scholarly journals A Group Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Improves Quality of Life of Multiple Sclerosis Patients and Delays Disease Progression: A Multi-Centre Controlled Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-84
Author(s):  
Richard Devy ◽  
Philip Lehert ◽  
Marc Genty
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Group Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Multiple Sclerosis Patients

Background: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) affects quality of life (QoL). Pharmacological treatments demonstrated benefits on clinical endpoints without improving QoL. We evaluated the effects of a group Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) on QoL disease progression. Methods: One-year multi-centre controlled multivariate-matched study was organised on Relapsing-Remitting MS (RRMS) patients with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) < 4, MS duration < 2 years, treated by interferon I? in 11 French centres. For each new patient, the two best-matching patients for age, gender, EDSS, mood, illness duration baseline variables were selected in the other centres. The self-filled Two Lives Scale (TLS)-QoL10 was used at months (M) 0-3-6-9-12-15; the post-baseline mean QoL was the endpoint. We compared CBT + I? to I? alone. The effect of disease progression on QoL was evaluated by modelling, for each visit, the effect of EDSS on QoL at later visits.Results: 19 + 32 patients were recruited. Compared to placebo, improvements of 1.10 (95%CI [0.31-1.89], p = 0.009) and 1.43*** [0.72, 2.15] were observed in the CBT group on QoL and coping scales, respectively. Coping explained 81%*** [57, 100] of the effect of CBT on QoL. QoL was negatively affected by disease progression (0.95*** [-1.21; 0.63]), whereas EDSS was influenced by QoL values (-0.10*** [-0.14; -0.06]).Conclusions: We observed a clinically significant beneficial effect of CBT on QoL, the effect of CBT essentially explained by an increase of coping, a positive influence of QoL on disease progression. QoL is both the most important target for patients and a factor of slowing disease progression.

scholarly journals Yoga, cognitive–behavioural therapy versus education to improve quality of life and reduce healthcare costs in people with endometriosis: a randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. e046603
Author(s):  
Antonina Mikocka-Walus ◽  
Marilla Druitt ◽  
Melissa O'Shea ◽  
David Skvarc ◽  
Jennifer J Watts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
System Perspective ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Weekly Group

IntroductionEndometriosis is a debilitating chronic inflammatory condition highly burdensome to the healthcare system. The present trial will establish the efficacy of (1) yoga and (2) cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT), above (3) education, on quality of life, biopsychosocial outcomes and cost-effectiveness.Methods and analysisThis study is a parallel randomised controlled trial. Participants will be randomly allocated to yoga, CBT or education. Participants will be English-speaking adults, have a diagnosis of endometriosis by a qualified physician, with pain for at least 6 months, and access to internet. Participants will attend 8 weekly group CBT sessions of 120 min; or 8 weekly group yoga sessions of 60 min; or receive weekly educational handouts on endometriosis. The primary outcome measure is quality of life. The analysis will include mixed-effects analysis of variance and linear models, cost–utility analysis from a societal and health system perspective and qualitative thematic analysis.Ethics and disseminationEnrolment in the study is voluntary and participants can withdraw at any time. Participants will be given the option to discuss the study with their next of kin/treating physician. Findings will be disseminated via publications, conferences and briefs to professional organisations. The University’s media team will also be used to further disseminate via lay person articles and media releases.Trial registration numberACTRN12620000756921p; Pre-results.

scholarly journals A Tailored, Therapist-Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Intervention as an Addition to Care as Usual for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Economic Evaluation alongside an RCT (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maaike Ferwerda ◽  
Sylvia van Beugen ◽  
Henriët van Middendorp ◽  
Henk Visser ◽  
Harald Vonkeman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Healthcare Use ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

BACKGROUND A chronic somatic condition, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), can significantly reduce health related quality of life due to psychological, social and physical consequences. Cognitive behavioural therapy can aid in improving outcomes for patients, for example in terms of disease trajectory, health care utilization, and workplace disability of patients. In recent years internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy has been proposed as an effective and efficient way to offer cognitive behavioural therapy and further implementation. However, little research has been conducted to support this proposition. OBJECTIVE To stimulate the implementation of effective treatment strategies for improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), cost-benefit ratios are required to inform stake-holders. A cost-effectiveness study from a societal perspective was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial on a tailored and therapist-guided internet-based cognitive behavioural intervention (ICBT) for patients with elevated levels of distress, as an addition to usual care alone. METHODS Data were collected at baseline/pre-intervention, 6 months/post-intervention, and three-monthly thereafter during one year follow-up. Effects were measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs from a societal perspective including healthcare sector costs (including healthcare use, medication, and intervention costs), patient travel costs for healthcare use, and costs associated with loss of labor. RESULTS The intervention improved quality of life compared to usual care alone (Δ QALYs= 0.059), but also led to higher costs (Δ= € 4.211,44), which reduced substantially when medication costs were left out of the equation (Δ= € 1.862,72). Most (93%) of the simulated ICERS were in the north-east quadrant, suggesting a high probability that the intervention is effective in improving HRQoL, but at a greater monetary cost for society compared to usual care alone. CONCLUSIONS A tailored and guided ICBT intervention as an addition to usual care for patients with RA with heightened distress was effective in gaining quality of life. Consequently, implementation of the ICBT into standard healthcare for patients with RA is recommended, yet further study into cost reductions in this population is warranted. CLINICALTRIAL National trial registry number:NTR2100

scholarly journals Economic evaluation of online computerised cognitive–behavioural therapy without support for depression in primary care: randomised trial

2010 ◽  
Vol 196 (4) ◽  
pp. 310-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. H. Gerhards ◽  
L. E. de Graaf ◽  
L. E. Jacobs ◽  
J. L. Severens ◽  
M. J. H. Huibers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Significant Group ◽  
Efficient Treatment ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
The Cost

BackgroundEvidence about the cost-effectiveness and cost utility of computerised cognitive–behavioural therapy (CCBT) is still limited. Recently, we compared the clinical effectiveness of unsupported, online CCBT with treatment as usual (TAU) and a combination of CCBT and TAU (CCBT plus TAU) for depression. The study is registered at the Netherlands Trial Register, part of the Dutch Cochrane Centre (ISRCTN47481236).AimsTo assess the cost-effectiveness of CCBT compared with TAU and CCBT plus TAU.MethodCosts, depression severity and quality of life were measured for 12 months. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses were performed from a societal perspective. Uncertainty was dealt with by bootstrap replications and sensitivity analyses.ResultsCosts were lowest for the CCBT group. There are no significant group differences in effectiveness or quality of life. Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses tend to be in favour of CCBT.ConclusionsOn balance, CCBT constitutes the most efficient treatment strategy, although all treatments showed low adherence rates and modest improvements in depression and quality of life.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document