scholarly journals Comparison of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional laparoscopic instrument: a prospective observational study

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 514
Author(s):  
Samir Deolekar ◽  
Bhushankumar A. Thakur ◽  
Bhushan Jajoo ◽  
Parnika R. Shinde
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Operative Blood Loss ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
The Mean

Background: Laparoscopic surgery is one of the most significant surgical advances of twentieth century. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is criterion standard for the treatment of benign gall bladder diseases, and it is the most common laparoscopic surgery worldwide. The aim of the study was to compare the intra-operative and post-operative complication, conversion rate and outcome of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on short term follow up.Methods: This prospective analytical observational design study was carried out in Tertiary Health care centre.  As per convenience sampling 60 consecutive patients of cholelithiasis. Data obtained was analyzed and inferences were drawn regarding the outcomes of the SILC in terms of cosmesis, post-operative pain and any other complications and compare the outcomes against the conventional four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Results: In our study we found the mean operating time for SILC was 90.5±16.37 minutes, whereas the mean operating time for CLC was 74±17.83 (p = 0.0004). Intra-operative blood loss for SILC and CLC was comparable and statistically insignificant. Pain in the SILC group was found to be significantly low than CLC group (p ≤0.0001).  The median cosmetic scale score for SILC group was 20 with range 13-21 and in conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy group it was 16 with range 12-18 (p <0.0001).Conclusions: The major advantage of SILC is cosmetic satisfaction, while the disadvantages of SILS are longer operative time. There was no statistically significant difference in the intra-operative blood loss and conversion rate, and complications in both the techniques. Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) was developed with the aim of reducing the invasiveness of traditional laparoscopy.

scholarly journals Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy vs Conventional Cholecystectomy in Developing Country

2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (179) ◽  
Author(s):  
P B Thapa ◽  
DK Maharjan ◽  
DR Singh
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Level Of Satisfaction ◽  
Single Incision Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

INTRODUCTION: Use of laparoscopic surgery has demanded principles of less trauma of access hence less scar and so probably less complications. Hence conventional laparoscopic surgeries were tried with natural orifice transluminal surgery (NOTES) and then single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). With refinement in instruments and surgeons skills SILS have bridged up between conventional and NOTES in order to quench the desire of less or no scar at all. METHODS: Comparative case control study between conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and SILS in public teaching hospital. RESULTS: Total 20 patients underwent SILS cholecystectomy and 20 underwent conventional cholecystectomy and found that no difference between both in terms of post operative pain score, hospital stay and post operative wound infection except significant difference in mean operative time and patient's level of satisfaction was less in patient with SILC if were subjected to pay for instruments in order to maintain cosmesis. CONCLUSIONS: Though SILS have gained rapid acceptance in surgical fraternity, large number of randomized controlled trials are necessary to show its benefit over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Keywords: cholecystectomy, conventional, laparoscopy, single incision, surgery

scholarly journals Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Gallbladder Duplication

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Esin Kabul Gürbulak ◽  
Hamdi Özşahin ◽  
Yiğit Düzköylü ◽  
Ismail Ethem Akgün ◽  
Muharrem Battal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Congenital Anomaly ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Rare Congenital Anomaly ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Gallbladder Duplication

Duplication of the gallbladder is a rare congenital anomaly of the gallbladder, with an estimated prevalence of 1–3 per 3800 individuals. Unless properly diagnosed preoperatively, it can lead to biliary tract injuries and postoperative complications which may require reoperative surgeries. While previously reported cases have been treated with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), treatment with single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has not been reported yet. We herein present the case of a 58-year-old female with gallbladder duplication who was successfully treated with SILS cholecystectomy.

scholarly journals Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Initial experience with different multichannel ports

2012 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoran Raznatovic ◽  
Nemanja Zaric ◽  
Ljubomir Djurasic ◽  
Nebojsa Lekic ◽  
Vladimir Djordjevic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical ◽  
Average Pain ◽  
Average Pain Score ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Cosmetic Effect ◽  
The Mean

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a relatively new minimally invasive surgical technique in treatment of benign gallbladder diseases. It is considered a bridge technique between conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and NOTES. We are presenting our initial experiences in SILC (single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy). Seventeen patients underwent SILC (11 women and 6 men) with an average age of 43 years. Mean BMI score was 29,4 kg/m2. The mean operative time was 93,5 minutes. There were conversions to conventional LC in two cases (11,6%). Average pain score measured on visual-analogue scale (VAS) 8h after the operation was 2,00. All patients expressed satisfaction with achieved cosmetic effect. We conclude that SILC is safe and feasible procedure, with excellent cosmetic effect, but further prospective studies are required before SILC can be generally accepted.

Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Performed via the “Marionette” Technique Shows Equivalence in Outcome and Cost to Standard Four Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a Selected Patient Population

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (10) ◽  
pp. 1015-1020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam N. Saidy ◽  
Sunal S. Patel ◽  
Mark W. Choi ◽  
Mohammed Al-Temimi ◽  
Deron J. Tessier
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

The aim of our study is to compare single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) performed using the “marionette” technique (m-SILC), to the standard four-port technique [four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4PLC)]. Patient information was extracted from a prospectively maintained database (n = 188). Our primary endpoint was operative costs (determined by operating time and instruments used). Secondary endpoints were length of stay, operative time, blood loss, and postoperative complication rates. Univariate and adjusted multivariate analysis was used to compare the outcomes. There were a total of 188 patients for this study. Gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and resident participation were similar. Patients undergoing m-SILC were younger (43.8 vs 49.8 years old), less likely to have cholangiogram (32% vs 54%), and were more likely to undergo cholecystectomy for chronic cholecystitis (73.3% vs 52%). In univariate analysis, cholecystectomy performed by the “marionette method” as compared with the 4PLC was associated with shorter operative time (67 vs 59 minutes respectively) and shorter hospital stay (1.2 vs 2.08 days respectively). In multivariate analysis, SILC was associated with shorter hospital stay and comparable operative time, blood loss, and postoperative complications. Instrumentation cost was less in SILC (by $94). SILC done by an experienced surgeon with the “marionette” technique on a carefully selected population shows a statistically significant cost benefit while maintaining clinically comparable outcomes to the standard 4PLC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document