Foreign exchange positions and risks of czech banks

1997 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef Jílek ◽  
Jiřina Jílková
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Exchange ◽  
Banking System ◽  
Market Risk ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Minimum Capital ◽  
Market Risks ◽  
Current State ◽  
National Bank ◽  
Foreign Exchange Trading

Almost every bank has some degree of foreign exchange exposure. A bank, which holds net open positions in foreign currencies is exposed to the risk that exchange rates may move against it. Net open positions are due to foreign exchange trading positions or because of exposures caused by firm's overall assets and liabilities. Czech National Bank has imposed limits of FX risks and is thus limiting maximum potential loss of the Czech banking system. The paper describes the way how to calculate a bank's open FX positions and the current state of FX positions in selected Czech commercial hanks. The FX risk is a part of market risk. The Capital Adequacy Directive (CAD) and Basle Committee on Banking Supervision in its document Amendment to the Capital Accord to Incorporate Market Risks set out the minimum capital requirements for credit institutions and investment firms with respect to market risk.

Basel Capital Adequacy Ratio Standard in The Light of Islamic Law Perspective

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 308-317
Author(s):  
Adi Rahmanur Ibnu
Keyword(s):  
Financial Crises ◽  
Global Economy ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Minimum Capital ◽  
Capital Adequacy Ratio ◽  
Global Banking ◽  
Banking Development

Bank is one of the most important pillars of economy activities. However, banking sector has a real potential crisis threat. Alongside with the steady current global banking development, financial crises that have happened clearly affected global economy. Based on that situation, BIS (Bank for International Settlement) – an international financial standard setting organization, realizes the urgency to establishan international financial standard and supervision to anticipate future potential financial crises. This research aims to identify how Capital Adequacy Ratio Standard in Basel Capital Accord (II) based on Islamic law perspective. The research is conducted by analyzing Basel Capital Accord published by BIS. The research uses library research method to find out the aimed result. The focus is on the 1st pillar of Basel II publication that is Minimum Capital Requirements (CAR) policy. CAR, as an Islamic economics policy, will be analyzed using falāḥ approach. Falāḥ is an Islamic economics objective that consists of happiness, success, accomplishment or good luck concept. The earthly dimension of falāḥ has some parameters that can be used to analyze Islamic economics policy. Additionally, the Islamic fiqh maxim takes part in analyzing the policy. The maṣlaḥat concept in fiqh maxim approach shares aim with falāḥ concept in the sense that all of sharia law aims for success, happiness, eternal survival etc. The maṣlaḥat can be accomplished by extinguishing mafsadat or seizing maṣlaḥat. The maṣlaḥat aspect is essential to determine the compatibility Basel Capital Accord with jurisprudential maxim i.e harm must be dispelled (al-dharāru yuzāl). The conclusion results are, 1) Basel Capital Accord focuses on macro-prudential aspect in order to anticipate potential financial crises, 2) beneficial/interest (maṣlaḥat) aspects of the hereafter, cooperation principle, justice, fairness and the prohibition of exploitation are not the core value of Basel Capital Accord frame work, thus 3) the achievement of maslahat as intended by sharia i.e. jurisprudential maxim are not convincing. Therefore, 4) Basel Capital Accord as a regulation basis is not in line with jurisprudential maxim i.e harm must be dispelled (al-dharāru yuzāl).

Islamic Banking Regulations in Light of Basel II

2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kabir Hassan ◽  
Muhammad Abdul Mannan Chowdhury
Keyword(s):  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Banking Regulation ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Basel Ii ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Regulatory Agencies ◽  
Islamic Banking ◽  
Islamic Banks ◽  
Minimum Capital ◽  
Regulatory Standards

This paper seeks to determine whether the existing regulatory standards and supervisory framework are adequate to ensure the viability, strength, and continued expansion of Islamic financial institutions. The reemergence of Islamic banking and the attention given to it by regulators around the globe as to the implications of a recently issued Basel II banking regulation makes this article timely. The Basel II framework, which is based on minimum capital requirements, a supervisory review process, and the effective use of market discipline, aligns capital adequacy with banking risks and provides an incentive for financial institutions to enhance risk management and their system of internal controls. Like conventional banks, Islamic banks operate under different regulatory regimes. The still diverse views held by the regulatory agencies of different countries on Islamic banking and finance operations make it harder to assess the overall performance of international Islamic banks. In light of the increased financial innovation and diversity of instruments offered in Islamic finance, the need to improve the transparency of bank operations is particularly relevant for Islamic banks. While product diversity is important in maintaining their competitiveness, it also requires increased transparency and disclosure to improve the understanding of markets and regulatory agencies. The governance of Islamic banks is made even more complex by the need for these banks to meet a set of ethical and financial standards defined by the Shari`ah and the nature of the financial contracts banks use to mobilize deposits. Effective transparency in this area will greatly enhance their credibility and reinforce their depositors and investors’ level of confidence.

Islamic Banking Regulations in Light of Basel II

2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-101
Author(s):  
M. Kabir Hassan ◽  
Muhammad Abdul Mannan Chowdhury
Keyword(s):  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Banking Regulation ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Basel Ii ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Regulatory Agencies ◽  
Islamic Banking ◽  
Islamic Banks ◽  
Minimum Capital ◽  
Regulatory Standards

This paper seeks to determine whether the existing regulatory standards and supervisory framework are adequate to ensure the viability, strength, and continued expansion of Islamic financial institutions. The reemergence of Islamic banking and the attention given to it by regulators around the globe as to the implications of a recently issued Basel II banking regulation makes this article timely. The Basel II framework, which is based on minimum capital requirements, a supervisory review process, and the effective use of market discipline, aligns capital adequacy with banking risks and provides an incentive for financial institutions to enhance risk management and their system of internal controls. Like conventional banks, Islamic banks operate under different regulatory regimes. The still diverse views held by the regulatory agencies of different countries on Islamic banking and finance operations make it harder to assess the overall performance of international Islamic banks. In light of the increased financial innovation and diversity of instruments offered in Islamic finance, the need to improve the transparency of bank operations is particularly relevant for Islamic banks. While product diversity is important in maintaining their competitiveness, it also requires increased transparency and disclosure to improve the understanding of markets and regulatory agencies. The governance of Islamic banks is made even more complex by the need for these banks to meet a set of ethical and financial standards defined by the Shari`ah and the nature of the financial contracts banks use to mobilize deposits. Effective transparency in this area will greatly enhance their credibility and reinforce their depositors and investors’ level of confidence.

„Qualitative“ Bankenaufsicht – „Königsweg“ der Regulierung?

2000 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Paul
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Banking Regulation ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
First Century ◽  
Bank Risk ◽  
Management Systems ◽  
Banking Supervision ◽  
Minimum Capital ◽  
Proposal A

Abstract Banking regulation in the twenty-first century is at the crossroads. The article discusses the question whether the supervisory review of bank risk management systems is superior to the minimum capital requirements in traditional style. It points out the serious problems of both ways - especially the first one, which was preferred by the Basle Committee of Banking Supervision in its proposal ,,A new capital adequacy framework`` (June 1999).

The Development of the National Money Market, 1893-1911

1976 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 878-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. James
Keyword(s):  
Interest Rates ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Late Nineteenth Century ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing ◽  
Central Importance ◽  
Asset Pricing Model ◽  
Minimum Capital ◽  
Commercial Paper ◽  
National Bank ◽  
Portfolio Selection Model

In this article the convergence of U.S. interregional interest rates in the late nineteenth century is examined and two major hypotheses are tested in the framework of a bank portfolio selection model based on the capital-asset-pricing model. Both the spread of the commercial paper market and the lowering of entry barriers through the reduction of national bank minimum capital requirements are rejected as principal explanations. The erosion of local monopoly power is shown to have been of central importance, and this development was due to the growth of state rather than national banks.

U. S. Investment Banks in the Context of the Post-Crisis International Banking Regulation Reform

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-40
Author(s):  
Eduard Dzhagityan ◽  
Anastasiya Podrugina ◽  
Sofya Streltsova
Keyword(s):  
Financial Stability ◽  
Banking Regulation ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Investment Banks ◽  
Basel Iii ◽  
International Banking ◽  
Minimum Capital ◽  
Negative Effect

The article looks into the reasons underlying the outspread of the full-scale mechanism of banking regulation over U. S. investment banks. We analyze the effect of the Basel III standards on stress-resilience of investment banks and examine the role of U. S. investment banks in ensuring financial stability. Based on regression analysis we found that minimum capital adequacy standards of Basel III do not have negative effect on ROE of the U. S. investment banks that are G-SIB category-designate; however, additional capital requirements (Higher Loss Absorbency (HLA) surcharge) that depend on G-SIB’s systemic significance according to their bucket as per Financial Stability Board classification do have significant and negative effect on ROE in the post crisis period. Besides, leverage requirements that also depend on G-SIB’s systemic significance have a statistically significant effect on ROE.

Countercyclical Capital Buffer for Banks: is There a Premise for its Application in Russia?

2018 ◽  
pp. 97-116
Author(s):  
Svetlana Khasyanova
Keyword(s):  
Strategic Management ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Gap Dynamics ◽  
Macroprudential Policy ◽  
Filtration Method ◽  
Minimum Capital ◽  
Macroprudential Policies ◽  
Russian Economy

Recently, the concept of countercyclical regulation in the financial sector has become key for the implementation of macroprudential policies in many countries, while a countercyclical buffer capital of banks is becoming a primary tool of regulation. The purpose of this research is to study the appropriateness and specifics of the countercyclical capital buffer application in Russia’s banking sector based on the analysis of credit aggregates’ dynamics for 2004-2016 and for the mid-term. Drawing on the filtration method, the study shows that the most effective indicator of excessive lending in the Russian economy is credit-to-GDP, the gap dynamics of which testifies a possible activation of capital buffer in 2007 and 2013. At the same time, the size of the buffer appeared to be insignificant, with a short activation period, which suggests the replacement of the buffer with alternative regulative tools. The minimum capital adequacy, taking into account the buffer, is not critical for the banking sector. However, some of the largest banks appeared to be vulnerable to increased capital requirements. The results of this study are of great value both for the implementation of macroprudential policy, and for strategic management of banks capital adequacy.

The Financial Crisis, Basel Accords and Bank Regulations: An Overview

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 225
Author(s):  
Mona A. ElBannan
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Financial Crisis ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Management Tools ◽  
Information Transparency ◽  
Minimum Capital ◽  
Basel Accords ◽  
As Stress

This theoretical study presents the different phases for the evolution of Basel Accords since 1988, and the continual efforts of Basel Committee on banking supervision to set out an effective framework to improve the banking sector governance and performance. In literature, compliance with Basel requirements concerning minimum capital requirements, powerful supervision and effective market discipline through information transparency and disclosure have attracted many researchers to study its impact on bank performance and cost of capital. In spite of the risk-based capital adequacy, regulatory and supervisory requirements set by Basel Accords, the financial crisis 2007, which causes instability and turmoil in the whole banking sector, was induced mainly by weak risk management measures, such as stress testing and other risk management tools that were unable to forecast the losses and the adverse unexpected outcomes and determine the size of capital needed to overcome severe shocks.

scholarly journals Recent Issues in the Implementation of the New Basel Minimum Capital Requirements for Market Risk

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Orgeldinger
Keyword(s):  
Internal Model ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
Market Risk ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Risk Models ◽  
Minimum Capital ◽  
Basel Committee ◽  
Risk Framework ◽  
Theoretical Foundations ◽  
Model Approach

The Basel Committee suggested new ways of dealing with market risk in banks’ trading and banking books, in its October 2013 consultative paper, and subsequent versions published thereafter, for revised market risk framework FRTB. The Basel Committee estimates that the new rules will result in an approximate median capital increase of 22% and a weighted average capital increase of 40% (BCBS 2016), compared with the current framework. Budget reports on FRTB implementation range from costs of 5-million USD to 250-million USD. Key changes can be found in the internal model approach, in the standard rules and in the approval process. Significant changes introduced by the FRTB include stricter separation of the trading and banking book. Regardless of whether they use standardized or internal models, banks will need to review their portfolios to determine if existing classifications of instruments and desks as trading or banking book are still applicable, or whether a revision of desk structure is needed. In its article ‘Critical appraisal of the Basel fundamental review of the trading book regulation’ (Orgeldinger 2017) the theoretical foundations of the internal model approach IMA were analysed and the criticisms for FRTB risk models were investigated. A recent onslaught of rules is rendering the existing timeline for implementation practically impossible. In this article we present and critically evaluate different approaches to implement the new rules suggested by academics and major consulting companies.

scholarly journals Analisis Pengaruh Car, Npl, Nim, Bopo Dan Ldr Terhadap Roe Pada Bank Umum Swasta Nasional Devisa Di Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Monica
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Exchange ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Return On Equity ◽  
Net Interest Margin ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Capital Adequacy Ratio ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
National Bank ◽  
Linear Regressions

This research is meant to find out the influence of Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Non Performing Loan (NPL), Net Interest Margin (NIM), Biaya Operasional/Pendapatan Operasional (BOPO), and Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) to the Return on Equity (ROE) at Private Foreign Exchange National Bank in Indonesia. The population is all Private Foreign Exchange National Bank in Indonesia. This study has been done by using purposive sampling method with two criteria so 20 companies have been selected as samples. The analysis technique has been done by using multiple linear regressions. The results showed that CAR, NIM, and LDR did not effect to ROE, whereas NPL and BOPO has negative effect to ROE. Where it was proved  that together CAR, NPL, NIM, BOPO, and LDR have influence to ROE. Management should improve the company’s financial performance, especially on the non performing loan and operational efficiency of the business so that the company can improve to ROE

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document