The UK: Financial Globalization and Formalization of Banking Supervision

Among the developed economies, the UK was the latest to formalize banking supervision as we define it in this book. The process began in the mid-1970s following the fringe bank crisis and the simultaneous beginning of international cooperation on banking regulation matters in the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. The crisis led to the reforms of both the Banking Act and the Bank of England Act in 1979—the Bank of England was assigned its first formal duties and responsibilities for banking supervision, and the commercial banks had to meet bank-specific requirements instead of the general corporate law. However, given the reluctance of the Bank of England to conduct banking supervisory activities as well as the Bank’s behavior to stick with the conventional informal “governor's eyebrow,” we deem the formalization process ongoing until the reforms of 1987. The Banking Act 1987 clarified the Bank of England's responsibilities and mandate regarding banking supervision, and the Board of Banking Supervision was established as a permanent formal organization to monitor and council the Bank of England on supervisory matters. The UK is an interesting case where the banking supervision remained informal until quite recently—compared to other countries. The formalization process can be explained by the crisis and the international push for harmonized banking regulation.

Calculating capital requirements for operational risk

Operational risks have become increasingly important for banks, especially against the background of growing IT dependency and the increasing complexity of their activities. Further-more, the corona pandemic contributed to the increased risk potential. Therefore, banks have to back these risks with own funds. There are currently three measurement approaches for determining the capital requirements for operational risk. In recent years, and especially during the Great Financial Crisis of 2007/2008, however, some of the weaknesses inherent in these approaches have become apparent. Thus, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision revised the current capital framework. Therefore, this article examines the various measurement approaches, addresses inherent weaknesses and moreover, presents the future measurement approach developed by the supervisory authorities.

Global administrative law: The Basel Committee revisited

<p>Global Administrative Law is the branch of Global Governance that seeks to provide guidance and structures for decision‐making bodies and international organisations that rely on co‐operation between a range of international actors to achieve various objectives or implement policy agendas. In 2006, Michael S. Barr and Geoffrey P. Miller critically analysed the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Their article Global Administrative Law: The View from Basel sought to dispel the critiques that international‐law making processes lacked democratic accountability and oversight by offering the Basel Committee’s own processes as a model for international law‐making with greater accountability and legitimacy. This article examines the Basel Committee since Barr and Miller’s 2006 article, in light of the global financial crisis and the development of ‘Basel III’. It will seek to determine whether the processes described by Barr and Miller proved to be effective, and if Global Administrative Legal theory is appropriately applied to the Basel Committee. Finally, the article will ask whether the Basel Committee still serves as a model for international law‐making with greater accountability and legitimacy, or if more work is needed to fulfill this model.</p>

Global administrative law: The Basel Committee revisited

<p>Global Administrative Law is the branch of Global Governance that seeks to provide guidance and structures for decision‐making bodies and international organisations that rely on co‐operation between a range of international actors to achieve various objectives or implement policy agendas. In 2006, Michael S. Barr and Geoffrey P. Miller critically analysed the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Their article Global Administrative Law: The View from Basel sought to dispel the critiques that international‐law making processes lacked democratic accountability and oversight by offering the Basel Committee’s own processes as a model for international law‐making with greater accountability and legitimacy. This article examines the Basel Committee since Barr and Miller’s 2006 article, in light of the global financial crisis and the development of ‘Basel III’. It will seek to determine whether the processes described by Barr and Miller proved to be effective, and if Global Administrative Legal theory is appropriately applied to the Basel Committee. Finally, the article will ask whether the Basel Committee still serves as a model for international law‐making with greater accountability and legitimacy, or if more work is needed to fulfill this model.</p>

Modeling Non-Maturing Demand Deposits: A Proposed Methodology to Determining the Idiosyncratic Confidence Level Used for Separating Stable Deposit Volumes From Volatile Deposit Volumes

This paper aims to develop a methodology for the estimation of the idiosyncratic confidence level inherent within the process of determining the threshold of separation between volatile and stable deposit volumes. The idiosyncratic confidence level must be reflective of the institution’s specific risk preferences and liquidity risk management policies as anchored into the Principle 9 of the European Banking Authority and Basel Committee for Banking Supervision recommendations. We illustrate the proposed methodology by including liquidity constraints from the Basel III regulatory recommendations introduced in 2013. Furthermore, we point to other ancillary applications of such procedures in the financial risk management practice.

Measurement and analysis of factors that affecting the financial stability of private banks registered in the Iraq Stock Exchange for the period (2017-2013): قياس وتحليل العوامل المؤثرة في الاستقرار المالي للمصارف الأهلية المسجلة في سوق العراق للأوراق المالية للمدة (2013-2017)

The objective of this study was to measure the banking factors (capital adequacy, credit capacity, and revenue capacity) and to show their impact on the banking stability of the private banks registered in the Iraq Stock Exchange. Where the bank credit represents the most important source of bank money in terms of achieving profits and the most exposed to risks, which is reflected in the bank’s business and its financial indicators. Also, achieving ratio (adequacy of banking capital) corresponded with the guidelines of the Basel Committee for is one of the top concerns of the banking administration. Each of the (z_score) and multiple linear regression models were used to measure the stability of banks and calculated the impact of the study variables on financial stability. The research sample consisted of (6) private banks, these banks are apart of 44 private banks of registered in Iraq Stock Exchange which are operating in Iraq. The research reached to set of conclusions, including that achieving financial stability for banks depends mainly on strengthening the adequacy of capital and then its ability to achieve profits. Also, the research recommended that banks implement the decisions of the Basel Committee (first, second and third) that contribute to enhancing the financial stability of banks.

Fundamental review of the trading book: state of art on implementation of Standardised Approach

Following the publication of the regulatory framework for the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) by both the Basel Committee (BCBS) and the EU Regulator, the Financial Institutions have started the mandatory actions to comply with the new regulatory requirements. This article aims to provide an overview of the key challenges that banks have had to face in recent years, with a particular focus on the most significant methodological key points and the main impacts on business from the technicalities of the new regulatory framework, in order to provide guidelines and best practices on Standardized Approach (SA) topics shared between Risk Management and Front Office

Determination of attributes of bank's bankruptcy in the light of digitalization of banking supervision

The article is devoted to the current measures of regulation of banking supervision in connection with the implementation of international standards of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. The authors come to the conclusion about the importance of the implementation of these standards in the light of the possibility of identifying attributes of bank bankruptcy. The ways of practicing banking supervision are subjects to modernization and legal updating in connection with digitalization and new forms of banking activity.

Computing value-at-risk and expected shortfall in operational risk

Operational Risk has become more popular in the past fifteen years. The Basel committee realized its importance and banks have to allocate more capital charge, yet this is still not enough. With these new rules, banks have put in place new procedures to compute their risk measures and allocate enough capital charge to avoid bankruptcy. The Basel committee under Basel II has proposed different approaches to compute risk measures for Operational Risk, namely the Basic Indicator Approach, the Advanced Measurement Approach and the Standardized Approach. In our research, we will study the case of Loss Distribution Approach, which has been discussed before, and will contribute to the field by using a heavy-tailed distributed severity: g-and-h distributed. Then, we will analyze and test some methods to compute the value-at-risk( VaR) and conditional value-at-risk or expected shortfall (CVaR).

Computing value-at-risk and expected shortfall in operational risk

Operational Risk has become more popular in the past fifteen years. The Basel committee realized its importance and banks have to allocate more capital charge, yet this is still not enough. With these new rules, banks have put in place new procedures to compute their risk measures and allocate enough capital charge to avoid bankruptcy. The Basel committee under Basel II has proposed different approaches to compute risk measures for Operational Risk, namely the Basic Indicator Approach, the Advanced Measurement Approach and the Standardized Approach. In our research, we will study the case of Loss Distribution Approach, which has been discussed before, and will contribute to the field by using a heavy-tailed distributed severity: g-and-h distributed. Then, we will analyze and test some methods to compute the value-at-risk( VaR) and conditional value-at-risk or expected shortfall (CVaR).