dissection take less time ,but in  pyonephrotic kidney ,tubercular kidney,previously intervension like PCN, there were dense adhesion resulting in more time for disection. Keywords: Laparoscopy, Nephrectomy, Duration of surgery

scholarly journals Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Initial experience with different multichannel ports

2012 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoran Raznatovic ◽  
Nemanja Zaric ◽  
Ljubomir Djurasic ◽  
Nebojsa Lekic ◽  
Vladimir Djordjevic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical ◽  
Average Pain ◽  
Average Pain Score ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Cosmetic Effect ◽  
The Mean

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a relatively new minimally invasive surgical technique in treatment of benign gallbladder diseases. It is considered a bridge technique between conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and NOTES. We are presenting our initial experiences in SILC (single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy). Seventeen patients underwent SILC (11 women and 6 men) with an average age of 43 years. Mean BMI score was 29,4 kg/m2. The mean operative time was 93,5 minutes. There were conversions to conventional LC in two cases (11,6%). Average pain score measured on visual-analogue scale (VAS) 8h after the operation was 2,00. All patients expressed satisfaction with achieved cosmetic effect. We conclude that SILC is safe and feasible procedure, with excellent cosmetic effect, but further prospective studies are required before SILC can be generally accepted.

scholarly journals Fundus first laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with gall stone disease and the Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 2062
Author(s):  
Alexander F. Ale ◽  
Mercy W. Isichei ◽  
Danaan J. Shilong ◽  
Solomon D. Peter ◽  
Andrew H. Shitta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Gall Stone ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Stone Disease ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Gall Stone Disease ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Fitz Hugh Curtis Syndrome

Background: To present this experience using the fundus-first technique during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of symptomatic gall stone disease with an intra-operative finding of Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome.Methods: This is a prospective review of patients who had the fundus-first dissection during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The study was carried out at the Jos University Teaching Hospital (JUTH), and FOMAS hospital, both of which are tertiary hospitals located in Jos. Patients were recruited from January 2017 - January 2019. All patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy who had an intraoperative diagnosis of Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome, and who had the fundus-first dissection, were included in the study. Patients who had fundus-first dissection for indications other than Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome, were excluded from the study. Demographic and clinical information of patients included age, sex, duration of surgery, complications, and duration of hospital stay. Descriptive statistics were applied.Results: A total of 76 patients had elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies over the study period. Of that number, 17 (22.4%) patients had an intra- operative diagnosis of Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome, and had the fundus-first dissection. The mean patient age was 46.3 years (SD = 11.7 years). All patients were female. The mean operating time was 70 minutes (SD = 23 minutes). The duration of hospital stay was 24 hours. There was one conversion due to uncontrollable intraoperative bleeding.Conclusions: This study revealed that the fundus-first dissection is suitable for removing the gall bladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with gall stone disease, and an intraoperative finding of Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document