scholarly journals Treatment of stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures using proximal femoral nail and their functional assessment using modified Harris hip score

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 162
Author(s):  
Lakshya P. Rathore ◽  
Lokesh Gupta ◽  
Sanjay Thakur ◽  
Sandeep Vaidya ◽  
Devender Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Functional Evaluation ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Good Reduction ◽  
Non Union ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Modified Harris Hip Score ◽  
A Prospective Study

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Intertrochanteric fracture is common injury and is found in both elderly and the young. Proximal femoral nail (PFN) has been in widespread use for the same in the recent past. There are advocates both for and against this implant. The aim was to study the results of PFN in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures and their functional evaluation using the modified Harris hip score.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> A prospective study done on 104 patients operated for intertrochanteric fractures with PFN. Patients were followed up at 6 weekly intervals and evaluated at each visit using the modified Harris hip score (HHS).<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> The study consisted of 104 patients aged from 36 to 96 years with average age of 67.8 years. Most patients belonged to 60-80 years category. Malunion was observed in three patients (2.8%) and non union was not seen in any patient. Excellent to good results were seen in 73% patients 18% patients had a fair outcome, 7.7% had poor and 2% patients had very poor outcome.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> PFN is a good implant for intertrochanteric fracture treatment that demands a sound technique and a good reduction prior to insertion. The assessment of results using HHS has been too similar to those obtained using Kyle’s criteria in the previous studies, proving its role in the same.</p><p> </p>

scholarly journals Efficacy of proximal femoral nail augmentation in unstable intertrochanteric fracture

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 1043
Author(s):  
Purushotham V. J. ◽  
M. Ayyub Khan ◽  
Navneeth Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Cerclage Wire ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Modified Harris Hip Score ◽  
A Prospective Study

<p class="abstract"><strong><span lang="EN-US">Background: </span></strong><span lang="EN-US">To assess the short term functional and radiological outcome of unstable intertrochanteric fracture fixation using proximal femoral nail with augmentation using Cannulated Cancellous (CC) screw or Stainless Steel (SS) wiring.</span></p><p class="abstract"><strong><span lang="EN-US">Methods: </span></strong><span lang="EN-US">A prospective study was conducted with 20 cases of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures from May 2017 to March 2019. Six females and fourteen male patients in the age group between 40 and 80 years were included in this study. There were 8 cases of AO31A2 and 12 cases of AO31 A3. Fracture were fixed by proximal femoral nail with augmentation by an additional CC screw or encirclage with SS wires to strengthen the lateral trochanteric wall.</span></p><p class="abstract"><strong><span lang="EN-US">Results: </span></strong><span lang="EN-US">Fracture union was achieved in all cases with a mean period of 15.4 weeks. Patients were followed up for a period of 6 months. At the end of follow up the Modified Harris Hip Score was found to be more than 90 % in 16 cases.</span></p><p class="abstract"><strong><span lang="EN-US">Conclusion:</span></strong><span lang="EN-US"> Augmentation of proximal femoral nail in unstable intertrochanteric fracture with additional screw or cerclage wire increases the efficacy and stability of construct, aiding union and expedition of time to union.</span></p>

scholarly journals Management of Subtrochanteric Fracture Femur- by ProximalFemoralNailing

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-140
Author(s):  
Girish Sahni
Keyword(s):  
Excellent Result ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Subtrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Subtrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
One Year ◽  
Modified Harris Hip Score ◽  
A Prospective Study

Background: Numerous variations of intramedullary nailing have been evolved over the years for stable fixation and early mobilisation of subtrochanteric fracture, out of which one is proximal femoral nail. Aims and objectives –We conducted this study with an objective to evaluate the results of internal fixation of subtrochanteric fractures of the femur with proximal femoral nail – AO type Design.Methods:This was a prospective study carried out at our tertiary care institute on 30 patients who had suffered subtrochanteric fracture and were subsequently treated with a proximal femoral nail (PFN). Proximal femoral nail was inserted through the tip of greater trochanter. All patients were followed up for a period of one year; at an interval of 3 months and during each follow-up visit for the functional outcome by modified Harris Hip Score, was assessed in the form of walking, squatting, sitting and rising from chair.Results:Modified Harris hip score was used for the evaluation of results in our study which showed excellent result in 21 patients (70%), good results in 3 cases(10%), fair results in 3 patient (10%) and poor results in 3 cases(10%). The mean Harris hip score in our study was 90.6.Conclusion:PFN is an intramedullary load sharing implant. Reduction and management of subtrochanteric fractures is challenging in traumatology. Proximal femoral nailing spanning whole femur with proximal and distal locking appears to be a satisfactory implant in management of fractures of subtrochanteric femur.

AO/OTA 31A2 and 31A3 Intertrochanteric Fractures Managed by Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA)

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 2616-2618
Author(s):  
Zamir Hussain Tunio ◽  
Rizwan Ali Jhatiyal ◽  
Muhammad Azeem Akhund ◽  
M. Kashif Abbasi ◽  
S. Muhammad Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Psychiatric Disease ◽  
Unstable Fracture ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Intramedullary Device ◽  
Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation

Aim: To study the clinical and radiological outcome of unstable intertrochanteric fracture AO/OTA 31A2, 31A3 fixed by proximal femoral nail antirotation Study design: Descriptive cross sectional study. Place and duration of study: Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Jilani Institute of Medical Sciences, Gambat, Sindh from 1st January 2016 to 31st December 2019. Methodology: Forty four cases having intertrochanteric fracture AO/OTA 31A2, 31A3 with age ranging from 18 year to 55 year of either gender were selected; patients having close fracture, who were willing were included in the study, while patients older than 55 year and younger than 18 year, AO/OTA 31A1 fracture, open fracture, bilateral injuries, smoker, alcoholic, drug addicted, poly-trauma, pathological fracture and history of poor compliance, psychiatric disease were excluded. Results: There were 26(59.09%) males and 18(40.91%) females with mean age was 41.3±7.7 years. Regarding classification; AO/OTA 31A2 were 33 (75%), and 31A3 were 11 (25%). Mean time for union was 18.5±3.55 weeks. The average time of follow-up was 48.5±6.6 weeks. Harris Hip Score was excellent (90-100) in 31(70.45%), good (80-89) in 7(15.91%), fair (70-80) in 3 (6.81%) and poor (<70) in 3 (6.81%). Conclusion: Intramedullary device proximal femoral nail antirotation can be labelled as implant of choice for unstable intertrochanteric fractures AO/OTA 31A2, 31A3, with fruitful clinical and radiological outcomes, and with fewer complications. Hip Harris score was excellent-good in 86% of the patients. Key words: Proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA), AO/OTA 31A2, 31A3, Intertrochanteric, unstable fracture

scholarly journals Osteoporotic Intertrochanteric Fractures in the Elderly Managed with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation-The Functional Outcome

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
SPS Gill ◽  
Ankit Mittal ◽  
Manish Raj ◽  
Satosh Singh ◽  
Ajay Rajpoot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Functional Evaluation ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Radiological Outcome ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation

Introduction: Despite recent evolution in the operating techniques and surgical implants, debate continues around the choice of implant for the management of intertrochanteric fractures of femur bone. There is a paucity of clinical data on the results with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA). Aim: To evaluate the functional and radiological outcome of reduction and fixation of these fractures with PFNA. Materials and Methods: This prospective interventional study was conducted from december 2015 to november 2018. A total of 62 patients of more than 50 years of age with intertrochanteric fracture were managed with internal fixation using PFNA. All the pateints were evaluated with respect to the mean operative time, blood loss. Fluoroscopy exposure, time to union and development of any complication. The statistical analysis involved calculation of the mean and Standard Deviations (SD) of above parameters which was done using the Microsoft excel chart sheet. Functional evaluation was done using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Results: A total of 62 patients with age ranging from 54 to 94 years (mean 78.2, SD 09.11) were evaluated. The mean duration of follow-up was 14.3 months. The average operative time, the mean blood loss and the average fluoroscopy time were 61.4 (range 45-90 minutes, SD 11.6) minutes, 103.9 (range 60-200 mL, SD 36.4) mL and 74.0 (range 41 to 98, SD 13.5) seconds respectively. About 100% union rate with the average time to union being 16.1 (SD 3.3) weeks and ranging from 12 weeks to 24 weeks was reported. Varus collapse and limb shortening >1 cm were observed in 3 patients. The average HHS at the end of study showed a mean value of 82.8 (SD 8.6) and ranged from 65 to 94 with 46 (74.2%) patients having excellent to good outcome. Conclusion: Owing to easy insertion, reduced operative time and blood loss, stable fixation, less complications and good functional and radiological outcome, PFNA can prove to be an implant of choice for the management of intertrochantric fractures of the femur.

scholarly journals A Comparative Study of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture by Proximal Femoral Nail versus Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-Rotation among Adult Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-33
Author(s):  
Santosh Kumar Singh ◽  
Raj Kumar Bhartiya
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Functional Evaluation ◽  
Excellent Outcome ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture

Objective: To compare unstable intertrochanteric fracture by proximal femoral nail versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation among adult patients. Methods: This was a comparative study. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation (n=30) and Proximal femoral nail group (n=30). Singh’s index was used to grade the radiographs for the degree of osteoporosis. Functional evaluation was done at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months by using Harris Hip Score. Results: Majority of patients in both PFN (60%) and PFNA (70%) were between 61-70 years. More than half of patients of PFN (56.7%) and 43.3% of PFNA were males. The operative time was 84.00±9.39 minutes among patients of PFN and 61.03±5.75 minutes among patients of PFNA with significant difference between the groups. Singh’s grade III was most common among patients of both PFN (36.7%) and PFNA (36.7%). There was no significant (p>0.05) difference in Harris Hip score between the groups at all the time periods. Excellent outcome was in 63.3% patients of PFNA and in 46.7% patients of PFNA. Good outcome was in 33.3% patients of PFN and in 10% of PFNA. Conclusion: The study suggests that both PFN and PFNA perform well, showing equally good functional outcomes following fixation of unstable trochanteric fractures. PFNA offers no significant benefits over PFN in terms of post-operative complications. Keywords: Unstable intertrochanteric fracture, Proximal femoral nail, Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation.

scholarly journals A study to assess proximal femoral nailing versus dynamic hip screw device in surgical management of intertrochanteric fractures: a comparative study

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
E. S. Radhe Shyam ◽  
K. Ashwin
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Trochanteric Fracture ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Technical Failure ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Fracture Management ◽  
Hip Screw

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The incidence of inter trochanteric fracture is expected to have doubled by 2040. Inter trochanteric fractures account for about 45% to 50% of all hip fractures in the elderly populationand out of these, near about 50% to 60% are classified as unstable intertrochanteric fractures. The goal of treatment is restoring mobility safely and efficiently, while minimizing the risk of medical complications and technical failure. This study as performed<strong> </strong>to assess functional outcome with dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail in intertrochanteric fracture management.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> It was prospective observational study done for a period of 1year from January 2016-January 2017 among patients who attended OPD or emergency department with intertrochanteric fracture. Two different implants were used dynamic hip screw (DHS) and proximal femoral nail (PFN).<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Excellent results in functional outcome was more in case of PFN (66.6%) compared to DHS (50%). The type of trauma in DHS group was road traffic accident in 38.8%, domestic fall in 50% and others such as assault was in 11.1% while in PFN group intertrochanteric fracture was seen in 61.1% due to domestic fall.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The functional outcome was more better with proximal femoral nail (PFN) compared to dynamic hip screw (DHS). Therefore, proximal femoral nail (PFN) should be preferred for management of intertrochanteric fractures.</p>

scholarly journals Critical analysis of factors determining mechanical failures in proximal femoral nailing

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karthik Ramachandran ◽  
K. K. Arvind Manoj ◽  
A. Vishnu Sankar
Keyword(s):  
Failure Rate ◽  
Mechanical Failure ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Excellent Outcome ◽  
Lag Screw ◽  
Femoral Nailing ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nailing

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Intertrochanteric fractures are one of the commonest fractures encountered in elderly population. Though there are various implants, proximal femoral nail has been the standard choice for management of unstable fractures. Inspite of its biomechanical advantages, various complications like screw cut out, Z effect, reverse Z effect does occur in proximal femoral nailing. The aim of the study is to analyse various factors determining the mechanical failures in patients operated with proximal femoral nail.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This is a prospective study conducted in our institution from June 2014 to May 2018. The study included 72 patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail. All patients were followed for average period of 2 years. Functional outcome was assessed using Harris Hip score.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Among the patients<strong> </strong>33%<strong> </strong>had excellent outcome. 42% had good and 14% had fair outcome. 11% of cases ended with poor outcome. Mechanical failure rate was less in patients with positive medial cortical support (PMCS) and in patients with tip apex distance difference between antirotation screw and lag screw (TAD<sub>AR </sub>-TAD<sub>LS</sub>) more than 15 mm. Whereas the difference in the position of lag screw centre had no significant influence in the mechanical failure rate in our study.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> From our study we like to conclude that the<strong> </strong>fracture reduction with positive medial cortical support and the TAD difference play a major role in determining the incidence of mechanical failure in proximal femoral nailing.</p>

scholarly journals Functional and Radiological Outcome of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture in Old Age Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation-2

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
OP Jamshad ◽  
Jacob Mathew ◽  
Raju Karuppal
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Biological Reduction ◽  
Neck Shaft Angle ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Shaft Angle ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation

Introduction: Intertrochanteric fractures are prevalent in the elderly, which leave patients with functional restrictions. Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation-2 (PFNA) was developed to achieve better fixation strength, particularly in the presence of osteoporotic unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Aim: To evaluate the role and result of PFNA-2 in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in geriatric patients. Materials and Methods: A prospective analytical study was conducted in 35 patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures. They were followed-up clinically and radiologically for one year. The quality of fixation was assessed, by neck-shaft angle and Tip Apex Distance (TAD). A functional assessment was done with the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Results: The mean follow-up period was 13 months (range, 12-14). The mean age of patients was 65.6 years and the majority were female patients (62.85%). Functional results according to modified HHS were found to be excellent in 6 (17.1%) patients, good in 14 (40%) patients, fair in 12 (34.3%) patients and poor in 3 (8.6%) patients. The average HHS in this study was 81.6. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0. Conclusion: PFNA-2 helps in achieving biological reduction and good stability which enables early mobilisation and prevention of excessive collapse. A good functional outcome could be achieved when the radiological parameters are restored, i.e., TAD <25 mm and neck-shaft angle difference <5° (compared to the opposite side).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document