Analyzing the Status of 'Question' Research Based on Language Network Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 27-46
Author(s):  
Kitae Kim ◽  
Kisoon Han
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-115
Author(s):  
Yun-Jung Choi ◽  
Ji-Hyeon Son ◽  
Young-Ji Song ◽  
Hye- Min Kwon ◽  
Ro-Sa Park ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-18
Author(s):  
Kathryn A. Stofer ◽  
James Fulton ◽  
Heather Nesbitt ◽  
Anna Prizzia ◽  
Karen A. Garrett ◽  
...  

For farmers to adopt and maintain sustainable farming practices, they must have the resources and network to succeed with this work and must realize a positive impact on their business model. As a food system is ultimately made up of the people, organizations, and institutions that grow, move, buy and sell food, we must understand who is at the center of this network, who is well-connected, and who is peripheral. Within a particular regional food system in a highly productive southeastern U.S. state, the network of local producers interested in sustainable production, including environmental and economic components, seems to be growing. However, it is unclear who benefits from this system and whether this system is growing in a way that encourages and enhances the benefits for sustainable agriculture. Existing evidence for the network size and its vulnerabilities has been anecdotal, from Extension agents and their contacts with individual producers, rather than based on systematic research. We used social network analysis to understand the status of the system and its constituents. Connections between producers appear to be weak overall with potential fragmentation, suggesting a fragility that could easily derail efforts to increase sustainable production in the region.  


Author(s):  
Jonathan Renshon

This book has examined the importance of status in world politics. It has introduced the status dissatisfaction theory and applied it directly to the realm of international relations. It has tested the theory using a variety of approaches, including network analysis, by investigating the relationship between status dissatisfaction and war, if and how status concerns motivated German decision making during the Weltpolitik era, and the link between heightened status concerns and the escalation of commitment. The book concludes by discussing four broad lessons that can be drawn from the findings as well as the open questions that remain: status is local; there are many paths to status; status concerns are what count and not status itself; and status dissatisfaction leads to escalation and conflict. It also considers the policy implications of the theories of international politics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document